Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed inoculation, Rizotorfin and fertilizer use improved economic efficiency.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF FERTILIZERS AND PRESOWING SEED TREATMENT ON YIELD OF CHICKPEAS GROWN ON LIGHT CHESTNUT SOILS · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation, Rizotorfin and fertilizer use improved economic efficiency.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
seed inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (nitraginization), and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizerse0
Interactor
nitrogen fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
economic efficiencye0
Direction
improvese0
Comparator
the controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed inoculation with nitrogen fixing bacteria (nitraginization), and application of Rizotorfin and fertilizers results in a significant yield increase and improves economic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1220
e1

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–496
e2

“compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1336

Title

INFLUENCE OF FERTILIZERS AND PRESOWING SEED TREATMENT ON YIELD OF CHICKPEAS GROWN ON LIGHT CHESTNUT SOILS

S. A. Orosov; M. M. Okonov; E. A. Dzhirgalova Theoretical & applied problems of agro-industry 2020. doi:10.32935/2221-7312-2020-44-2-3-5

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8c1c97b2ce898c4476a4c47e3ef25844f270382de02b8e764f1337b641f5f536 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Above 80–120 kg ha −1 N, chickpea production decreased.

    NITROGEN FIXATION OF GRAIN LEGUMES DIFFERS IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN FERTILISATION · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Additional nitrogen had no significant effect on chickpea seed yield.

    Response of Chickpea to Nitrogen, and a Comparison of the Factors Affecting Chickpea Seed Yield with those Affecting Wheat Grain Yield · 1995

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Different nitrogen levels did not influence NBeG47 seed yield, yield attributes or plant biometrics.

    Suitability of chickpea ‘NBeG47’ for mechanical harvesting under rainfed condition · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Nitrogen did not increase chickpea seed yield.

    Effect of sowing date, nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation on flowering and development of yield in chickpeas · 1993

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Lower nitrogen reduced crop yields.

    Growth Performance of Mustard and Chickpea under Different Intercropping Patterns and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels in North-Western India · 2025

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen doses of 0 to 120 kg ha(-1) had no significant effect on chickpea yield and yield components.

    The effect of bacterial inoculation and different nitrogen doses on yield and yield components of some chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2009

    Opposite direction

93 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing R. solani inoculum reduced emergence and dry matter production.

    Etiology, impact and control of rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea on the Canadian prairies · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Chickpea Avrodhi grown in plots inoculated with F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and R. solani had a 22%-25% decrease in yield.

    Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    M. incognita inoculation decreased chickpea yield by 24%.

    Laboratory and field performance of some soil bacteria used as seed treatments on Meloidogyne incognita in chickpea · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by VAMF inoculation.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    S. rolfsii reduced grain dry weight by 49%.

    ALLEVIATING STRESS OF SCLERTIUM ROLFSII ON GROWTH OF CHICKPEA VAR. BHAKKAR-2011 BY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM AND T. VIRIDE · 2021 · compared with negative control

    Opposite direction

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on nutrient uptake and biomass production.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances nutrient uptake in chickpea · 2011

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by P fertilization.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphorus fertilization did not affect chickpea yield components.

    Effect of Different Soil Tillage, Weed Control and Phosphorus Fertilization on Weed Biomas, Protein and Phosphorus Content of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2006

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    A 25% fertilizer reduction lowered chickpea seed yield by 6.6% in 2005-06.

    Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) intercropping system · 2001 · compared with RDF

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    In area 02, nitrogen fertilization did not interfere with the remaining production variables of chickpea.

    Inoculation of Bacillus spp. and nitrogen levels increase chickpea production · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fertilizer levels did not significantly affect chickpea yield attributes, grain and straw yields, or harvest index.

    Intercropping efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) based intercropping system under rainfed condition of Bihar · 2015

    Opposite direction

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.