Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T2 produced maximum polar diameter, 5.17.

A claim from Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) to Foliar Application of Nano Urea and Urea · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T2 produced maximum polar diameter, 5.17.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
treatment T2 with 25% reduced nitrogen application plus foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea on 30 and 60 DATe0
Outcome
polar diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5.17e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0
Setting
Jabalpure1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all the treatments, treatment T2 with 25% reduced nitrogen application plus foliar spray of 0.4% nano urea on 30 and 60 DAT recorded maximum plant height on 90 DAT (57.82 cm),number of leaves (9.13), equatorial diameter (5.51 cm), polar diameter (5.17), average bulb weight (69.56 g), bulb yield (336.40 kg) than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1340
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17
e1

“Jabalpur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–120

Title

Response of Onion (Allium cepa L.) to Foliar Application of Nano Urea and Urea

Priyanka Mishra Dubey; Jagrati Upadhyay; Sayan Chowdhury; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113339

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-921e5bcebcad152e365af1238fd23f63c7678c55b76ca6eb7c823323a7623da0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 70 positive, 4 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.