View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities .
Treatmentlow light intensities e1 Outcomedegree of inhibition e1 Comparatorhigh light intensities e1 Verbatim
e1 “The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–736 e2 “in isolated spinach chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–107 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sassafras photosynthesizes efficiently at low light intensities .
Treatmentlow light intensities e1 Outcomephotosynthesizes efficiently e1 Verbatim
e1 “Sassafras photosynthesizes efficiently under high plant water stress and at low light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–293 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sirococcus infection percentage was greater under low light intensities (900–3900 lx) than under high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx).
Treatmentlow light intensities (900–3900 lx) e1 Outcomepercentage infection e1 QualifierAt all temperature ranges e1 Comparatorrelatively high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx) e1 Verbatim
t0 “Environmental factors affecting Sirococcus shoot blight of black spruce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 e1 “At all temperature ranges, the percentage infection was greater under low light intensities (900–3900 lx) than under relatively high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1126 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High light intensities were required regardless of daylength.
Outcomehigh light intensities, independent of daylength, are required e0 Verbatim
e0 “high light intensities , independent of daylength, are required ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–240 t0 “Gladiolus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Response to increasing soil N was greater at higher light intensities .
Treatmenthigher light intensities e0 Outcomeresponse to soil increments of N e0 Verbatim
e0 “response to soil increments of N was greater at higher light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–499 t0 “Spinach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The studied light intensities did not influence solanine synthesis.
Treatmentlight intensities studied e0 Outcomesolanine synthesis e0 Directionnot influenced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “POTATO TUBERS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 e0 “The solanine synthesis was not influenced by the light intensities studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–784 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower light intensities changed the character of stomatal frequency gradients.
Treatmentlower light intensities e1 Outcomecharacter of gradients e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Iris hollandica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–57 e1 “The character of gradients was changed at lower light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–641 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At low light intensities only the 15 °C leaf-blade peak was evident.
Qualifierlow light intensities e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the 15 °C peak was the only one evident at low light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1127 t0 “Marquis wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cistus seedlings required high light intensities experimentally.
Outcomeneed of Cistus seedlings for high light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “The need of Cistus seedlings for high light intensities was established experimentally. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–975 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High posttreatment light intensity caused greater photosynthesis inhibition than low intensity.
TreatmentHigh posttreatment light intensities e0 Outcomeinhibition of photosynthesis e0 Comparatorlow light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “High posttreatment light intensities caused greater inhibition of photosynthesis than low light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–790 e1 “sugarbeet plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–274 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.