Paper · 2026 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China: a meta-analysis of effects and management practices

Xiaohe Jiang; Heli Cao; Ruopu Wang; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Saline irrigation is an effective way to alleviate water scarcity in agriculture, but its productivity is constrained by salt stress. The effects of salinity on wheat yield and water productivity (WP), and how management practices can mitigate these effects, remain inadequately quantified. Methods: Through a meta-analysis of 2265 observations from field studies in Northern China, we quantified the responses of wheat yield, WP, and associated traits to saline irrigation and evaluated the efficacy of key management practices. Results: The wheat yield (-16.3%) and WP (-13.7%) were significantly reduced under saline irrigation. Salt stress primarily inhibited photosynthetic rate (Pn), which subsequently reduced leaf area index (LAI) and plant height (PH), ultimately restricting spike number (SN) and yield, while constraining WP. A salinity threshold of 5 g/L was identified, beyond which the declines in yield and WP became severe. Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation ameliorated stress, increasing PH (+12.1%), SN (+7.4%), yield (+5.9%), and WP (+13.1%). Similarly, straw returning increased SN (+11.3%), yield (+12.3%), and WP (+12.5%). Discussion: This study clarified the physiological cascade from salt stress to yield loss and confirm the critical role of the 5 g/L salinity threshold in sustaining wheat productivity. Alternate irrigation and straw returning mitigate salt stress through complementary pathways, enhancing plant growth and yield components. This meta-analysis provides evidence-based insights for optimizing saline irrigation management, supporting sustainable wheat production in water-scarce, salt-affected regions of northern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was significantly reduced by 16.3% under saline irrigation.

Treatment
saline irrigatione1
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
-16.3%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The wheat yield (-16.3%) and WP (-13.7%) were significantly reduced under saline irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat water productivity was significantly reduced by 13.7% under saline irrigation.

Treatment
saline irrigatione1
Outcome
WPe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
-13.7%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The wheat yield (-16.3%) and WP (-13.7%) were significantly reduced under saline irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress primarily inhibited photosynthetic rate, which reduced leaf area index and plant height, ultimately restricting spike number and yield and constraining water productivity.

Treatment
Salt stresse1
Outcome
restricting spike number (SN) and yielde1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Salt stress primarily inhibited photosynthetic rate (Pn), which subsequently reduced leaf area index (LAI) and plant height (PH), ultimately restricting spike number (SN) and yield, while constraining WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A salinity threshold of 5 g/L was identified, beyond which declines in yield and water productivity became severe.

Outcome
declines in yield and WPe1
Value
5 g/Le1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A salinity threshold of 5 g/L was identified, beyond which the declines in yield and WP became severe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation increased plant height by 12.1%.

Treatment
Alternate saline and freshwater irrigatione1
Outcome
PHe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
+12.1%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation ameliorated stress, increasing PH (+12.1%), SN (+7.4%), yield (+5.9%), and WP (+13.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation increased spike number by 7.4%.

Treatment
Alternate saline and freshwater irrigatione1
Outcome
SNe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
+7.4%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation ameliorated stress, increasing PH (+12.1%), SN (+7.4%), yield (+5.9%), and WP (+13.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation increased yield by 5.9%.

Treatment
Alternate saline and freshwater irrigatione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
+5.9%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation ameliorated stress, increasing PH (+12.1%), SN (+7.4%), yield (+5.9%), and WP (+13.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation increased water productivity by 13.1%.

Treatment
Alternate saline and freshwater irrigatione1
Outcome
WPe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
+13.1%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Alternate saline and freshwater irrigation ameliorated stress, increasing PH (+12.1%), SN (+7.4%), yield (+5.9%), and WP (+13.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning increased spike number by 11.3%.

Treatment
straw returninge1
Outcome
SNe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
+11.3%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw returning increased SN (+11.3%), yield (+12.3%), and WP (+12.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning increased yield by 12.3%.

Treatment
straw returninge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
+12.3%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw returning increased SN (+11.3%), yield (+12.3%), and WP (+12.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw returning increased water productivity by 12.5%.

Treatment
straw returninge1
Outcome
WPe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
+12.5%e1
Setting
Northern Chinat0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“straw returning increased SN (+11.3%), yield (+12.3%), and WP (+12.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat water productivity under saline irrigation in Northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–66 · show in text ↑

organic · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 327 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.