View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
After compound 4i treatment, average recovery rates of the maize growth index exceeded 72%.
Outcomeaverage recovery rates of growth index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–56 e0 “After being treated by compound 4i, average recovery rates of growth index exceeded 72% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–731 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Root and shoot relative growth rates and net nitrogen uptake resumed in recovery .
Outcomerelative growth rates of roots and shoots, and the net uptake rate of nitrogen e0 Qualifierduring recovery e0 Verbatim
e0 “the relative growth rates of roots and shoots, and the net uptake rate of nitrogen were resumed during recovery . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1333 t0 “Late Sown Oats ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–121 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative growth rates were negative during flooding and ranged negative to positive in recovery .
OutcomeRelative growth rate (RGR) e0 Qualifiervaried from negative to positive during recovery period e0 Verbatim
e0 “Relative growth rate (RGR) of most plant components showed negative rate during flooding, but it varied from negative to positive during recovery period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–912 t0 “Lentil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant 15N recovery rates were greater in the I540 irrigation treatments than in the I405 treatments.
TreatmentI540 treatments e0 OutcomePlant 15N recovery rates e0 ComparatorI405 treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plant 15N recovery rates were greater (i) in the I540 treatments than in the I405 treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–975 t0 “Cotton growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 Other claims from this paper (16) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for wasabi than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Outcomerates of recovery growth e0 Comparatorconventional encapsulation-dehydration e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for chrysanthemum than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Outcomerates of recovery growth e0 Comparatorconventional encapsulation-dehydration e0 Verbatim
e0 “much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The new protocol gave higher recovery growth for mint than conventional encapsulation-dehydration.
Outcomerates of recovery growth e0 Comparatorconventional encapsulation-dehydration e0 Verbatim
e0 “much higher rates of recovery growth in the three plant species tested (wasabi, chrysanthemum, and mint) than those cryopreserved by the conventional encapsulation-dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–723 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N fertilizer rates decreased apparent N recovery and N use efficiency of rice.
Treatmentincreasing rates of N fertilizer e6 Outcomeapparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “There was a significant increase in the N uptake of the rice but a decrease in the apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency of applied fertilizer N, with the application of increasing rates of N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1215 t0 “rice growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 7.98% greater than in fresh water (FW).
OutcomePlant 15N recovery rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135 t0 “Cotton growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant 15N recovery rates in brackish water (BW) were 30.01% greater than in saline water (SW).
OutcomePlant 15N recovery rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plant 15N recovery rates in BW were 7.98% and 30.01% greater than those in FW and SW, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1135 t0 “Cotton growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.