Paper · 2016 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Study of the Biochemical Responses and Enzymatic Activity of GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock to In Vitro Salinity Stress

M. Mashayekhi; M.E. Amiri; F. Habibi

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Introduction: Salinity is the most significant abiotic factor limiting crop productivity and several physiological responses, including modification of ion balance, water status, mineral nutrition, stomatal behavior, photosynthetic efficiency and so on. The GF677 (Prunuspersica×Prunusamygdalus) is widelyusedas rootstock for peach and almond. It is mainly used as a rootstock because of its resistance to drought, calcic soil and Fe deficiency. Nowadays, using tissue culture techniques is very popular for the selection of plant resistant to abiotic stress (in vitro salinity); because in vitro conditions are more controllable than in vivo conditions and the large number of genotypes can be evaluated in a limited space. For example, in the field, plants are exposed to variable biological and climatic conditions which result in some interaction effects. In other words, the nutrition and climatic effects are easily controllable in the in vitro conditions all over the year. The objective of this study is to identify biochemical markers of salinity stress of GF677 rootstock under in vitro conditions. Materials and Methods: Plantlets of GF677 rootstock were subcultured into the Murashige and Skoog (MS) proliferation medium containing1 mg/l BA (6-Benzyladenine)and 0.1 mg/l NAA (naphthaline acetic acid) with different concentrations (0, 40, 80 and 120 mM) of sodium chloride (NaCl) with four replicates. Cultures were transferred to the growth chamber with temperature of 25±2°C, relative humidity of 70%, under a 16/8 h (day/night) photoperiod. Data were collected at the end of the experiment (6th weeks). Antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content, soluble sugars, and Na and Cl were measured. The experiments were set up in a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replicates (a vessel in each replicate) and statistical analysis was performed using MSTAT-C program. Means were separated according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (DNMRT) at 0.05 level of probability. Results and Discussion: After six weeks, the results showed that by increasing salinity levelsin the culture medium, antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content and soluble sugars increased significantly. The antioxidant enzyme activities (catalase and peroxidase) were increased significantly in the GF677 rootstock by increasing salinity levels. Catalase activity increased with increasing salinity levels, such that the maximum value (0.61 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]) was observed in 80 mM sodium chloride treatment. The lowest catalase activity (0.11 mg [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]) was observed in 120 mM. The highest of peroxidase enzyme activity (0.109 and 0.105 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]), was obtained in 80 and 40 mM, respectively. Also, by increasing the salinity level, total protein content increased significantly in GF677 plantlets. The highest total protein was observed in 80 mM sodium chloride. By increasing salinity levels, proline content increased compared to the control at the GF677 rootstock, but no significant difference was observed between salinity levels. The highest accumulation of proline was obtained in 80 and 120 mM, respectively, while the lowest proline was obtained in control. By increasing salinity levels, soluble sugars increased in GF677 rootstock. The highest accumulation of soluble sugars was obtained in 80 mM. By increasing salinity levels in the cultural medium, the uptakeof sodium (Na+) and chlorine (Cl-) significantly increased in GF677 rootstocks over the six-week culture period. The highest uptake of Na and Cl ions in plant tissue was observed in 4th week. The results showed that with increasing salinity levels (80 to 120 mM), leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD unit) decreased in GF677 rootstock. The lowest chlorophyll index was observed in 120 mM treatment, while the highest leaf chlorophyll index was obtained in the control treatment. Conclusion: According to the results and analysis of biochemical and enzymatic responses,it can be concluded that GF677 is a concentration tolerant to salinity up to 120 mM. The highest amount of biochemical responses and enzymatic activity was observed at 80 mM, where the continued growth of the plant was in terms of salinity. The rootstock was due to antioxidant defense mechanisms such as antioxidant systems, osmotic adjustment by proline and soluble sugars and increasing protein synthesis can sustain growth even under salinity conditions, as a tolerant rootstock was used for peach and almond cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly increased catalase and peroxidase activities.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelsin the culture mediume0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levelsin the culture medium, antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content and soluble sugars increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2296 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly increased total protein content.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelsin the culture mediume0
Outcome
total protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levelsin the culture medium, antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content and soluble sugars increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2296 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly increased proline content.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelsin the culture mediume0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levelsin the culture medium, antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content and soluble sugars increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2296 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly increased soluble sugars.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelsin the culture mediume0
Outcome
soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levelsin the culture medium, antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase and peroxidase),total protein content, proline content and soluble sugars increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2296 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity peaked at 0.61 in 80 mM sodium chloride.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80 mM sodium chloride treatmente0
Gene
Catalasee1
Outcome
maximum valuee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
0.61 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum value (0.61 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]) was observed in 80 mM sodium chloride treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2516–2612 · show in text ↑
e1

