Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc soil application without bacteria increased grain yield by 48% under drought.

A claim from Enhancing maize yield, water use efficiency, and Zn content under drought stress by applying Zn-solubilizing bacteria · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc soil application without bacteria increased grain yield by 48% under drought.

Treatment
Soil application of ZnSO 4 without bacteriae0
Outcome
grain and biological yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
48 %e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of ZnSO 4 without bacteria or foliar application of ZnSO 4 with P. aeruginosa enhanced grain and biological yield by 48 % and 8.9 % under drought stress, respectivly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1547
t0

“corn under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–390

Title

Enhancing maize yield, water use efficiency, and Zn content under drought stress by applying Zn-solubilizing bacteria

Fahimeh Khaledi; Hamidreza Balouchi; Mohsen Movahhedi Dehnavi; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2025. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109313

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-fa845cb7c9c48ef8901baff76ae6be153aa1ce21a267393841bed97983325e1d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
    M1 plus S8 was on par with M1 plus S4.

    Growth and Yield of Rabi Maize (Zea mays L.) at Different Planting Densities and N-Levels · 2017 · compared with M1 (1,00,000 plants ha-1) and S4 (300 kg N ha-1)

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

119 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

478 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

529 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

620 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.