View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
80% vermicompost significantly boosted tomato height , width and stem diameter growth .
80% vermicompost treatment e0 plant height,width and stem diameter growth e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “80% vermicompost treatment significantly boost tomato plant height ,width and stem diameter growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–487 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Nature soil improved plant height , stem diameter and leaf growth compared with fresh defoliation.
plant height,stem diameter and leaves growth e0 fresh defoliation e0 Verbatim
e0 “Nature soil had better effect on plant height ,stem diameter and leaves growth than the fresh defoliation. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–669 e1 “tomato seedling growth were studied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–227 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Either treatment reduced plant height , height -to-stem- diameter ratio, and stem diameter .
Either treatment e0 plant height, height-to-stem-diameter ratio, stem diameter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Either treatment reduced the following growth parameters: plant height , height -to-stem- diameter ratio, stem diameter , fresh weight, and dry weight. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–320 t0 “TOMATO TRANSPLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 Other claims from this paper (6)
not stated 664 Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Across provenances, height and diameter growth were almost the same.
growth of height and diameter e0 almost the same e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the growth of height and diameter were almost the same ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–445 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced height and basal- diameter growth .
height growth (GH) and base diameter growth (GD) e0 Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “height growth (GH) and base diameter growth (GD) declined. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–330 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
PCA identified rainfall, height growth and diameter growth as principal characters.
rainfall, height growth, and diameter growth e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “PCA illustrated rainfall, height growth , and diameter growth as the main characters in this study ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–774 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low temperature inhibited plant height and stem diameter growth .
low temperature stress e0 growth of plant height and stem diameter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “low temperature stress inhibited the growth of plant height and stem diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–779 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize varieties had significant effects on growth variables (plant height , stem diameter and number of leaves).
maize varieties e0 growth variables e0 plant height, stem diameter, and number of leaves e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed significant effects of nitrogen rates and maize varieties on growth variables (plant height , stem diameter , and number of leaves) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–649 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen rates had significant effects on maize growth variables (plant height , stem diameter and number of leaves).
nitrogen rates e0 growth variables e0 plant height, stem diameter, and number of leaves e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed significant effects of nitrogen rates and maize varieties on growth variables (plant height , stem diameter , and number of leaves) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–649 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
All six foliar growth stimulants significantly improved onion height , leaf number, bulb diameter and neck diameter versus control.
foliar spray of all growth stimulants e0 onion plant height, number of leaves, bulb diameter, neck diameter e0 Verbatim
e0 “foliar spray of all growth stimulants exhausted a significant improvement of onion plant height , number of leaves, bulb diameter , neck diameter , total yield, TSS% after one month of storage, activity of antioxidant enzymes, ascorbic acid and total phenolic in both seasons, as compared with control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–1064 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Microsprinkler fertigation treatments did not significantly influence onion crop growth in leaf production, plant height and diameter .
microsprinkler fertigation e1 not significantly influenced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “crop growth in terms of leaf production, plant height , radial and equatorial diameter was not significantly influenced by the treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–418 e1 “onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting on 16 July (D2) gave the maximum plant height and bulb diameter .
planting date 16 July(D2) e1 plant height, bulb diameter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “growth and yield of kharif onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–239 e1 “The planting date 16 July(D2)resulted in maximum plant height , bulb diameter , bulb weight and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–872 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The PGR treatment had a significant main effect on total plant height , plant diameter and inflorescence diameter of sunflower.
Total plant height, plant diameter, inflorescence diameter e3 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Potted Sunflower Growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–23 e3 “Total plant height , plant diameter , inflorescence diameter , and days until flowering were significant for the PGR treatment main effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–812 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mulching enhanced sunflower height , leaf area and stem diameter .
mulching treatment e1 plant height, leaf area, stem diameter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “while enhancing: plant height , leaf area, stem diameter and chlorophyll index ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1136 e1 “the mulching treatment significantly reduced weed density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–898 t0 “sunflower growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Flame was superior in plant height at most growth stages in spring 2001 and in stem diameter after 30 days from planting.
after 30 days from planting e0 Verbatim
t0 “SUNFLOWER PLANT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 e0 “Flame was superior in plant height at most growth stages during spring season of 2001 , and in stem diameter after 30 days from planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1509 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf number, stem diameter and height were similar at four weeks.
