Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment 9 yielded higher grain yield (5.697 t/ha) in wheat.

A claim from Effect of Zinc and Bio-fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment 9 yielded higher grain yield (5.697 t/ha) in wheat.

Treatment
Zinc (10 kg/ha) + Azotobacter (10 g/kg seeds) + Azospirillum (10 g/kg seeds)e0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.697 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment-9 with application of [Zinc (10 kg/ha) + Azotobacter (10 g/kg seeds) + Azospirillum (10 g/kg seeds)] was recorded significantly higher plant height (96.10 cm), higher plant dry weight (20.31 g/plant), higher number of spikes/m2 (371.84), higher number of grains/spike (55.17), higher grain yield (5.697 t/ha), higher straw yield (12.59 t/ha) and highest harvest index (31.14 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1177
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–86

Title

Effect of Zinc and Bio-fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Gudela Devan Sai; Victor Debbarma International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231556

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c6ca36bbc260b3fff4fc2048b2eb536b1fcfcf73c6fcd508329dd20584cb2027 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

88 papers: 87 positive, 1 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    That FYM, Azotobacter and cowpea treatment reduced wheat yield.

    EFFECT OF FERTILIZER AND MANURE APPLICATION ON SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION, SOIL FERTILITY AND YIELD SUSTAINABILITY UNDER MAIZE-WHEAT CROPPING SYSTEM IN SUBTROPICAL MOLLISOLS · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Azotobacter with nano Zn-Fe oxide increased grain yield by 88% compared with control under severe water limitation.

    Effects of Biofertilizers and Nano Zinc-Iron Oxide on Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat under Water Deficit Conditions · 2020 · compared with control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Humic plus 192 kg N with amino acids and Azotobacter+yeast gave the highest flag leaf area, total dry weight and tiller number.

    Nitrogen use Rationalization and Boosting Wheat Productivity by Applying Packages of Humic, Amino Acids, and Microorganisms · 2020

    Same direction

  4. positive
    T10 produced the highest wheat grain yield among the treatments.

    Integrated Nutrient Management for Improving, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, Soil Biodiversity and Productivity of Wheat in Irrigated Rice Wheat Cropping System in Indo-Gangatic Plains of India · 2017 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by 16.5%–19.42% over non-inoculated treatments.

    Comparative study of Azotobacter with or without other fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat in Western hills of Nepal · 2018 · compared with non inoculated treatments

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Residual integrated nitrogen, manure, and Azotobacter increased wheat yield attributes and grain yield.

    Productivity and Sustainability of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)–Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cropping System as Influenced by Prilled Urea, Farmyard Manure and Azotobacter · 2004

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The 150 kg Nlha plus FYM plus Azotobacter treatment increased wheat growth, nutrient uptake, available N and grain and straw yields significantly.

    Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under limited and adequate irrigation supplies · 2001

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Single or combined Azotobacter and mycorrhiza inoculation significantly increased spikes per square meter of wheat compared with no inoculation.

    Response of Winter Wheat to Co-Inoculation with Azotobacter and Arbescular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) under Different Sources of Nitrogen Fertilizer · 2010 · compared with without inoculation treatment

    Same direction

79 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Five kilograms zinc per hectare increased wheat grain yield by 31.6% over control, the highest increase.

    Effect of Zinc Application on Rice Yield under Wheat Rice System · 2007 · compared with control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Application of 150 kg N and 15 kg Zn ha−1 gave the highest wheat yield components.

    INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF ZINC AND NITROGEN APPLICATION ON WHEAT GROWTH AND GRAIN YIELD · 2013

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Foliar zinc increased the number of fertile wheat tillers.

    Response of wheat to foliar application of zinc · 2012

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
    Azospirillum inoculation significantly increased grain and foliage yield.

    Effect of Azospirillum inoculation on yield of field-grown wheat · 1983

    Same direction

  2. positive
    Pot inoculation with Azospirillum increased wheat grain yield by 9.3% over uninoculated control.

    Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizer Azospirillum, Bacillus and Enterobacter strains by 16SrRNA sequence analysis and their effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2013 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Single Azospirillum inoculation increased grain yield by 29%.

    Influence of the co-inoculation Azospirillum brasilense and Rhizobium meliloti plus 2,4-D on grain yield and N, P, K content of Triticum aestivum (cv. Baccros and Mahdavi). · 2009 · compared with control plants

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Azospirillum inoculation significantly increased yield among wheat plants that developed normally.

    THE RESPONSE OF A HORMONAL MUTANT OF COMMON WHEAT TO BACTERIA OF THE GENUS AZOSPIRILLUM · 2013

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Azospirillum increased wheat grain yield by 256% relative to control.

    The efficiency of application of bacterial and humic preparations to enhance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant productivity in the arid regions of Egypt · 2020 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    NPK with dual inoculation produced the highest dry matter and nitrogen and phosphorus contents.

    Response of wheat to dual inoculation with VA‐mycorrhiza andazospirillum, fertilized with NPK and irrigated with sewage effluent · 1991

    Same direction

  7. positive
    grain yield increased to 4016 kg ha−1 with Azospirillum Er-20 and Pseudomonas K-1 inoculation compared with control.

    Inoculation of nitrogen fixing bacteria in conjugation with integrated nitrogen sources induced changes in phenology, growth, nitrogen assimilation and productivity of wheat crop · 2021 · compared with control

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Combining 50 kg N/ha with Azospirillum and FYM gave higher plant height and yield attributes in wheat than 150 kg N/ha.

    Integrated nitrogen management in wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2007 · compared with 150 kg N/ha

    Same direction

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.