Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Essential nutrient levels in wheat increased with the treatments, with NZnO having the strongest effect followed by NSiO2.

A claim from Synergistic Approaches for Wheat Productivity in Saline-Sodic Soils: Nano-Gypsum, Bacillus Inoculation and Nanomaterial Foliar Treatments · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential nutrient levels in wheat increased with the treatments, with NZnO having the strongest effect followed by NSiO2.

Treatment
applying NG, PGPB, and the foliar application of nanoparticlese0
Outcome
levels of essential nutrientse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
foliar application of NZnO exhibiting the most significant effect, followed by NSiO2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of essential nutrients in the wheat increased as a result of applying NG, PGPB, and the foliar application of nanoparticles, with foliar application of NZnO exhibiting the most significant effect, followed by NSiO2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–878

Title

Synergistic Approaches for Wheat Productivity in Saline-Sodic Soils: Nano-Gypsum, Bacillus Inoculation and Nanomaterial Foliar Treatments

Mohamed A. Saleh; Shawky M. Metwally; Muhammad Ayman; et al. Biochar and Compost Technology 2024. doi:10.21608/bct.2024.399466

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-1a6116ae740013f67dec384066dd57a3fbb9af3fd4e36a4113b640797d2d9507 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    TiO2 nanoparticles did not significantly increase titanium uptake in either plant species, despite average concentrations doubling.

    Vertical transport and plant uptake of nanoparticles in a soil mesocosm experiment · 2016

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Arsenic oxide nanoparticles induced arsenic uptake and accumulation in wheat.

    Soil enrichment with actinomycete mitigates the toxicity of arsenic oxide nanoparticles on wheat and maize growth and metabolism · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Fe3O4 nanoparticles (1 and 4 mg/l) significantly reduced light absorption at 645 and 663 nm in wheat.

    Impact of Different Nanoparticles on Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plants, Course, and Intensity of Photosynthesis · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nano ZnO application caused non-significant changes in soil available N, P, K, S and Zn content.

    Effect of Nano ZnO on Growth and Yield of Wheat under Salt Affected Soils · 2025

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Without water deficit stress, 100 mg/L ZnO NPs gave the lowest Cd in wheat.

    Foliar exposure of zinc oxide nanoparticles improved the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and decreased cadmium concentration in grains under simultaneous Cd and water deficient stress · 2020

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Nano manganese produced 22% grain manganese translocation efficiency, above salt, bulk, and control treatments.

    Effects of Manganese Nanoparticle Exposure on Nutrient Acquisition in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2018 · compared with salt-Mn

    Same direction

  7. positive
    ZnO nanoparticles increased grain Zn concentration by an average 10 mg/kg.

    Using Synchrotron-Based Approaches To Examine the Foliar Application of ZnSO4 and ZnO Nanoparticles for Field-Grown Winter Wheat · 2017

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Four ZnO nanoparticle applications increased wheat grain zinc concentration from 18 mg·kg–1 in the control to 40 mg·kg–1.

    Development of ZnO Nanoparticles as an Efficient Zn Fertilizer: Using Synchrotron-Based Techniques and Laser Ablation to Examine Elemental Distribution in Wheat Grain · 2020 · compared with control

    Same direction

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Foliar application led to less than 1% of fertilizer nitrogen absorbed into wheat grain.

    EFFECTS OF FOLIAR- AND SOIL-APPLIED NITROGEN AND SOIL NITRATE-NITROGEN LEVEL ON THE PROTEIN CONTENT OF NEEPAWA WHEAT · 1972

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar P addition did not downregulate root P uptake in wheat (isotopic dilution test of the substitution hypothesis)

    Assessment of foliar-applied phosphorus fertiliser formulations to enhance phosphorus nutrition and grain production in wheat · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Zn concentration in wheat was not changed when plants were sprayed at early stem elongation.

    Effects of foliar application of zinc sulfate at different phenological stages on yield formation and grain zinc content of bread wheat (cv. Kohdasht) · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar N had no adverse effect on grain nitrogen/sulphur ratio in cv. Avalon.

    Recovery of 15N‐labelled urea applied to the foliage of winter wheat · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Foliar P had limited effect on phytate and grain iron content.

    Response of canola, wheat, and pea to foliar phosphorus fertilization at a phosphorus-deficient site in eastern Saskatchewan · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Increasing foliar potassium rate did not improve grain nutrient content.

    EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM ON YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT OF WHEAT GRAINS GROWN IN SANDY SOILS · 1999

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Mendok sprays did not cause male or female gamete sterility in wheat.

    Increase in Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. variety ‘N.P. 718’) · 1969

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    T1 increased Pb concentration in wheat leaves relative to CK.

    Stomata as the Main Pathway for the Penetration of Atmospheric Particulate Matter Pb into Wheat Leaves · 2025 · compared with control group (CK)

    Opposite direction

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Non-indigenous AMF inoculation did not increase wheat Zn uptake.

    Green Manure Addition to Soil Increases Grain Zinc Concentration in Bread Wheat · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    AMF inoculation did not increase plant P, N, Zn, Cu, Fe or Mn uptake.

    Potential of AM Fungi in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Effect on Yield of Wheat Crop · 2014 · compared with uninoculated crop

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Standard treatment without bacterial inoculation resulted in very low P uptake in the plants.

    Improvement of wheat and cotton growth and nutrient uptake by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. · 2004

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    B. subtilis IB-22 inoculation did not change root potassium.

    Influence of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria on the Formation of Apoplastic Barriers and Uptake of Water and Potassium by Wheat Plants · 2023

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil inoculation had no significant effect on wheat Ca under non-saline conditions.

    Synergistic Effect between Azotobacter vinelandii and Streptomyces sp. Isolated From Saline Soil on Seed Germination and Growth of Wheat Plant · 2012

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Microbial inoculation had no significant effect on shoot Zn.

    The effect of PGPR inoculation on the growth of wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculation with Zn solubilizing bacteria (ZSB) did not increase soil Zn availability or wheat Zn uptake.

    Green manure effect on the ability of native and inoculated soil bacteria to mobilize zinc for wheat uptake (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Heavy metal content did not change substantially between plants infected with Fusarium culmorum and uninfected plants.

    Influence of Soil Copper Pollution and Fusarium culmorum on the Heavy Metal Content in Wheat · 2007 · compared with uninfected

    Opposite direction

268 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.