Paper · 2025 · Discover Plants.

Mitigation of salinity stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae) in the Sundarbans Delta Region of India

Varsha Kundu; Moushree Sarkar; Sabyasachi Kundagrami

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salinity stress poses a significant threat to crop productivity, particularly in coastal regions such as the Sundarbans Delta in India. This study investigates the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), specifically Glomus mosseae , in mitigating salinity-induced stress in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Six high-yielding desi-type chickpea lines, including one tolerant (Digbijoy), three moderately susceptible (IC 268971, Radhey, Mahamaya 1), and two highly susceptible (Virat, DCP 93-3), were selected for evaluation under controlled greenhouse and field conditions. Salinity stress was induced at 300 mM NaCl in pot experiments, while field trials were conducted in naturally saline soil. Results indicated that salinity significantly reduced key agro-morphological parameters, including seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area index, plant height, branches, pods plant −1 , pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant −1 . However, AMF inoculation mitigated these adverse effects, improving seedling emergence by 45%, plant height by 52%, pod number by 95%, and seed yield by 48% in field conditions. Additionally, AMF inoculation under salinity increased spore population by 535% and structural colonization (mycelium by 181% and arbuscules by 204%). Biochemical traits such as total phenolic content, relative water content, membrane stability index, and chlorophyll levels improved significantly in AMF-treated plants compared to those under saline conditions alone. The observed improvements ultimately led to a notable enhancement in grain yield, demonstrating the efficacy of Glomus mosseae in alleviating the adverse effects of salinity stress in chickpea. These results emphasize the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) as a viable, environmentally friendly solution to boost chickpea production under saline conditions, presenting a valuable tool for promoting climate-resilient farming in salt-affected areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced seedling length, nodules per plant, and leaf area index.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity significantly reduced key agro-morphological parameters, including seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area index, plant height, branches, pods plant −1 , pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced plant height, branches, and pods per plant.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
plant height, branches, pods plant −1e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity significantly reduced key agro-morphological parameters, including seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area index, plant height, branches, pods plant −1 , pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced pod length, seeds per pod, and 100-seed weight.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity significantly reduced key agro-morphological parameters, including seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area index, plant height, branches, pods plant −1 , pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced seed yield per plant.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
seed yield plant −1e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity significantly reduced key agro-morphological parameters, including seedling length, nodules plant −1 , leaf area index, plant height, branches, pods plant −1 , pod length, seeds pod −1 , 100-seed weight, and seed yield plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved seedling emergence by 45% under field conditions.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
45%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation mitigated these adverse effects, improving seedling emergence by 45%, plant height by 52%, pod number by 95%, and seed yield by 48% in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved plant height by 52% under field conditions.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
52%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation mitigated these adverse effects, improving seedling emergence by 45%, plant height by 52%, pod number by 95%, and seed yield by 48% in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved pod number by 95% under field conditions.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
pod numbere0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
95%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation mitigated these adverse effects, improving seedling emergence by 45%, plant height by 52%, pod number by 95%, and seed yield by 48% in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation improved seed yield by 48% under field conditions.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculatione0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
improvinge0
Value
48%e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation mitigated these adverse effects, improving seedling emergence by 45%, plant height by 52%, pod number by 95%, and seed yield by 48% in field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation under salinity increased spore population by 535%.

Taxon
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaet0
Treatment
AMF inoculation under salinitye0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
spore populatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
535%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation under salinity increased spore population by 535% and structural colonization (mycelium by 181% and arbuscules by 204%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation under salinity increased mycelial colonization by 181%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculation under salinitye0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
myceliume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
181%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation under salinity increased spore population by 535% and structural colonization (mycelium by 181% and arbuscules by 204%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculation under salinity increased arbuscule colonization by 204%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF inoculation under salinitye0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
arbusculese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
204%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF inoculation under salinity increased spore population by 535% and structural colonization (mycelium by 181% and arbuscules by 204%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF treatment significantly improved total phenolic content, relative water content, and membrane stability under salinity.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF-treatede0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
total phenolic content, relative water content, membrane stability indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
those under saline conditions alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochemical traits such as total phenolic content, relative water content, membrane stability index, and chlorophyll levels improved significantly in AMF-treated plants compared to those under saline conditions alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF treatment significantly improved chlorophyll levels under salinity.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
AMF-treatede0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll levelse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
those under saline conditions alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochemical traits such as total phenolic content, relative water content, membrane stability index, and chlorophyll levels improved significantly in AMF-treated plants compared to those under saline conditions alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62 · show in text ↑

salinity · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salinity · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

66 papers: 6 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

salinity · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 15 positive, 13 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.