View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
biomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Larix accumulated more foliage biomass regardless of conditions.
regardless of conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “regardless of conditions, Larix accumulated more foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass .
total foliage biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Shortleaf Pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 e0 “thinning seemed to reduce the total foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1045 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vestigated factors had a higher impact on tuber biomass than on foliage biomass in radishes.
investigated factors e5 biomass of tuber e5 biomass of foliage e5 Verbatim
e1 “growth of radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–195 e5 “in vestigated factors had higher impact on biomass of tuber than biomass of foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1125 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer prolonged the in crease in foliage biomass .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was evidence of a prolonged in crease in foliage biomass due to N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–694 t0 “Corsican pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–108 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass was reduced in dry conditions.
Verbatim
e0 “Pine had reduced foliage biomass in dry conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–687 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass in creased in moist conditions.
moist conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “an in crease in foliage biomass was observed in moist conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–761 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations were similar between the two zones.
distribution zones e0 Verbatim
e0 “Allometric equations to predict the foliage biomass of T. in dica were similar for its distribution zones in Burkina Faso ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1226 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH regressions predicted branch and foliage biomass poorly.
biomass of branch and foliage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the precision and reliability were poor of the regressions between the DBH and the biomass of branch and foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–948 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The study provides equations to convert foliage biomass to surface area for most encountered species.
forest communities t0 converting from foliage biomass to surface area e0 most species encountered e0 foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Equations for converting from foliage biomass to surface area are in cluded for most species encountered ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–449 t0 “forest communities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Approximate three-quarter foliage biomass scaling suggests metabolic scaling exponents may be loosely tied to foliage fractal dimension.
metabolic scaling exponents e0 ¾ scaling of foliage biomass e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Because ¾ scaling of foliage biomass is still approximately valid, this implies that metabolic scaling exponents may not be as tightly linked to the fractal dimension of foliage as previously assumed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1608 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced foliage photosynthetic productivity largely determined the ozone impact on biomass .
negative impact of O(3) on biomass e0 lower photosynthetic productivity of the foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “the negative impact of O(3) on biomass in the clones was determined largely by lower photosynthetic productivity of the foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2163–2290 t0 “aspen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 Other claims from this paper (19) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
In creasing foliage biomass allocation was in terpreted as beneficial to developing and consolidating habitat.
develop new habitat and consolidate present habitat e0 Increasing in allocation proportion of foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “In creasing in allocation proportion of foliage biomass was beneficial to develop new habitat and consolidate present habitat for O.lubricum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1228 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
A general model was judged adequate for foliage biomass prediction across varied ecological conditions.
a variety of ecological conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “a general model is adequate for the prediction of foliage biomass of T. in dica at a larger scale in cluding a variety of ecological conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1380 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend IAA to enhance foliage biomass and yield.
enhance the foliage biomass production and yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “It was determined that IAA and GA3 can be used to enhance the foliage biomass production and yield but GA3 is superior over IAA in fenugreek. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1304 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend BIARIS at 25cm spacing for maximum foliage biomass .
25cm plant spacing e0 Verbatim
e0 “for gave the maximum biomass for foliage purpose we can planting BIARIS cultivar in 25cm plant spacing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1516 t0 “maize ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 58–64 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Rhamnus davurica
Larix
Pinus echinata
Raphanus sativus
Pinus nigra subsp. laricio
Pinus_%E0%A4%87%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%80_Tree.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Tamarindus indica
Trigonella foenum-graecum
Zea mays