Paper · 2020 · Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference The Fifth Technological Order: Prospects for the Development and Modernization of the Russian Agro-Industrial Sector (TFTS 2019)

Efficiency of Foliar Feeding with Zinc and Copper Chelates of Spring Soft Wheat in the Conditions of the Southern Forest-Steppe of the Omsk Irtysh Region

Igor Bobrenko; Valentina Popova; Natalia Goman; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The results of experiments on the use of zinc and copper chelates in the cultivation of spring wheat in the conditions of the southern forest-steppe of the Omsk Irtysh region by the method of foliar feeding are presented. The best doses of zinc and copper in foliar feeding in the tillering phase is 20 (yield increase of 0.25 t/ha, in the control of 2.09 t/ha) and 10 g/ha (0.26 t/ha), respectively. Protein collection thus increased from 273 in the control to 297-327 kg/ha with the use of chelates, the germination energy of the obtained seeds increased from 95 in the control to 96.3-98.0 % fromthe foliar feeding in the tillering phase. The best in weight of 1000 grains (33.5 g) was Zn20 variant, and in grain unit (735 g/l) -Cu10, which exceeds the control parameters (30.05 g and 711 g/l, respectively). The gluten content was 26.70-27.85 % (with GDI 57.5-62.5 units), in the best yield variants (Zn10 and Cu10) it was at the maximum level of 27.30 and 27.85 %, respectively. The amount of amino acids in the protein increases from 7,580 % without fertilizers to the highest 7,660 % with foliar feeding with chelated forms of Zn10 and 7,645 % -at Cu30.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc at 20 g/ha increased yield by 0.25 t/ha.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
zince0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.25 t/hae0
Qualifier
20e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best doses of zinc and copper in foliar feeding in the tillering phase is 20 (yield increase of 0.25 t/ha, in the control of 2.09 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–361 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar copper at 10 g/ha increased yield by 0.26 t/ha.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
coppere1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
0.26 t/hae0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 g/ha (0.26 t/ha), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“zinc and copper in foliar feeding in the tillering phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–296 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield increase of 0.25 t/ha, in the control of 2.09 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–360 · show in text ↑
e3

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chelate use increased protein collection to 297-327 kg/ha from 273 in controls.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
chelatese0
Outcome
Protein collectione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
297-327 kg/hae0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein collection thus increased from 273 in the control to 297-327 kg/ha with the use of chelates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–500 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar feeding in the tillering phase increased seed germination energy to 96.3-98.0%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
foliar feeding in the tillering phasee0
Outcome
germination energye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
96.3-98.0 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the germination energy of the obtained seeds increased from 95 in the control to 96.3-98.0 % fromthe foliar feeding in the tillering phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn20 gave the best 1000-grain weight of 33.5 g.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Zn20e0
Outcome
weight of 1000 grainse0
Direction
beste0
Value
33.5 ge0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best in weight of 1000 grains (33.5 g) was Zn20 variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“control parameters (30.05 g and 711 g/l, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–810 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu10 gave the best grain unit of 735 g/l.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Cu10e0
Outcome
grain unite0
Direction
exceedse0
Value
735 g/le0
Comparator
control parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in grain unit (735 g/l) -Cu10, which exceeds the control parameters (30.05 g and 711 g/l, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn10 had maximum gluten content of 27.30%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Zn10e0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gluten content was 26.70-27.85 % (with GDI 57.5-62.5 units), in the best yield variants (Zn10 and Cu10) it was at the maximum level of 27.30 and 27.85 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu10 had maximum gluten content of 27.85%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Cu10e0
Outcome
gluten contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
27.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The gluten content was 26.70-27.85 % (with GDI 57.5-62.5 units), in the best yield variants (Zn10 and Cu10) it was at the maximum level of 27.30 and 27.85 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn10 foliar chelate raised protein amino acids to 7,660%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
foliar feeding with chelated forms of Zn10e0
Outcome
amount of amino acids in the proteine0
Direction
increasese0
Value
7,660 %e0
Comparator
without fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of amino acids in the protein increases from 7,580 % without fertilizers to the highest 7,660 % with foliar feeding with chelated forms of Zn10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1138 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu30 foliar chelate raised protein amino acids to 7,645%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Cu30e0
Outcome
amount of amino acids in the proteine1
Direction
increasese1
Value
7,645 %e0
Comparator
without fertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7,645 % -at Cu30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of amino acids in the protein increases from 7,580 % without fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1067 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–100 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

micronutrient · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.