“Catalase activity increased with increasing salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2441–2500 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase activity was lowest at 120 mM sodium chloride.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
120 mMe0
Outcome
catalase activitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.11 mg [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest catalase activity (0.11 mg [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]) was observed in 120 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2703 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity was highest at 80 mM, with a value of 0.109.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80e0
Outcome
peroxidase enzyme activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.109e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest of peroxidase enzyme activity (0.109 and 0.105 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]), was obtained in 80 and 40 mM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2709–2836 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity at 40 mM was reported as 0.105.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
40 mMe0
Outcome
peroxidase enzyme activitye0
Value
0.105 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase enzyme activity (0.109 and 0.105 [abs/min /mg protein (f.m)]), was obtained in 80 and 40 mM, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2720–2836 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total protein was highest at 80 mM sodium chloride.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80 mM sodium chloridee0
Outcome
total proteine0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest total protein was observed in 80 mM sodium chloride”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3007 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content rose against control, without significant differences among salinity levels.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677e0
Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content increased compared to the control at the GF677 rootstock, but no significant difference was observed between salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3040–3180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach and Almond Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline accumulation was highest at 80 and 120 mM and lowest in control.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80 and 120 mMe0
Outcome
accumulation of prolinee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest accumulation of proline was obtained in 80 and 120 mM, respectively, while the lowest proline was obtained in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3186–3311 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugars were highest at 80 mM.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80 mMe0
Outcome
accumulation of soluble sugarse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest accumulation of soluble sugars was obtained in 80 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3393–3453 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased sodium uptake.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677e0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelse0
Outcome
uptakeof sodium (Na+)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levels in the cultural medium, the uptakeof sodium (Na+) and chlorine (Cl-) significantly increased in GF677 rootstocks”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 3455–3597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach and Almond Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased chlorine uptake.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677e0
Treatment
increasing salinity levelse0
Outcome
chlorine (Cl-)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by increasing salinity levels in the cultural medium, the uptakeof sodium (Na+) and chlorine (Cl-) significantly increased in GF677 rootstocks”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 3455–3597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach and Almond Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium and chlorine uptake peaked in the fourth week.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Outcome
uptake of Na and Cl ionse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
4th weeke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest uptake of Na and Cl ions in plant tissue was observed in 4th week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3636–3709 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising salinity from 80 to 120 mM decreased leaf chlorophyll index.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677e0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
increasing salinity levels (80 to 120 mM)e0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD unit)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with increasing salinity levels (80 to 120 mM), leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD unit) decreased in GF677 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3735–3846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach and Almond Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll index was lowest at 120 mM and highest in control.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
120 mM treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest chlorophyll index was observed in 120 mM treatment, while the highest leaf chlorophyll index was obtained in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3852–3989 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded GF677 tolerates salinity to 120 mM.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677e0
Outcome
tolerant to salinitye0
Value
120 mMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GF677 is a concentration tolerant to salinity up to 120 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4105–4163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach and Almond Hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochemical and enzymatic responses were greatest at 80 mM, where growth continued.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Treatment
80 mMe0
Outcome
biochemical responses and enzymatic activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest amount of biochemical responses and enzymatic activity was observed at 80 mM, where the continued growth of the plant was in terms of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4169–4319 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed sustained growth under salinity to antioxidant defenses, osmotic adjustment and protein synthesis.

Taxon
Peach and AlmondPrunus dulcisPrunus persicat0
Material
GF677t0
Outcome
sustain growthe0
Qualifier
antioxidant defense mechanisms such as antioxidant systems, osmotic adjustment by proline and soluble sugars and increasing protein synthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant defense mechanisms such as antioxidant systems, osmotic adjustment by proline and soluble sugars and increasing protein synthesis can sustain growth even under salinity conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4346–4537 · show in text ↑
t0

“GF677 (Peach and Almond Hybrid) Rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–102 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: osmolytes · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: ion balance · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.