Paper · 2023 · Vestnik of Kazan state agrarin university

FEATURES OF THE INFLUENCE OF LEAF FEEDING WITH LIQUID FERTILIZERS ON MINERAL NUTRITION, PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT SEEDS

Il'shat Vafin; Radik Safin; Rogat Minikaev; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The research was carried out in order to study the effect of top dressing with liquid fertilizers on mineral nutrition, yield and quality of seeds of winter wheat of Kazanskaya 560 varietiy in seed crops. The work was carried out in 2017–2020 in Kama zone of the Republic of Tatarstan on gray forest soil, characterized by a very low supply of molybdenum, low - zinc, high - copper and manganese, very high - boron. Liquid fertilizers of the Metallocene series containing macro- and microelements were studied. Top dressing was carried out in three terms: the first - in the autumn period with manganese-containing fertilizer Metallocene D with a norm of 1.0 l/ha, the second - during the spring regrowth, the third - in the heading phase with fertilizers with copper (grade A), zinc (grade B), molybdenum and boron (grade C) at rates of 1.0 l/ha. The consumption of working fluid during spraying is 200 l/ha. In 2018 and 2019 dry conditions were noted, in 2020 - favorable for winter wheat. Double foliar application with zinc fertilizer increased the yield by 0.18 t/ha, boron and molybdenum - by 0.16 t/ha. Autumn top dressing with manganese increased the grain harvest by 0.67 t/ha, and against its background with molybdenum-boron fertilizer - by another 0.15 t/ha. Foliar feeding led to an increase in the content and removal of phosphorus from 1 ton of winter wheat seeds. Microfertilizers increased the laboratory germination of seeds of a new crop by 3.1...5.4%, and also reduced their infection with phytopathogenic micromycetes by 1.2...23.0 times. The minimal infection of the seeds of a new crop with fungi causing root rot in the experiment was noted when using the copper-containing fertilizer Metallocene against the background of the autumn application of manganese. The most cost-effective on seed crops of winter wheat were double foliar feeding with molybdenum and boron in combination with the autumn application of manganese (profitability - 71%, against 39% in control).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double zinc foliar application increased yield by 0.18 t/ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Double foliar application with zinc fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.18 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Double foliar application with zinc fertilizer increased the yield by 0.18 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron and molybdenum foliar application increased yield by 0.16 t/ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
boron and molybdenume0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
0.16 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“boron and molybdenum - by 0.16 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Double foliar application with zinc fertilizer increased the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn manganese top dressing increased grain harvest by 0.67 t/ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Autumn top dressing with manganesee0
Outcome
grain harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.67 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Autumn top dressing with manganese increased the grain harvest by 0.67 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum-boron fertilizer after manganese added 0.15 t/ha.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molybdenum-boron fertilizere0
Outcome
grain harveste1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
0.15 t/hae0
Comparator
its backgrounde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“against its background with molybdenum-boron fertilizer - by another 0.15 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased the grain harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding increased phosphorus content and removal from seed.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
Foliar feedinge0
Outcome
content and removal of phosphoruse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar feeding led to an increase in the content and removal of phosphorus from 1 ton of winter wheat seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microfertilizers increased laboratory seed germination by 3.1...5.4%.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Microfertilizerse0
Outcome
laboratory germination of seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.1...5.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Microfertilizers increased the laboratory germination of seeds of a new crop by 3.1...5.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microfertilizers reduced seed infection by micromycetes 1.2...23.0 times.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Microfertilizerse0
Interactor
phytopathogenic micromycetese0
Outcome
infection with phytopathogenic micromycetese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.2...23.0 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“Microfertilizers increased the laboratory germination of seeds of a new crop by 3.1...5.4%, and also reduced their infection with phytopathogenic micromycetes by 1.2...23.0 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper fertilizer after manganese gave minimal seed infection by root-rot fungi.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
copper-containing fertilizer Metallocenee0
Interactor
fungi causing root rote0
Outcome
infection of the seeds of a new crop with fungi causing root rote0
Direction
minimale0
Comparator
autumn application of manganesee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“The minimal infection of the seeds of a new crop with fungi causing root rot in the experiment was noted when using the copper-containing fertilizer Metallocene against the background of the autumn application of manganese.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum and boron with autumn manganese gave 71% profitability versus 39% control.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
double foliar feeding with molybdenum and boron in combination with the autumn application of manganesee0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
71%e0
Qualifier
39%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–128 · show in text ↑
e0

“double foliar feeding with molybdenum and boron in combination with the autumn application of manganese (profitability - 71%, against 39% in control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1992 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

micronutrient · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.