Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive Rabi seasons 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Students’ Instructional Farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. The field experiment allocated three irrigation scheduling namely: I1: two irrigations at CRI (crown root initiation) and Jointing stage, I2: three irrigations at CRI, Jointing and Booting stage and I3: Four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage, two moisture conservation practices viz: M0: without mulching and M1: Organic mulch at the rate of 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray and three nutrient management practices viz: N1: 100% Recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) (150:60:40 kg ha-1 NPK), N2: 85% RDF + Farm yard manure (FYM) @ 5.0 t ha-1 and N3: 75% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1. The field experiment was laid out in double split plot design with three replications. On pooled basis of two years experimentation the results indicated that, four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage recorded significantly highest value of crop growth rate (CGR) (13.15 and 19.28 g m-2 day-1 at 30-60 and 60-90 days after sowing (DAS), respectively), grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1) and consumptive use of water (457.39 mm) while, significantly highest water use efficiency (11.97 kg ha-1 mm) was received under two irrigations at CRI and Jointing stage over the rest of irrigation schedules. In respect of moisture conservation practices, organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray recorded significantly water use efficiency (11.41 kg ha-1 mm) compared to without mulching treatment while, highest consumptive use of water (380.72 mm) was recorded under without mulching. Integration of 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly maximum water use efficiency (10.99 kg ha-1 mm) compared to other treatments while, highest consumptive use of water (381.41 mm) was recorded under the treatment of 100% RDF.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations gave the highest crop growth rate at 30–60 and 60–90 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stagee0
- Outcome
- crop growth rate (CGR)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 13.15 and 19.28 g m-2 day-1e0
- Qualifier
- 30-60 and 60-90 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage recorded significantly highest value of crop growth rate (CGR) (13.15 and 19.28 g m-2 day-1 at 30-60 and 60-90 days after sowing (DAS), respectively)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations gave the highest grain yield of 4381.60 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4381.60 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage recorded significantly highest value of crop growth rate (CGR) (13.15 and 19.28 g m-2 day-1 at 30-60 and 60-90 days after sowing (DAS), respectively), grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations gave the highest consumptive water use of 457.39 mm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- consumptive use of watere0
- Value
- 457.39 mme0
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1) and consumptive use of water (457.39 mm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave the highest water use efficiency of 11.97 kg ha-1 mm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- two irrigations at CRI and Jointing stagee0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.97 kg ha-1 mme0
- Comparator
- the rest of irrigation schedulese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“significantly highest water use efficiency (11.97 kg ha-1 mm) was received under two irrigations at CRI and Jointing stage over the rest of irrigation schedules”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic mulch and kaolin increased water use efficiency to 11.41 kg ha-1 mm versus no mulch.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spraye0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Value
- 11.41 kg ha-1 mme0
- Comparator
- without mulching treatmente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray recorded significantly water use efficiency (11.41 kg ha-1 mm) compared to without mulching treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Water consumption was highest without mulch at 380.72 mm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- without mulchinge0
- Outcome
- consumptive use of watere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 380.72 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“highest consumptive use of water (380.72 mm) was recorded under without mulching”
Claim · model-written summary
85% RDF plus farmyard manure maximized water use efficiency at 10.99 kg ha-1 mm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1e0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 10.99 kg ha-1 mme0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly maximum water use efficiency (10.99 kg ha-1 mm) compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF gave the highest consumptive water use at 381.41 mm.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- consumptive use of watere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 381.41 mme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”
e0“highest consumptive use of water (381.41 mm) was recorded under the treatment of 100% RDF”
The same questions in other papers
organic · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →fertilization · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
238 papers more in this group
See all 242 papers →tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
299 papers more in this group
See all 303 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.