View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
biomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Larix accumulated more foliage biomass regardless of conditions.
regardless of conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “regardless of conditions, Larix accumulated more foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under thinning, branch number and foliage per branch contributed nearly equally to foliage biomass in crease.
Verbatim
t0 “lodgepole pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 e0 “these mechanisms were almost equally important to the in crease in foliage biomass due to thinning ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2378 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter was 35% of fresh foliage biomass .
fresh foliage biomass e0 fresh foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “it was 35% of the fresh foliage biomass and 60% of the fresh woody biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2675–2749 t0 “Black wattle (Acacia mearnsii ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–30 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
About 50% of biomass was lost over winter, mainly foliage .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “About 50% of the biomass was lost during the winter, mainly in foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–850 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass .
total foliage biomass e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Shortleaf Pine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97 e0 “thinning seemed to reduce the total foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1045 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Larix accumulated more foliage biomass regardless of conditions.
regardless of conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “regardless of conditions, Larix accumulated more foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–844 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass was reduced in dry conditions.
Verbatim
e0 “Pine had reduced foliage biomass in dry conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–687 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Pine foliage biomass in creased in moist conditions.
moist conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “an in crease in foliage biomass was observed in moist conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–761 e1 “subgenus Pinus spp. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–479 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
biomass value of the male foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2272 t0 “Rhamnus davurica
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 Other claims from this paper (19) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Exocarpos foliage supported greater arthropod biomass than equivalent Acacia foliage .
arthropods in their foliage e0 Acacia foliagee0 Verbatim
e0 “Exocarpos supported abundant arthropods in their foliage – significantly higher in biomass than for equivalent volumes of Acacia foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1513 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The most susceptible genotypes lost root and foliage biomass .
most susceptible genotypes e0 biomass loss in root and foliage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Avocado ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 e0 “biomass loss in root and foliage in the most susceptible genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1304 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Tomato foliage biomass fell 40–53% in Petula.
foliage dry weight biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Tomato foliage dry weight biomass was diminished by 40 to 53% (P) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1529 e1 “potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–60 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass equations were similar between the two zones.
distribution zones e0 Verbatim
e0 “Allometric equations to predict the foliage biomass of T. in dica were similar for its distribution zones in Burkina Faso ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1226 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
DBH regressions predicted branch and foliage biomass poorly.
biomass of branch and foliage e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “the precision and reliability were poor of the regressions between the DBH and the biomass of branch and foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–948 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The study provides equations to convert foliage biomass to surface area for most encountered species.
forest communities t0 converting from foliage biomass to surface area e0 most species encountered e0 foliage biomass e0 Verbatim
e0 “Equations for converting from foliage biomass to surface area are in cluded for most species encountered ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–449 t0 “forest communities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
rd29A-driven expression significantly in creased foliage biomass .
TPS1‐TPS2 expression driven by the rd29A promoter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “TPS1‐TPS2 expression driven by the rd29A promoter improved growth and provoked a significant in crease in plant biomass at the foliage level in the different transgenic lines. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1209 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
rd29A-driven TPS1-TPS2 expression improved growth.
TPS1‐TPS2 expression driven by the rd29A promoter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “TPS1‐TPS2 expression driven by the rd29A promoter improved growth and provoked a significant in crease in plant biomass at the foliage level in the different transgenic lines. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1209 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–69 Other claims from this paper (7)
not stated 2 Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Most of the Fe aerosolised during biomass burning is accounted for by soil-suspended particles.
Fe aerosolized during biomass burning is accounted for by soil e3 Verbatim
e0 “We examined foliage representative of four distinct biomes subject to frequent burning events ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–475 e3 “Most of the Fe aerosolized during biomass burning is accounted for by soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1064 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Sample cleaning is recommended to qualify the washoff of dry deposition from foliage and to separate superficially absorbed and biomass - in corporated elements
Sample cleaning is recommended e2 Verbatim
e1 “Chemical foliar analysis is a tool widely used to study tree nutrition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70 e2 “Sample cleaning is recommended in order (1) to in vestigate the transfer rate of chemical elements from soil to plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–938 e3 “to qualify the washoff of dry deposition from foliage and (3) to separate superficially absorbed and biomass - in corporated elements ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1074 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Rhamnus davurica
Larix
Pinus contorta
Acacia mearnsii
Pinus echinata
Pinus
Exocarpos
Persea americana
Solanum lycopersicum
Potato spindle tuber viroid_%E0%A4%87%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B2%E0%A5%80_Tree.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Tamarindus indica
Medicago sativa