Paper · 2022 · Sustainability

Effect of Crop Establishment Methods and Microbial Inoculations on Augmenting the Energy Efficiency and Nutritional Status of Rice and Wheat in Cropping System Mode

Amit Anil Shahane; Yashbir Singh Shivay; Radha Prasanna; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years with the aim to quantify the role of different nutrient management variables such as microbial inoculation, zinc (Zn) fertilization and optimal and sub-optimal fertilization of nitrogen and phosphorus on the energetic and nutritional status of the rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS). The said nutrient management variables were applied over six different crop establishment methods (CEMs) in RWCS viz. puddled transplanted rice (PTR), system of rice intensification (SRI) and aerobic rice system (ARS) in rice and conventional drill-sown wheat (CDW), system of wheat intensification (SWI) and zero-tillage wheat (ZTW) in wheat. Two microbial consortia viz. Anabaena sp. (CR1) + Providencia sp. (PR3) consortia (MC1) and Anabaena-Pseudomonas biofilmed formulations (MC2) were used in this study, while recommended dose of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) (RDN) (120 kg N ha−1 and 25.8 kg P ha−1), 75% RDN and Zn fertilization (soil applied 5 kg Zn ha−1 through zinc sulphate heptahydrate) were the other variables. The contribution of microbial consortia, Zn fertilization and RDN (over 75% RDN) to net energy production of RWCS was 12.9–16.1 × 103 MJ ha−1, 10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1 and 11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1. Among the CEMs, the highest gross and net energy production was recorded in ARS–ZTW with lowest energy required for production of one tonne of system yield (2366–2523 MJ). The system protein yield varies from 494.1 to 957.7 kg ha−1 with highest protein yield in 75% RDN + MC2 + Zn applied ARS–ZTW. Among micronutrients, the uptake of Zn and iron (Fe) is sensitive to all studied variables, while manganese (Mn) and cupper (Cu) uptake was found significantly affected by CEMs alone. The combination of 75% RDN + MC2 + Zn in ARS–ZTW was found superior in all respects with 288.3 and 286.9 MJ ha−1 net energy production and 2320 and 2473 MJ energy required for production of one tonne system yield in the first and second year of study, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial consortia increased net energy production.

Treatment
microbial consortiae0
Outcome
net energy production of RWCSe0
Value
12.9–16.1 × 103 MJ ha−1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of microbial consortia, Zn fertilization and RDN (over 75% RDN) to net energy production of RWCS was 12.9–16.1 × 103 MJ ha−1, 10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1 and 11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization contributed 10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1 of net energy.

Treatment
Zn fertilizatione0
Outcome
net energy production of RWCSe0
Value
10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of microbial consortia, Zn fertilization and RDN (over 75% RDN) to net energy production of RWCS was 12.9–16.1 × 103 MJ ha−1, 10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1 and 11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDN over 75% RDN contributed 11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1 of net energy.

Treatment
RDNe0
Outcome
net energy production of RWCSe0
Value
11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1e0
Comparator
75% RDNe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contribution of microbial consortia, Zn fertilization and RDN (over 75% RDN) to net energy production of RWCS was 12.9–16.1 × 103 MJ ha−1, 10.1–11.0 × 103 MJ ha−1 and 11.7–15.3 × 103 MJ ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1266 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARS–ZTW had the highest gross and net energy production.

Treatment
ARS–ZTWe0
Outcome
gross and net energy productione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest gross and net energy production was recorded in ARS–ZTW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ARS–ZTW required the least energy per tonne of system yield.

Treatment
ARS–ZTWe0
Outcome
energy required for production of one tonne of system yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2366–2523 MJe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ARS–ZTW with lowest energy required for production of one tonne of system yield (2366–2523 MJ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

System protein yield ranged from 494.1 to 957.7 kg ha−1.

Outcome
system protein yielde0
Value
494.1 to 957.7 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The system protein yield varies from 494.1 to 957.7 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest protein yield occurred with 75% RDN + MC2 + Zn in ARS–ZTW.

Treatment
75% RDN + MC2 + Zn applied ARS–ZTWe0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest protein yield in 75% RDN + MC2 + Zn applied ARS–ZTW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and iron uptake were sensitive to all studied variables.

Treatment
all studied variablese0
Outcome
uptake of Zn and iron (Fe)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the uptake of Zn and iron (Fe) is sensitive to all studied variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese and copper uptake were significantly affected by crop establishment methods alone.

Treatment
CEMse0
Outcome
manganese (Mn) and cupper (Cu) uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“manganese (Mn) and cupper (Cu) uptake was found significantly affected by CEMs alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–140 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.