Solanum tuberosum · Potato virus X · Nicotiana benthamiana
30 claims from these papers; 11 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
11 citations between these papers: 10 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 2
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 23
- negative
ORF6 of Tobacco mosaic virus is a determinant of viral pathogenicity in Nicotiana benthamiana · 2004
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
The Unfolded Protein Response Is Triggered by a Plant Viral Movement Protein · 2011
- negative
- negative
NSvc4 and CP Proteins Contribute to the Pathogenicity of Rice Stripe Virus · 2013
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
Identification of Strawberry vein banding virus encoded P6 as an RNA silencing suppressor · 2018
- negative
- negative
- negative
Characterization of Pathogenicity-Associated V2 Protein of Tobacco Curly Shoot Virus · 2021
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
The nanovirus U2 protein suppresses RNA silencing via three conserved cysteine residues · 2023
- negative
Two distinct viral suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by citrus tatter leaf virus · 2024
- negative
- negative
Bacterial and Viral-Induced Changes in the Reflectance Spectra of Nicotiana benthamiana Plants · 2024
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.