Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

EVALUATION OF NPZn (10:50:1.5 Zn) COMPLEX FERTILIZER IN RICE WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM

Ramkala; Rita Dahiya; S. S. Dahiya; et al.

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2004–05 and 2005–06 on rice (HKR-47) and wheat (WH-711) grown in the same field. Zinc was applied @ 1.8 and 5.0 kg ha−1 through ZnSO4 and NPZn in kharif and rabi. Grain and straw yields of rice and wheat were maximum in 3.2 kg Zn through ZnSO4 + 1.8 kg Zn through NPZn. Both crops responded significantly in terms of yield attributes, number of tillers/hill and panicle weight. Phosphorus and zinc uptake in rice and wheat were found highest and significantly higher over control when Zn was applied through NPZn complex fertilizer and zinc sulphate combined. The effect of all the treatments was found non significant on N and K content but significant ontheir uptake. Agronomic efficiency of zinc for total biomass and grain yield of rice and wheat was found maximum where 5 kg Zn ha−1 was applied through both 1.8 kg through NPZn and 3.2 kg through ZnSO4. Post harvest build-up of available N, P, K and Zn was also observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain and straw yields were maximal under combined ZnSO4 and NPZn zinc application.

Treatment
3.2 kg Zn through ZnSO4 + 1.8 kg Zn through NPZne0
Outcome
Grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yields of rice and wheat were maximum in 3.2 kg Zn through ZnSO4 + 1.8 kg Zn through NPZn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain and straw yields were maximal under combined ZnSO4 and NPZn zinc application.

Treatment
3.2 kg Zn through ZnSO4 + 1.8 kg Zn through NPZne0
Outcome
Grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain and straw yields of rice and wheat were maximum in 3.2 kg Zn through ZnSO4 + 1.8 kg Zn through NPZn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice tiller number and panicle weight responded significantly to fertilizer treatment.

Treatment
NPZnt0
Outcome
number of tillers/hill and panicle weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops responded significantly in terms of yield attributes, number of tillers/hill and panicle weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“NPZn (10:50:1.5 Zn) COMPLEX FERTILIZER IN RICE WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield attributes responded significantly to fertilizer treatment.

Treatment
NPZnt0
Outcome
yield attributese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops responded significantly in terms of yield attributes, number of tillers/hill and panicle weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–416 · show in text ↑
t0

“NPZn (10:50:1.5 Zn) COMPLEX FERTILIZER IN RICE WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice phosphorus and zinc uptake were highest and significantly above control under combined NPZn and zinc sulphate.

Treatment
Zn was applied through NPZn complex fertilizer and zinc sulphate combinede0
Outcome
Phosphorus and zinc uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and zinc uptake in rice and wheat were found highest and significantly higher over control when Zn was applied through NPZn complex fertilizer and zinc sulphate combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat phosphorus and zinc uptake were highest and significantly above control under combined NPZn and zinc sulphate.

Treatment
Zn was applied through NPZn complex fertilizer and zinc sulphate combinede0
Outcome
Phosphorus and zinc uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus and zinc uptake in rice and wheat were found highest and significantly higher over control when Zn was applied through NPZn complex fertilizer and zinc sulphate combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments had no significant effect on nitrogen and potassium content in the crops.

Taxon
RICE WHEATt0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
N and K contente0
Direction
non significante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of all the treatments was found non significant on N and K content but significant ontheir uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments significantly affected nitrogen and potassium uptake.

Taxon
RICE WHEATt0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
their uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of all the treatments was found non significant on N and K content but significant ontheir uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice agronomic zinc efficiency for biomass and grain yield was maximal at combined 5 kg Zn per hectare.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha−1 was applied through both 1.8 kg through NPZn and 3.2 kg through ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiency of zinc for total biomass and grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic efficiency of zinc for total biomass and grain yield of rice and wheat was found maximum where 5 kg Zn ha−1 was applied through both 1.8 kg through NPZn and 3.2 kg through ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat agronomic zinc efficiency for biomass and grain yield was maximal at combined 5 kg Zn per hectare.

Treatment
5 kg Zn ha−1 was applied through both 1.8 kg through NPZn and 3.2 kg through ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Agronomic efficiency of zinc for total biomass and grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agronomic efficiency of zinc for total biomass and grain yield of rice and wheat was found maximum where 5 kg Zn ha−1 was applied through both 1.8 kg through NPZn and 3.2 kg through ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc built up after harvest.

Outcome
available N, P, K and Zne0
Direction
build-upe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Post harvest build-up of available N, P, K and Zn was also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–966 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

145 papers: 144 positive, 1 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

276 papers: 254 positive, 22 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

272 papers more in this group

See all 276 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.