View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Total bulb sugar concentration varied by cultivar and year.
OutcomeTotal bulb sugar concentration e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Total bulb sugar concentration and pungency varied among cultivars and years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–433 t0 “Onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen form did not affect onion bulb sugar concentration .
Outcomebulb sugar concentration e6 Directionno_change inferred e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “Nitrogen form also influenced water uptake and pungency, as measured by enzymatically developed pyruvate concentration , but did not affect bulb sugar concentration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–884 t0 “Onion Plant Growth, Bulb Quality, and Water Uptake following Ammonium and Nitrate Nutrition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soluble sugar concentration of the lily tissue bulb increased compared with the control.
Organ / stagetissue bulb e4 Outcomesoluble sugar concentration e4 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “tissue bulb s of oriental lily cultivar siberia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–148 e4 “The soluble sugar concentration of the lily tissue bulb increased and its starch concentration decreased compared with those of the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–649 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Suitable sugar sources and concentration s varied among bulb flowers.
Outcomeappropriate sugar source and treatment concentration e0 Verbatim
e0 “the appropriate sugar source and treatment concentration varied with different bulb flowers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–284 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cane sugar concentration had a significant effect on multiplication and growth of Lycoris radiata bulb , best at 60 g/l.
Treatmentcane sugar concentration e0 Outcomemultiplication and growth of bulb e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Lycoris radiata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–64 e0 “cane sugar concentration had significant effect on multiplication and growth of bulb with the best of 60 g/l ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–450 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
2% sugar concentration and 15 ℃ increased lily tissue bulb weight after 60 days of culture.
Treatment2% sugar concentration and 15 ℃ e1 Outcomelily tissue bulb weight e1 Qualifierafter culture for 60 days e1 Comparator6% sugar concentration and 25 ℃ e2 Verbatim
e0 “tissue bulb s of oriental lily cultivar siberia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–148 e1 “the condition of 2% sugar concentration and 15 ℃ increased lily tissue bulb weight after culture for 60 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–451 e2 “The control was under the condition of 6% sugar concentration and 25 ℃ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–319 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Swede varieties differed significantly in bulb sugar concentration and profile.
Outcomesugar (total and profile) e0 Verbatim
e0 “there were significant differences among swede varieties for concentration s of starch and sugar (total and profile) in bulb s. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1496 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoots cultured at 8%–12% sugar had greater total bulb weight.
Treatment8%-12% sugar concentration e0 Outcometotal weight of bulb e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Masses cultured at the 8%-12% sugar concentration showed a high survival rate and the total weight of bulb was greater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1085 t0 “Narcissus tazetta L. var. chinensis ROEM. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–139 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Soaking bulb s increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-amylase enzyme concentration more than spraying.
TreatmentSoaking bulb method e3 OutcomeZn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentration e3 Comparatorspraying method e3 Verbatim
e0 “spraying and soaking lilium bulb with humic and fulvic acids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–75 e3 “Soaking bulb method increased Zn, soluble sugar and µ-Amylase Enzyme concentration than spraying method but spraying method was more effective on anthocyanins amounts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–856 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Bulb pungency varied by cultivar and year.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Total bulb sugar concentration and pungency varied among cultivars and years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–433 t0 “Onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–22 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.