Paper · 1989 · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)

Physiological studies of bitter pit in apple

Guy W. Witney

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a series of related experiment: some aspects of the histology and physiology of the disorder bitter pit in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) were studied. A two year field study was conducted to induce consistent bitter pit development in type ’Delicious’ (D) and ’Golden Delicious’ (GD) apple fruit. Multiple spray treatments of CaCl₂ and MgCl₂, combined with paper bag fruit covers, were applied and subsequent bitter pit development examined. The main effect of bags in both cultivars was increased pit development, decreased Ca in fruit and increased fruit K. CaCl₂ sprays resulted in less pit development, increased Ca in fruit, and less fruit Mg. MgCl₂ sprays resulted in increased bitter pit, decreased fruit Ca, and increased fruit Mg. Overall, field treatments provided a wide range of bitter pit incidence after storage, from 100% (bag and MgCl₂ spray combined) to 3% (CaCl₂ spray alone) in both D and GD. The cellular morphology of pitted apple fruit from field trees was examined using transmission and scanning electron microscopy. The overall tissue morphology of both cultivars was similar, but in pitted tissues differences were observed in tannin localization, starch hydrolysis, and cell wall morphology. Cation levels in the tissues were examined using X-ray microanalysis. High Mg levels were localized in pit cells, while K levels were similar in both healthy and pitted cells. Ca levels in both tissue types were too low to be detected by this method. Using ’Golden Delicious’ fruit from the field study, the relationship between pyruvate kinase activity, fruit cation concentration and bitter pit was investigated. Pyruvate kinase activity during early fruit growth was higher in fruit which developed 100% bitter pit after storage (MgCl, spray + bag), than in fruit that developed 3% bitter pit (CaCl₂ spray). Fruit with a high bitter pit incidence had a lower Ca: Mg + K ratio than fruit with a low level of the disorder. There was a strong positive correlation between enzyme activity early in the season and bitter pit incidence alter storage. An assay for pyruvate kinase may be valuable for early prediction of postharvest bitter pit development. Finally, the qualitative electrophoretic patterns of soluble fruit proteins from each treatment were examined starting early in the season and continuing until termination of fruit storage. Patterns from all treatments were almost identical throughout the season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit bags increased pit development in both cultivars.

Treatment
bagse0
Outcome
pit developmente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main effect of bags in both cultivars was increased pit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit bags decreased fruit Ca.

Treatment
bagse1
Outcome
Ca in fruite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased Ca in fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main effect of bags in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit bags increased fruit K.

Treatment
bagse1
Outcome
fruit Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased fruit K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main effect of bags in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl₂ sprays reduced pit development.

Treatment
CaCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
pit developmente0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl₂ sprays resulted in less pit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–609 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl₂ sprays increased fruit Ca.

Treatment
CaCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
Ca in fruite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl₂ sprays resulted in less pit development, increased Ca in fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl₂ sprays reduced fruit Mg.

Treatment
CaCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
fruit Mge0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaCl₂ sprays resulted in less pit development, increased Ca in fruit, and less fruit Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MgCl₂ sprays increased bitter pit.

Treatment
MgCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
bitter pite0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MgCl₂ sprays resulted in increased bitter pit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MgCl₂ sprays decreased fruit Ca.

Treatment
MgCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
fruit Cae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MgCl₂ sprays resulted in increased bitter pit, decreased fruit Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MgCl₂ sprays increased fruit Mg.

Treatment
MgCl₂ sprayse0
Outcome
fruit Mge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MgCl₂ sprays resulted in increased bitter pit, decreased fruit Ca, and increased fruit Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bag plus MgCl₂ spray produced 100% bitter pit after storage.

Treatment
bag and MgCl₂ spray combinede0
Outcome
bitter pit incidence after storagee0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
CaCl₂ spray alonee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bitter pit incidence after storage, from 100% (bag and MgCl₂ spray combined) to 3% (CaCl₂ spray alone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl₂ spray alone produced 3% bitter pit after storage.

Treatment
CaCl₂ spray alonee0
Outcome
bitter pit incidence after storagee0
Value
3%e0
Comparator
bag and MgCl₂ spray combinede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bitter pit incidence after storage, from 100% (bag and MgCl₂ spray combined) to 3% (CaCl₂ spray alone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitted tissues differed in tannin localization, starch hydrolysis and cell-wall morphology.

Outcome
differences were observed in tannin localization, starch hydrolysis, and cell wall morphologye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in pitted tissues differences were observed in tannin localization, starch hydrolysis, and cell wall morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High Mg levels were localized in pit cells.

Organ / stage
pit cellse0
Outcome
High Mg levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High Mg levels were localized in pit cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K levels were similar in healthy and pitted cells.

Outcome
K levelse0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K levels were similar in both healthy and pitted cells”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca levels were too low for X-ray microanalysis detection in both tissue types.

Outcome
Ca levelse0
Comparator
both tissue typese0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca levels in both tissue types were too low to be detected by this method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1472 · show in text ↑
e1

“using X-ray microanalysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early pyruvate kinase activity was higher in fruit that later developed 100% bitter pit than in fruit that developed 3%.

Gene
Pyruvate kinasee0
Outcome
Pyruvate kinase activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fruit that developed 3% bitter pite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyruvate kinase activity during early fruit growth was higher in fruit which developed 100% bitter pit after storage (MgCl, spray + bag), than in fruit that developed 3% bitter pit (CaCl₂ spray)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High bitter-pit fruit had a lower Ca: Mg + K ratio than low-incidence fruit.

Outcome
Ca: Mg + K ratioe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fruit with a low level of the disordere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit with a high bitter pit incidence had a lower Ca: Mg + K ratio than fruit with a low level of the disorder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early enzyme activity correlated positively with bitter-pit incidence after storage.

Organ / stage
early in the seasone0
Outcome
bitter pit incidence alter storagee0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
enzyme activity early in the seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a strong positive correlation between enzyme activity early in the season and bitter pit incidence alter storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a pyruvate kinase assay for early prediction of postharvest bitter pit.

Gene
pyruvate kinasee0
Outcome
early prediction of postharvest bitter pit developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An assay for pyruvate kinase may be valuable for early prediction of postharvest bitter pit development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2174 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble fruit protein electrophoretic patterns were almost identical across treatments throughout the season.

Outcome
qualitative electrophoretic patterns of soluble fruit proteinse1
Direction
almost identicale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Patterns from all treatments were almost identical throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2366–2438 · show in text ↑
e1

“qualitative electrophoretic patterns of soluble fruit proteins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2189–2251 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 80 positive, 27 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 76 positive, 31 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.