Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Harvest index was higher with vermicompost intercropping than urea treatment.

A claim from Effect of Intercropping Farming and Vermicompost System on the Nutritional Quality and Yield of Rice and Pigeonpea · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was higher with vermicompost intercropping than urea treatment.

Taxon
Rice and PigeonpeaCajanus cajanOryza sativat0
Treatment
intercropping treated with vermicomposte0
Outcome
HI (Harvest Index)e0
Direction
moree0
Value
0.82e0
Qualifier
0.62e0
Comparator
conventional one treated with ureae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (18.01 kg/ha) and HI (Harvest Index) (0.82) were found more in intercropping treated with vermicompost as compared to conventional one treated with urea (14.23 kg/ha) and (0.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1396
t0

“Rice and Pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–114

Title

Effect of Intercropping Farming and Vermicompost System on the Nutritional Quality and Yield of Rice and Pigeonpea

Madhu Rani; Sonia Kapoor UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2023. doi:10.56557/upjoz/2023/v44i213691

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2ae039a9e9d39ec27f55097d1f99ab1b1797cf90ad93d77d41598b531a87ba01 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

95 papers: 77 positive, 18 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Hedgerow intercropping gave lower rice yields than a crop rotation with legume cover crops.

    Crop yield, C and N balance of three types of cropping systems on an Ultisol in Northern Lampung · 2000 · compared with a crop rotation with legume cover crops

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Forage intercrops significantly reduced rice grain yield versus monocropped rice by 10.94 to 25.87%.

    Effect of different rice-based intercropping systems on rice grain yield and residual soil fertility. · 2010 · compared with monocropped rice

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Indigo intercropping generally did not affect dry season crop yields.

    ROLE OF INDIGO IN IMPROVING THE PRODUCTIVITY OF RAINFED LOWLAND RICE-BASED CROPPING SYSTEMS · 1999

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Intercropped rice had lower yield than monoculture rice.

    Synthetic Microbial Community Isolated from Intercropping System Enhances P Uptake in Rice · 2024 · compared with rice grown in monoculture

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Intercropping caused a small reduction in rice yield.

    Productivity and light interception in upland rice - legume intercropping systems · 1994

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Maize intercropping reduced rice grain yield by 10.94% versus monocropped rice.

    EVALUATION OF DIRECT-SEEDED UPLAND RICE-BASED INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS UNDER STRIP PLANTING GEOMETRY · 2007 · compared with monocropped rice

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Palisadegrass intercropping decreased rice shoot dry matter and grain yield by 11%.

    Overcoming Competition From Intercropped Forages on Upland Rice With Optimized Nitrogen Input to Food Production in Tropical Region · 2020 · compared with monocropped rice

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Intercropping significantly reduced rice grain yield yield relative to sole cropping.

    Effect of intercropping madumbe (Colocasia esculenta) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) on yield and land productivity under different irrigation water management techniques with effluent water · 2020 · compared with sole cropping

    Opposite direction

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Intercropped pigeonpea yield was about 50% lower than sole pigeonpea yield.

    Residual Effect of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) on Yield and Nitrogen Response of Maize · 1983 · compared with sole crop

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Intercropping pigeonpea with urdbean had no effect on pigeonpea yield compared with sole pigeonpea.

    Effect of land configuration, post-monsoon irrigation and phosphorus on perfor- mance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2001 · compared with sole

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Intercropping affected pigeonpea grain yield the least (relative land equivalent ratio 0.9).

    Effects of management practices on legume productivity in smallholder farming systems in sub‐Saharan Africa · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Intercropping did not influence pigeonpea yield, yield attributes or nutrient uptake.

    Effect of organic manure and sulphur fertilization in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) + groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping system · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Intercropped pigeonpea had fewer branches per plant than sole pigeonpea.

    EVALUATION OF PIGEONPEA (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) GENOTYPES FOR INTERCROPPING WITH TALL SORGHUM (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) IN SOUTHERN GUINEA SAVANNA OF NIGERIA · 2009 · compared with sole cropped pigeonpea

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    pigeonpea yield declined under intercropping relative to monocropping in the LD-MD trial.

    Maize and Pigeonpea Intercropping Systems in Mpumalanga, South Africa · 2001 · compared with monocropping systems

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Intercropped pigeonpea numerically reduced seed yield and yield attributes compared with sole cropping.

    Studies on nutrient management in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp] based intercropping system of urd bean, sesame and mung bean · 2018 · compared with sole cropping

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Maize intercropping significantly reduced pigeonpea primary branches, leaves and main-crop grain yield.

    Grain yield assessment of six pigeonpea genotypes in production systems and their ratoonability in a humid tropical agro-ecology of Nigeria · 2013

    Opposite direction

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Grain yields were not increased with N fertilizer.

    Comparison of N2 Fixation and Yields in Cajanus cajan between Hydrogenase-Positive and Hydrogenase-Negative Rhizobia by In Situ Acetylene Reduction Assays and Direct 15N Partitioning · 1983

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Vermicompost and phosphocompost gave identical growth and yield outcomes.

    Response of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) varieties to organic manures and their influence on fertility and enzyme activity of soil · 2006 · compared with phosphoeompost

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments had no effect on green pod yield.

    Influence of Fertility Level on the Protein Content and Agronomic Characters of Pigeonpeas in an Oxisol · 1971

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Palm bunch ash and PK fertiliser application had no significant effect on pigeonpea grain yield.

    Productivity of pigeonpea genotypes as influenced by palm bunch ash and NPK fertiliser application and their residual effects on maize yield · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Growth regulators and foliar fertilizer had no effect on pod set or final pod number.

    Influence of Nutrition and Bioregulators on Flower Retention, Pod Set and Yield on Pigeon Peas (Cajanus Cajan (L.) Huth) · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Organic fertilizer had no effect on Cajanus cajan productivity compared with the control

    Effect of Cow Dung as Organic Manure on the Productivity of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp (Pigeon pea) · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Increasing fertilizer did not significantly increase equivalent yield in pigeonpea plus urdbean.

    Production Potential and Economic Feasibility of Planting Pattern and Nutrient Management in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Based Intercropping System under Rainfed Condition · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fertilizer improved pigeon pea yields by 32–449% compared with unfertilized intercrops.

    Sustainable Intensification with Cereal-Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa · 2019 · compared with unfertilized intercrops

    Same direction

157 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.