Paper · 2016 · Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology

Effect of Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Postharvest Quality of Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa During Storage

Omer Hafeez; Aman Ullah Malik; Muhammad Shafique Khalid; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) technology is gaining popularity worldwide for its potential of extending shelf life of fresh produce with better fruit quality. Effect of MAP (using Xtend® bags), was investigated on postharvest storage life and quality of mango cvs Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa stored at 11°C with 80-85% RH for 4 and 5 weeks respectively, in comparison with un-bagged (control) fruit. Uniform physiological mature fruit of Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa were harvested from a commercial mango orchard along with 4-5 cm long pedicel and were de-sapped in 0.5% lime solution (to avoid sap burn injury). Later on fruit were given cold water fungicidal dip (Sportak @ 0.5ml/L, Active Ingredient: Prochloraz) followed by hot water treatment (52°C; 5 min). After shade drying and pre-cooling (11°C; 10-12 hours), fruit were packed according to the treatment combination and stored at 11°C. Fruit of both varieties were removed after 2, 3 and 4 weeks of storage followed by ripening at 24±2°C with an additional removal after 5 weeks for Sufaid Chaunsa only. Fruit quality was evaluated for various bio-chemical, organoleptic and physical parameters at two stages of ripening (at removal day and at final ripening day). Fruit of both varieties stored in MAP exhibited better firmness and retained green colour as compared to un-bagged fruit. Quality of fruit subjected to postharvest fungicidal application and hot water treatments and stored under MAP at 11°C showed better peel colour development and less disease development. Moreover, storage durations and post storage ripening stages significantly affected fruit peel colour, textural softness and disease development. Further, cv. Sindhri showed better storage potential with lower disease incidence as compared to cv. Sufaid Chaunsa which warrants further studies on disease control aspects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango fruit stored in MAP had better firmness than un-bagged fruit.

Treatment
MAPe1
Outcome
firmnesse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
un-bagged fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruit of both varieties stored in MAP exhibited better firmness and retained green colour as compared to un-bagged fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango fruit stored in MAP retained more green colour than un-bagged fruit.

Treatment
MAPe1
Outcome
green coloure1
Direction
retainede1
Comparator
un-bagged fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fruit of both varieties stored in MAP exhibited better firmness and retained green colour as compared to un-bagged fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest fungicide and hot water treatments stored under MAP gave better peel colour development.

Treatment
postharvest fungicidal application and hot water treatments and stored under MAPe2
Outcome
peel colour developmente2
Direction
bettere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Quality of fruit subjected to postharvest fungicidal application and hot water treatments and stored under MAP at 11°C showed better peel colour development and less disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest fungicide and hot water treatments stored under MAP gave less disease development in mango.

Treatment
postharvest fungicidal application and hot water treatments and stored under MAPe2
Outcome
disease developmente2
Direction
lesse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Quality of fruit subjected to postharvest fungicidal application and hot water treatments and stored under MAP at 11°C showed better peel colour development and less disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage duration and post-storage ripening stage significantly affected peel colour, textural softness and disease development in mango.

Treatment
storage durations and post storage ripening stagese3
Outcome
fruit peel colour, textural softness and disease developmente3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Moreover, storage durations and post storage ripening stages significantly affected fruit peel colour, textural softness and disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cv. Sindhri had better storage potential than cv. Sufaid Chaunsa.

Material
cv. Sindhrie4
Outcome
storage potentiale4
Direction
bettere4
Comparator
cv. Sufaid Chaunsae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Further, cv. Sindhri showed better storage potential with lower disease incidence as compared to cv. Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cv. Sindhri had lower disease incidence than cv. Sufaid Chaunsa.

Material
cv. Sindhrie4
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
cv. Sufaid Chaunsae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Further, cv. Sindhri showed better storage potential with lower disease incidence as compared to cv. Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango cvs. Sindhri and Sufaid Chaunsa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–103 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

40 papers: 33 positive, 7 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fungicide · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

storage · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 105 positive, 4 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

fungicide · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.