Claim · model-written summary
Tillage and 2,4-D supplemented with picloram or imazapyr were almost as profitable as tillage and 2,4-D.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Tillage and 2,4-D supplemented with picloram or imazapyre4
- Interactor
- field bindweede0weed
- Outcome
- profitablee4
- Direction
- almost ase4
- Comparator
- tillage and 2,4-De4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This research compared seven field bindweed control treatments to a check in a 3-yr winter wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation”
e4“Tillage and 2,4-D supplemented with picloram or imazapyr were almost as profitable as tillage and 2,4-D”
Title
Economic evaluation of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control
Allen F. Wiese; Brent W. Bean; Clay D. Salisbury; et al. Weed Science 1997. doi:10.1017/s0043174500092857
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect All field bindweed control treatments controlled field bindweed in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation.
- Intervention effect Wheat and sorghum yields after field bindweed control were about twice those of the check.
- Intervention effect Tillage and 2,4-D gave owner-operator profit of $123 per hectare, higher than the check.
- Intervention effect No-tillage treatments lost money in field bindweed control because of high herbicide cost and low yields.
- Observation Owner profit with tillage and 2,4-D under a 33:67 owner-tenant rental agreement was $105 per hectare.
- Observation Tenant profit with tillage and 2,4-D under a 33:67 owner-tenant rental agreement was $21 per hectare.
- Observation Without field bindweed control, the tenant lost $33 per hectare.
- Observation Without field bindweed control, the owner made $51 per hectare.