Paper · 2013 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Effects of Spraying Nitrogen and Zinc Fertilizers after Flowering on Grain Weight and Nutritional Quality of Winter Wheat

Guo Tian-cai

14
claims
37
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to understand the effect of spraying fertilizers after flowering on grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars,twenty cultivars,widely used in Huang-huai wheat planting zone,were used to investigate their effects on thousand kernel weight(TKW),phytic acid content(PAC),contents of Fe,Zn and Mg by spraying zinc and nitrogen fertilizers after flowering.The results showed that TKW were increased by 1.33 and 1.43 g,respectively,after spraying zinc and nitrogen.There were 5% significant difference observed between the treatments and control.The protein content in grains was increased dramatically after fertilizer spraying,and the effect of nitrogen fertilizer was greater than zinc fertilizer.The PAC was decreased significantly after zinc treatment;meanwhile,the largest decrease was observed in cultivar 955159 by 27.95%.However,no significant difference was observed between the nitrogen treatment and control.Zn content in wheat grains were increased after spraying zinc fertilizer.But,no significant effect was observed on the contents of Fe and Mg.The contents of Fe and Zn were increased significantly after spraying nitrogen,and the average increase was shown by 36.88% and 11.25% respectively.However,the Mg content in grains was declined after spring nitrogen fertilizer.The bioavailability of zinc in grains was increased significantly after spring zinc fertilizer,and the bioavailability of iron was also increased greatly after spring nitrogen fertilizer.In conclusion,spraying nitrogen and zinc fertilizer after flowering properly could increase both grain weight and nutrition content.These results would provide useful information for improving wheat nutrition quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying zinc after flowering increased winter wheat thousand kernel weight by 1.33 g.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
spraying zince1
Outcome
TKWe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.33e1
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Huang-huai wheat planting zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“TKW were increased by 1.33 and 1.43 g,respectively,after spraying zinc and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were 5% significant difference observed between the treatments and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–579 · show in text ↑
e3

“widely used in Huang-huai wheat planting zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nitrogen after flowering increased winter wheat thousand kernel weight by 1.43 g.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
nitrogene1
Outcome
TKWe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.43e1
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“TKW were increased by 1.33 and 1.43 g,respectively,after spraying zinc and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were 5% significant difference observed between the treatments and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer spraying after flowering increased grain protein content dramatically.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
fertilizer sprayinge4
Outcome
protein content in grainse4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
dramaticallye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“The protein content in grains was increased dramatically after fertilizer spraying,and the effect of nitrogen fertilizer was greater than zinc fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on grain protein content was greater than that of zinc fertilizer.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere4
Outcome
protein content in grainse4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
zinc fertilizere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“The protein content in grains was increased dramatically after fertilizer spraying,and the effect of nitrogen fertilizer was greater than zinc fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–733 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment decreased phytic acid content significantly in winter wheat grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
zinc treatmente5
Outcome
phytic acid contente6
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“The PAC was decreased significantly after zinc treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–790 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were 5% significant difference observed between the treatments and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–579 · show in text ↑
e6

“phytic acid content(PAC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment decreased PAC by 27.95% in cultivar 955159, the largest decrease among the cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
955159e7
Treatment
zinc treatmente7
Outcome
PACe7
Direction
decreasee7
Value
27.95%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“The PAC was decreased significantly after zinc treatment;meanwhile,the largest decrease was observed in cultivar 955159 by 27.95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen treatment did not change phytic acid content significantly compared with the control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
nitrogen treatmente7
Outcome
phytic acid contente6
Direction
no significant differencee7
Comparator
controle7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e7

“However,no significant difference was observed between the nitrogen treatment and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–953 · show in text ↑
e6

“phytic acid content(PAC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying zinc fertilizer increased grain Zn content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spraying zinc fertilizere1
Outcome
Zn content in wheat grainse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn content in wheat grains were increased after spraying zinc fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying zinc fertilizer had no significant effect on grain Fe and Mg contents.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spraying zinc fertilizere1
Outcome
contents of Fe and Mge7
Direction
no significant effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn content in wheat grains were increased after spraying zinc fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1026 · show in text ↑
e7

“But,no significant effect was observed on the contents of Fe and Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nitrogen increased grain Fe content by 36.88% on average.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spraying nitrogene1
Outcome
contents of Fe and Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
36.88%e2
Qualifier
average increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The contents of Fe and Zn were increased significantly after spraying nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1173 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average increase was shown by 36.88% and 11.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying nitrogen increased grain Zn content by 11.25% on average.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spraying nitrogene1
Outcome
contents of Fe and Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11.25%e2
Qualifier
average increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The contents of Fe and Zn were increased significantly after spraying nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1173 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average increase was shown by 36.88% and 11.25% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nitrogen fertilizer declined grain Mg content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spring nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
Mg content in grainse1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Mg content in grains was declined after spring nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring zinc fertilizer increased grain zinc bioavailability significantly.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spring zinc fertilizere1
Outcome
bioavailability of zinc in grainse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“The bioavailability of zinc in grains was increased significantly after spring zinc fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nitrogen fertilizer increased grain iron bioavailability.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
spring nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
bioavailability of irone1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain weight and nutritional quality of different winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–149 · show in text ↑
e1

“the bioavailability of iron was also increased greatly after spring nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1508 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.