Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biostimulant treatment increased test weight (46.97 g) in wheat.

A claim from Influence of bio-stimulants on seed dressing and foliar spray on the yield characteristics and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant treatment increased test weight (46.97 g) in wheat.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RDF combined with foliar application of Hairamin and seed treatment with Azotobactere2
Outcome
test weighte4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
46.97 ge4
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Haryana, Indiae3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–138
e1

“The treatments range from control to combinations of Azotobacter, humic acid, seaweed extract, organic carbon, and Hairamin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075
e2

“particularlyRDF combined with foliar application of Hairamin and seed treatment with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1277
e3

“Experimental Farm of Department of Agriculture, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Haryana, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–740
e4

“test weight (46.97 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1607

Title

Influence of bio-stimulants on seed dressing and foliar spray on the yield characteristics and grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

JAG MOHAN; VIKAS TOMAR; ISHWAR SINGH Crop Research 2025. doi:10.31830/2454-1761.2025.cr-1025

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-e21436fa5552e43e8d12f72d87d1efb3ca0cd311db0c9f023f1b76290197a791 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Same direction

  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.