Abstract
A field experiment entitled “Effect of foliar application of nano urea, nano DAP and growth regulator on growth, yield and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under inceptisol.” Was carried out at experimental farm, department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Badnapur during Rabi 2023-24. The field trial was conducted in Randomised Block Design with ten treatments (T1) Absolute control, (T2) 100% NPK (RDF), (T3) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS, (T4) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS, (T5) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP 45 DAS, (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS, (T7) 50% RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS, (T8) 50% RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS, (T9) 50% RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP 45 DAS and (T10) 50% RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS which was included with three replications. According to the result obtained by the field investigation clearly indicated that the growth, yield, quality, nutrient content and uptake were significantly impacted due to foliar spray of nano urea, nano DAP and growth regulator along with 75% NPK. The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS. In the context of grain quality, the findings indicated that higher protein content (24.04%) was also found in same treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced the highest chickpea plant height (54.17 cm).
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 54.17 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced the highest chickpea number of branches (6.13).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- number of branchese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 6.13e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced the highest chickpea number of pods plant-1 (35.61).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 35.61e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced the highest chickpea grain yield (1538.89 kg ha-1).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 produced the highest chickpea straw yield (3663.20 kg ha-1).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest plant height (54.17 cm), number of branches (6.13), number of pods plant-1 (35.61), maximum grain and straw yield (1538.89 and 3663.20 kg ha-1) at harvest were recorded in treatment (T6) 75%RDF + 0:52:34 (0.5% spray) + nano Urea + nano DAP + GA 50 ppm 45 DAS”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same T6 treatment produced higher chickpea grain protein content of 24.04%.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- same treatmente0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 24.04%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the context of grain quality, the findings indicated that higher protein content (24.04%) was also found in same treatment”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →nitrogen · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
33 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.