Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of soil salinity, phosphorus and biofertilizers on physical properties of soil, yield attributes and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Wilczek]

Sushila Aechra; B K Yadav; Bhuli Devi Ghosalya; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted in 2015 at S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner during kharif season using cowpea as a test crop to investigate the effect of phosphorus management in cowpea grown on saline soils. Three levels each of saline soils (EC 1, 4.0 and 6.0 dS/m), phosphorus sources (SSP, DAP and PROM), and biofertilizers (control, PSB and PSB + VAM), were tested in completely randomized design with three replications. The results indicated that application of soil salinity having EC 1dS/m recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments. Result further indicate that application of phosphorus source PROM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments. However dual inoculation with PSB + VAM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments but in case of nodule index remained at par with PSB. However, application the test weight and harvest index unchanged under different treatment levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EC 1 dS/m salinity produced the maximum, significantly higher nodulation measures than other treatments.

Treatment
soil salinity having EC 1dS/me0
Outcome
total and effective nodules, nodule indexe0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of soil salinity having EC 1dS/m recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EC 1 dS/m salinity produced significantly higher pods, seeds, grain and straw yield, and root mass.

Treatment
soil salinity having EC 1dS/me0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root masse0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of soil salinity having EC 1dS/m recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PROM gave maximum significantly higher nodulation measures than other treatments.

Treatment
phosphorus source PROMe0
Outcome
total and effective nodules, nodule indexe0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus source PROM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PROM gave maximum significantly higher yield components and root mass.

Treatment
phosphorus source PROMe0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root masse0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phosphorus source PROM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual PSB and VAM inoculation gave maximum significantly higher nodulation except that nodule index was comparable to PSB.

Treatment
dual inoculation with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSB + VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
total and effective nodules, nodule indexe0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation with PSB + VAM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual PSB and VAM inoculation gave maximum significantly higher yield components and root mass.

Treatment
dual inoculation with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSB + VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root masse0
Direction
maximum and significantly highere0
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation with PSB + VAM recorded the maximum and significantly higher total and effective nodules, nodule index, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield, straw yield and root mass of cowpea over rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule index under dual inoculation was at par with PSB alone.

Outcome
nodule indexe0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
PSBe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of nodule index remained at par with PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight and harvest index were unchanged across treatment levels.

Treatment
different treatment levelse0
Outcome
test weight and harvest indexe0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“test weight and harvest index unchanged under different treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

23 papers: 2 positive, 21 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

salinity · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.