Average number of leaves per plant, stem diameter and plant height e0 4 weeks growth e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Average number of leaves per plant, stem diameter and plant height were all similar, with 4 weeks growth . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–608 t0 “Okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–24 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
M1 gave the best height , diameter and leaf number.
height, diameter, number of leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “M1 give the best reading of growth performance in height , diameter , number of leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1404 t0 “fruit production of okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
D1 gave the highest height , diameter and branch number.
height, diameter, number of branch e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Seedling in D1 give the highest reading in all the growth performance of plants in their height , diameter , number of branch ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1170 t0 “fruit production of okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Early planting influenced plant height , leaf number and bulb diameter of garlic.
Early planting e1 plant height, leaf number, bulb diameter e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Garlic ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78 e1 “Early planting influenced the plant height , leaf number, bulb diameter and total dry matter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–385 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus at 250 kg/ha significantly increased plant height and plant diameter of garlic.
Phosphorus at the rate of 250 kg/ha e2 height, diameter of plant e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Growth and Yield of Garlic ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–89 e2 “Phosphorus at the rate of 250 kg/ha increased significantly the height , diameter of plant size of bulb and yield of bulb ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–537 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Regulator and chemical sprays significantly affected garlic plant height , leaf number, leaf length and breadth, and collar diameter .
Sprays of growth regulators and chemicals e0 plant height, number of leaves per plant, leaf length and breadth and collar diameter e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Sprays of growth regulators and chemicals significantly affected the plant height , number of leaves per plant, leaf length and breadth and collar diameter . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–668 e1 “garlic cv. Vannur Local ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–511 t0 “Garlic (Allium sativum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 50 x 60 cm gave maximum height , leaf number and stem diameter .
height, number of leaves, stem diameter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “spacing 50 x 60 cm showed significantly maximum growth for height , number of leaves, stem diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–754 t0 “CAULIFLOWER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 50 x 60 cm gave significantly maximum growth in height , number of leaves and stem diameter .
spacing 50 x 60 cm e2 growth for height, number of leaves, stem diameter e2 experimental farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, DAV University, Jalandhar e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–143 e2 “while spacing 50 x 60 cm showed significantly maximum growth for height , number of leaves, stem diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–754 e7 “experimental farm, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, DAV University, Jalandhar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–245 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wider spacing gave the best leaf number, height , stem diameter , curd diameter and yield.
number of leaves per plant, plant height, stem diameter, curd diameter and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the wider spacing gave best results for number of leaves per plant, plant height , stem diameter , curd diameter and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1067 t0 “CAULIFLOWER ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–90 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying 50 mg/L S3307 delayed growth of plant height and stem diameter in cucumber.
50 mg·L-1 S3307 e1 growth of plant height and stem diameter e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “50 mg·L-1 S3307 could improve coloring of cucumber peel efficiently ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–479 e2 “delay growth of plant height and stem diameter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–526 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H20 ridge height promoted root growth with root diameter between 0.5 and 1.0 mm.
20 cm ridge height(H20) e1 the diameter was between 0.5~1.0 mm e1 level ground cultivation(H0) e2 Verbatim
e1 “20 cm ridge height (H20)promoted root growth that the diameter was between 0.5~1.0 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–744 e2 “the level ground cultivation(H0)promoted root growth that the diameter was greater than 1.0 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–945 t0 “Effects of Ridge Height on Root Growth and Yield of Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A 2.0% stem addition suppressed cucumber growth and decreased height , shoot diameter and biomass.
addition rate of 2.0% e0 plant height,shoot diameter,shoot fresh weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At addition rate of 2.0%, growth of cucumber plant was suppressed,resulting in marked decreases in plant height ,shoot diameter ,shoot fresh weight,total fresh and dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1336 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sugarcane growth height and stem diameter differed significantly between row spacings.
growth height and stem diameter e0 different row spacing e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “there were significant differences in growth height and stem diameter of sugarcane between different row spacing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–324 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato intercropping markedly affected sugarcane growth height and stem diameter .
intercropping with potato e0 growth height and stem diameter e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “intercropping with potato had a marked effect on growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–439 t0 “Sugarcane Intercropping with Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–46 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Different manure applications had no significant effect on sugarcane growth height and stem diameter .
different manure applications e0 growth height and stem diameter e1 no significant effect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “different manure applications had no significant effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–499 e1 “growth height and stem diameter in the stage of sugarcane growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–439 t0 “Sugarcane Intercropping ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–34 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Solanum lycopersicumt0
Zea mays
Allium cepa
Helianthus annuus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Allium sativum
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Cucumis sativus
Solanum tuberosum