Abstract
In order to study the effect of seed priming and zinc foliar application on yield and yield components of wheat a split factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design was conducted in 2008-2009 growing seasons in research farm of Bu-Ali Sina University. Main factor was including four foliar applications of zinc sulfate as the main plot and two wheat cultivars (Toos and Alvand) and three priming treatments including priming with water and priming with zinc sulfate and control (no priming) as sub-plot. Four foliar application treatments including control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering, booting and both tillering and booting stages were used. The results showed that total dry matter, grain yield, 1000 grain weight, spikelet number per spike and grain number per spike significantly affected by foliar application of zinc, priming and cultivars. Maximum value of mean traits in alvand cultivar was more than the Toos cultivar. Compared to control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering stage and both tillering and booting stages increased grain yield up to 9.7 and 13% and total dry matter up to 10.7 and 14.7%, respectively. Priming with water and zinc sulfate increased grain yield up to 6.9 and 2.2% and total dry matter up to 9.0 and 3.3%, respectively. There was a significant interaction effect between foliar application and priming on total dry matter, grain yield and 1000 grain weight. The highest grain yield was observed at the both tillering and booting stages of zinc foliar application and priming with water.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application at tillering raised wheat grain yield by 9.7% over no foliar application.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- foliar application at tillering stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 9.7e0
- Qualifier
- up toe0
- Comparator
- control (no foliar application)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering stage and both tillering and booting stages increased grain yield up to 9.7 and 13% and total dry matter up to 10.7 and 14.7%, respectively”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application at tillering and booting raised wheat grain yield by 13% over no foliar application.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both tillering and booting stagese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13%e0
- Qualifier
- up toe0
- Comparator
- control (no foliar application)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering stage and both tillering and booting stages increased grain yield up to 9.7 and 13% and total dry matter up to 10.7 and 14.7%, respectively”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application at tillering raised wheat total dry matter by 10.7% over no foliar application.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application at tillering stagee0
- Outcome
- total dry mattere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 10.7e0
- Qualifier
- up toe0
- Comparator
- control (no foliar application)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering stage and both tillering and booting stages increased grain yield up to 9.7 and 13% and total dry matter up to 10.7 and 14.7%, respectively”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application at tillering and booting raised wheat total dry matter by 14.7% over no foliar application.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both tillering and booting stagese0
- Outcome
- total dry mattere0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.7%e0
- Qualifier
- up toe0
- Comparator
- control (no foliar application)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to control (no foliar application), foliar application at tillering stage and both tillering and booting stages increased grain yield up to 9.7 and 13% and total dry matter up to 10.7 and 14.7%, respectively”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming with water raised wheat grain yield by 6.9% over unprimed control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- priming with watere1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 6.9e1
- Qualifier
- up toe1
- Comparator
- control (no priming)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Priming with water and zinc sulfate increased grain yield up to 6.9 and 2.2% and total dry matter up to 9.0 and 3.3%, respectively”
e2“priming with water and priming with zinc sulfate and control (no priming)”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming with zinc sulfate raised wheat grain yield by 2.2% over unprimed control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- zinc sulfatee1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 2.2%e1
- Qualifier
- up toe1
- Comparator
- control (no priming)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Priming with water and zinc sulfate increased grain yield up to 6.9 and 2.2% and total dry matter up to 9.0 and 3.3%, respectively”
e2“priming with water and priming with zinc sulfate and control (no priming)”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming with water raised wheat total dry matter by 9.0% over unprimed control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- priming with watere1
- Outcome
- total dry mattere1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 9.0e1
- Qualifier
- up toe1
- Comparator
- control (no priming)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Priming with water and zinc sulfate increased grain yield up to 6.9 and 2.2% and total dry matter up to 9.0 and 3.3%, respectively”
e2“priming with water and priming with zinc sulfate and control (no priming)”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Priming with zinc sulfate raised wheat total dry matter by 3.3% over unprimed control.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- zinc sulfatee1
- Outcome
- total dry mattere1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 3.3%e1
- Qualifier
- up toe1
- Comparator
- control (no priming)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Priming with water and zinc sulfate increased grain yield up to 6.9 and 2.2% and total dry matter up to 9.0 and 3.3%, respectively”
e2“priming with water and priming with zinc sulfate and control (no priming)”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar zinc and priming interact significantly on total dry matter, grain yield and 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application and priminge3
- Outcome
- total dry matter, grain yield and 1000 grain weighte3
- Direction
- significant interaction effecte3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“There was a significant interaction effect between foliar application and priming on total dry matter, grain yield and 1000 grain weight”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was highest with zinc foliar application at both tillering and booting combined with priming with water.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- both tillering and booting stages of zinc foliar application and priming with watere4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The highest grain yield was observed at the both tillering and booting stages of zinc foliar application and priming with water”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Alvand had higher mean trait values than Toos.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- alvande5
- Outcome
- mean traitse5
- Direction
- was more thane5
- Comparator
- Toose5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Maximum value of mean traits in alvand cultivar was more than the Toos cultivar”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application, priming and cultivar significantly affected total dry matter, grain yield and 1000-grain weight.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of zinc, priming and cultivarse6
- Outcome
- total dry matter, grain yield, 1000 grain weighte6
- Direction
- significantly affectede6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“total dry matter, grain yield, 1000 grain weight, spikelet number per spike and grain number per spike significantly affected by foliar application of zinc, priming and cultivars”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc foliar application, priming and cultivar significantly affected spikelet and grain number per spike.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- foliar application of zinc, priming and cultivarse6
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and grain number per spikee6
- Direction
- significantly affectede6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“total dry matter, grain yield, 1000 grain weight, spikelet number per spike and grain number per spike significantly affected by foliar application of zinc, priming and cultivars”
t0“two wheat Cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
303 papers more in this group
See all 307 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.