Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fe and Zn nanoparticles increased wheat tiller number by 26.1% under drought stress.

A claim from Effects of iron, zinc, and silicon nanoparticles on morpho-physiological growth, yield, and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe and Zn nanoparticles increased wheat tiller number by 26.1% under drought stress.

Treatment
combined use of Fe and Zn-NPse0
Outcome
number of tillerse0
Direction
maximum increasese0
Value
26.1 %e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined use of Fe and Zn-NPs (T 5 ) showed most promising results for wheat growth under drought stress, with the maximum increases in plant height (17.59 %), leaf area (68.2 %), and number of tillers (26.1 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1604

Title

Effects of iron, zinc, and silicon nanoparticles on morpho-physiological growth, yield, and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress

Mingliang Ding; Chigui Xiao; Shaoxiang Li; et al. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 2025. doi:10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100789

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-6bd2dbd71fac6d314a282f070ce2aa62cb0710f31c31cf5f7cfb29d03f0aecae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.