Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined bacterial and rhizobial fertilizer gave the highest plant height, nodules and shoot dry matter.

A claim from Effect of varying levels of phosphorus and bio-fertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea under sub-tropical condition · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacterial and rhizobial fertilizer gave the highest plant height, nodules and shoot dry matter.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B. thuringiensis) + Rhizobium Mesorhizobiume0
Interactor
B. thuringiensise0symbiontt1
Second interactor
Rhizobium Mesorhizobiume0symbiontt1
Outcome
plant height, number of nodules, shoot dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B. thuringiensis) + Rhizobium Mesorhizobium resulted in highest plant height, number of nodules, shoot dry matter accumulation, number of primary and secondary branches, seed and stover yield, biological yield and harvest index of chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1623
t0

“Effect of varying levels of phosphorus and bio-fertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea under sub-tropical condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119
t1

“Effect of varying levels of phosphorus and bio-fertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea under sub-tropical condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119

Title

Effect of varying levels of phosphorus and bio-fertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea under sub-tropical condition

Aman Parashar; JAIDEV SHARMA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2024. doi:10.59797/ija.v69i4.5504

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-7ce79e97c41efb58301e7470660d9ef750b922bd34419644d075aad80b0668bf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Mesorhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.