View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage accounted for 3.36% of aboveground biomass .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “foliage (3.36%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1054 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter was 35% of fresh foliage biomass .
Outcomefresh foliage biomass e0 Qualifierfresh foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “it was 35% of the fresh foliage biomass and 60% of the fresh woody biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2675–2749 t0 “Black wattle (Acacia mearnsii ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (18) Association observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Precipitation of 100mm in creased pine foliage biomass in warm regions.
OutcomePine tree foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “precipitation (100mm) in creased Pine tree foliage biomass in warm regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–934 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Verbatim
e0 “there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass (P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1813 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
About 50% of biomass was lost over winter, mainly foliage .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “About 50% of the biomass was lost during the winter, mainly in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Verbatim
e0 “there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031 t0 “Rhamnus davurica ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass .
Outcometotal foliage biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Shortleaf Pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 e0 “thinning seemed to reduce the total foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1045 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All treatments allocated the most biomass to foliage .
Outcomemore biomass to foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “All treatments allocated more biomass to foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2034 t0 “Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1129 Other claims from this paper (18) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations were similar between the two zones.
Comparatordistribution zones e0 Verbatim
e0 “Allometric equations to predict the foliage biomass of T. in dica were similar for its distribution zones in Burkina Faso ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1226 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH regressions predicted branch and foliage biomass poorly.
Outcomebiomass of branch and foliage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the precision and reliability were poor of the regressions between the DBH and the biomass of branch and foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–948 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.