View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density .
purple nutsedge e0 weed purple nutsedge density e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Eggplant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–99 e0 “Fumigation and fomesafen did not decrease purple nutsedge density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1358 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
nutrient density unit (NDU) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
soil inoculum density e0 not a significant decrease e0 1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leafhopper abundance did not decrease with greater trichome density .
leafhopper e0 pest leafhopper abundance e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “leafhopper abundance did not decrease as trichome density in creased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1169 t0 “on potato. Natural variation in trichome density among 17 potato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–751 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield.
six plants per meter e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Association author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease of BGF along the leaf cannot be explained by a reduction in trichome density .
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–537 e7 “the decrease of BGF along this leaf can not be explained by a reduction in trichomes density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1477 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pubescence density did not consistently in crease or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff.
Pubescence density e2 no_change inferred e2 between anthesis and shuckoff e2 Verbatim
e0 “peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. cv. June Gold] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–100 e2 “Pubescence density did not consistently in crease or decrease between anthesis and shuckoff, but did show a major decrease on ripe fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–459 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
During 8 months of juice storage, the rate of anthocyanin degradation and the colour density decrease were the same in all samples.
storage of the juice for 8 months e6 rate of ACN degradation and color density decrease e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Heating crushed Concord grapes under pilot plant conditions to 88° and 99°C in activated nearly all of the polyphenoloxidase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–323 e6 “During storage of the juice for 8 months, the rate of ACN degradation and color density decrease was the same in all samples ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–544 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing only subsoil density did not decrease total root length.
Field Bean and Soybean t0 Increase in only subsoil density from medium to high e0 total root length e0 Verbatim
e0 “In crease in only subsoil density from medium to high (level 2) decrease d shoot and root dry matters (8 to 36% and 16 to 39%, respectively) but not the total root length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1065 t0 “Field Bean and Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Appressed membrane particle density did not decrease at 1°C.
density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture face e0 Verbatim
e0 “no decrease in the density of particles on the appressed exoplasmic fracture face ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–738 t0 “Attached leaves of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Jattiläismeloni) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–66 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher first-year clopyralid rates did not decrease sowthistle density in year four.
perennial sowthistle e0 Increasing the rate of clopyralid e0 perennial sowthistle density e0 no_change inferred e0 in the fourth year e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creasing the rate of clopyralid in the first year resulted in decrease s in perennial sowthistle density in the second and third years following application but not in the fourth year. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1259 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential did not decline under low photon flux density .
did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Ψl in the plant exposed to low PFD did not decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–608 t0 “Responses of Soybean Leaf Angle, Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance to Leaf and Soil Water Potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–105 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease sugarcane borer density .
Release of 1418 parasites/ha e0 Lixophaga diatraeae e2 biocontrol_agent did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Release of 1418 parasites/ha did not decrease host density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–418 e1 “sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis (F.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–211 e2 “a tachinid parasite, Lixophaga diatraeae (Townsend) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–69 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
a third year without wheat e0 additional decrease e0 no additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was not significantly affected by plant density .
TRITICALE AND GLENLEA WHEAT t0 increased plant density e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Although grain yield was not significantly affected, 1000-kernel weight, kernel number per spike, and number of fertile spikes per plant exhibited a highly significant linear decrease with in creased plant density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–659 t0 “TRITICALE AND GLENLEA WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–93 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A further in crease in crop density beyond a certain level did not decrease the size of wild oats.
further increase in crop e4 size of wild oats e4 did not decrease e4 Beyond a certain crop density dependent on soil fertility e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “COMPETITION FROM CEREAL CROPS ON THE GERMINATION ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–62 e4 “Beyond a certain crop density dependent on soil fertility, further in crease in crop did not decrease the size of wild oats ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–871 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Minimum leaf diffusion resistance values were the same for the upper and lower epidermis when stomatal density was adequate.
the upper and the lower epidermis e2 minimum R(L) values e2 provided that stomatal density was adequate e2 the lower epidermis e2 Verbatim
e1 “Stepwise in creases in fluorescent illuminance, imposed as a single variable in a controlled environment, in duced progressive stomatal opening in 8 plant species, as evidenced by a consistent decrease in leaf diffusion resistance (R(L)), ranging from 15 to 70 sec cm(-1) in darkness to about 1 sec cm(-1) at approximately 40 kilolux ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–331 e2 “The minimum R(L) values were the same for the upper and the lower epidermis, provided that stomatal density was adequate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–453 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum melongenat0
Prunus cerasus
Oryza sativa.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Solanum tuberosum
Phaseolus vulgaris
Triticum aestivum
Prunus persica
Glycine max
Diatraea saccharalis
Avena