Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T4 significantly increased maize nitrogen content relative to the control during both seasons.

A claim from Influence of Nano Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Yield and Nutrient Content of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 significantly increased maize nitrogen content relative to the control during both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
T4- 75% RDF + Nano N and P through foliar application (2000 ppm)e1
Outcome
nitrogene1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments were tested against the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1732
e1

“Signficantly higher grain yield, straw yield, nitrogen and phosphorus content in maize was recorded was achieved under application of T4- 75% RDF + Nano N and P through foliar application (2000 ppm) during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1733–1952

Title

Influence of Nano Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Yield and Nutrient Content of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Aishwarya Maheta; Divya Gaur; A. S. Bhanvadia; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2023. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i32770

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-c3fb2ed723dce534b269838220b8285d41f670eedcf7a860498f7d4a9b5643bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 67 positive, 10 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    PNS had no significant effect on seed phosphorus, calcium and sodium concentrations in maize.

    Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to potassium nano-silica application under drought stress · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    EGC and CuNPs at 1,000 mg L −1 reduced manganese and zinc absorption and concentrations.

    Essential oil-grafted copper nanoparticles as a potential next-generation fungicide for holistic disease management in maize · 2023

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Nanoparticles did not affect soil pH or nutrients relative to controls.

    Insecticidal efficacy of nanoparticles against Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) larvae and their impact in the soil · 2023 · compared with control treatments

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Low rate ZnO nanoparticles gave no or negligible grain Zn increase over water.

    Biofortification of different maize cultivars with zinc, iron and selenium by foliar fertilizer applications · 2023 · compared with deionized water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Arsenic oxide nanoparticles induced arsenic uptake and accumulation in maize.

    Soil enrichment with actinomycete mitigates the toxicity of arsenic oxide nanoparticles on wheat and maize growth and metabolism · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Excessive nZVI particles possibly inhibit water and nutrient uptake in maize.

    Iron Nanostructure Primes Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Symbiosis Tightly Connecting Maize Leaf Photosynthesis via a Nanofilm Effect · 2024

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Malate-driven transport was often more inhibited than succinate or ATP-driven uptake at 5 nanograms per milliliter.

    Helminthosporium maydis T Toxin Decreased Calcium Transport into Mitochondria of Susceptible Corn · 1984 · compared with succinate or ATP-driven Ca(2+) uptake

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    50% NPK, NP or N alone caused quite low P uptake by maize stover.

    Phosphorus removal and available P balance in a Typic Ustochrept under intensive cropping and long-term fertilizer use · 1998

    Opposite direction

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Spray timing did not affect plant-part nitrogen content relative to controls.

    Uptake, Distribution, and Remobilization of 15N‐labeled Urea Applied to Maize Canopies1 · 1985 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Humus did not significantly affect P and Ca uptake.

    Effects of soil applied humic substances to dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of maize under calcareous soil conditions · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Low boron use and zinc solution spray did not affect grain boron uptake.

    Application of Different Levels of Zinc and Boron on Concentration and Uptake of Zinc and Boron in the Corn Grain · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Osmotic stress before or during the absorption period reduced Rb absorption to 20% or less of controls.

    INFLUENCE OF MANNITOL ON ABSORPTION AND RETENTION OF RUBIDIUM BY EXCISED CORN ROOTS · 1973 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphite application number generally did not change phosphorus concentrations in corn grain, leaf and stem.

    Does phosphite, a reduced form of phosphate contribute to phosphorus nutrition in corn (Zea mays L.)? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Four foliar CaCl 2 applications increased shoot cadmium concentration relative to two.

    Effects of Ca on growth and some physiological characteristics of maize under Cd stress · 2001 · compared with foliar application CaCl 2 two times

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Leaf nutrient content did not differ before and after chelate application in either hybrid.

    Agronomic characteristics and management of diseases in maize with chelate-based products containing calcium, copper, manganese, and zinc · 2020 · compared with before

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower total digestible nutrient in fodder maize.

    Impact of integrated nitrogen management on the nutritional quality of fodder maize · 2025

    Opposite direction

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this claim · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Phosphorus application did not increase silicon and phosphorus contents in maize shoots and roots.

    Effect of Silicon on Low pH Soil Phosphorus Sorption and on Uptake and Growth of Maize · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Phosphorus deprivation decreased chlorophyll and phosphorus fractions throughout the maize shoot.

    Phosphate Deficiency in Maize. V. Mobilization of Nitrogen and Phosphorus within Shoots of Young Plants and its Relationship to Senescence · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    The HP treatment did not affect the absorption of Zn by maize.

    THE ROLE OF VA MYCORRHIZAE IN THE ABSORPTION OF P AND Zn BY MAIZE IN FIELD AND GROWTH CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS · 1989

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    P uptake Vmax rose under P deficiency, especially in maize.

    Mobilization of phosphorus contributes to positive rotational effects of leguminous cover crops on maize grown on soils from northern Nigeria · 2002

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  5. negative
    Phosphate reduced Fe uptake more in ys 1 than in Pa 54.

    Iron Uptake Dependent upon Genotype of Corn · 1969

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Only 32 μM phosphorus significantly lowered maize shoot zinc relative to other treatments.

    PHOSPHORUS AND ZINC INTERACTIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER NUTRIENTS IN MAIZE GROWN IN CHELATOR-BUFFERED NUTRIENT SOLUTION · 2011 · compared with other treatments

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    High phosphorus increased zinc 65 in the ethanol soluble fraction of corn root cell walls.

    Changes in the Zinc‐65 Distribution in Corn Root Tissue with a Phosphorus Variable1 · 1977

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    High P supply decreased Zn concentration in corn shoots.

    Yield and Uptake Response of Corn to Zinc, as Influenced by Phosphorus Fertilization1 · 1976

    Opposite direction

235 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.