Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chitosan nanoparticle spraying increased yield of tolerant maize under moderate drought by 42 percent.

A claim from Chitosan nanoparticles improve corn yield in differentiating maize hybrids under drought stress · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan nanoparticle spraying increased yield of tolerant maize under moderate drought by 42 percent.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
ZP6666t1
Treatment
spraying chitosan nanoparticlese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42e0
Qualifier
moderate DSt1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying chitosan nanoparticles on maize leaves increased yields by 42 and 10 percent for tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1131
t0

“Chitosan nanoparticles improve corn yield in differentiating maize hybrids under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95
t1

“The drought was maintained during the vegetative phase on two drought-contrasting maize hybrids, ZP6666 (tolerant) and Drami (sensitive), by limiting irrigation and maintaining 50% field capacity (moderate DS), and 25% field capacity (severe DS). Chitosan NPs were sprayed with 100, 200, and 300 mg L-1 corn leaves. Using 100 mg L-1 chitosan NPs significantly increased most characteristics, except RWC, which showed a non-significant response in drought-prone maize leaves. The recovery of drought was notable in both hybrids. Water stress as moderate and severe drought stress conditions reduced kernel yield/pot, while spraying chitosan nanoparticles on maize leaves increased yields by 42 and 10 percent for tolerant and 8.5 and 9 percent for sensitive hybrids at both stress conditions respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–1215

Title

Chitosan nanoparticles improve corn yield in differentiating maize hybrids under drought stress

Bekhal M. Hama Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.25130/tjas.25.2.13

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e1369d8b26171ddcaa5ea706d193c59d5b5687f15a7b6d7f3578a1a470caf740 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

chitosan · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

233 papers: 215 positive, 18 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
    Maize yield and nutrient uptake were lower under N and NP than under NPK, NPKS or NPK plus FYM.

    Soil Organic Carbon, Hydraulic Properties and Yield of Maize and Wheat under Long-term Fertilization in an Inceptisol · 2017 · compared with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (NPK) applied plot, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur (NPKS) applied plot and NPK+ farmyard manure (FYM) treatment

    Opposite direction

  8. negative

224 papers more in this group

See all 233 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.