View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Exponential functions offered little advantage over polynomials in model tests.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “exponential functions have little advantage over polynomials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–275 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors judge nutrient conditioning of little advantage to transplant growers.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “PNC offers the transplant grower little advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–835 t0 “Watermelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High density offered little advantage over medium density.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatormedium density e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–474 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Compounds with little or no selective advantage are discarded.
Verbatim
e0 “Compounds providing little or no selective advantage are discarded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–516 t0 “Asteridae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage .
Organ / stageupper leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516 t0 “corn leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Allowing unchopped silage to reach 100°F offered little or no advantage .
Treatmentallowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F e0 Outcomelittle or no advantage e0 Directionlittle or no advantage e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There appeared to be little or no advantage in allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–620 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Accumulating six years of crops gave little advantage over four years in reducing the coefficient of variation.
Outcomecoefficient of variation e7 Directionlittle advantage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Apple Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 e0 “six years gave little advantage over four ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–359 e7 “obtain a low coefficient of variation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–279 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors infer little advantage from sourcing black spruce seed outside the region.
Outcomelittle advantage in going outside the region to obtain black spruce seed e0 Verbatim
e0 “there is little advantage in going outside the region to obtain black spruce seed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–498 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Cone traits that differed between cone types conferred little seed survival advantage under simulated fire.
Treatmentsimulated fire e2 Outcomeseed survival advantage e2 Verbatim
t0 “serotinous and nonserotinous conifers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–97 e2 “those that differed (e.g. density and moisture) conferred little seed survival advantage under simulated fire ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–775 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Exponential functions offered little advantage over polynomials in model tests.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “exponential functions have little advantage over polynomials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–275 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days after ease of calculation was considered.
Treatmentdegree-day accumulations e0 Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatorcalendar days e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 e0 “The use of degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days when the ease of calculation for calendar days was considered. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Accumulating six years of crops gave little advantage over four years in reducing the coefficient of variation.
Outcomecoefficient of variation e7 Directionlittle advantage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Apple Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 e0 “six years gave little advantage over four ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–359 e7 “obtain a low coefficient of variation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–279 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.
Outcomelittle yield advantage e0 Qualifierwhen harvested as hay e0 Comparatoralfalfa monocultures e0 Verbatim
e0 “alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides gave little advantage in bacterial spot control.
Treatmentmixing kasugamycin with other fungicides e0 DirectionLittle advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Little advantage in disease control was observed by mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–459 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding orange oil or canola oil to vinegar sprays gave little or no advantage .
Treatmentadding either orange oil or canola oil to vinegar spray solutions e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “little or no advantage to adding either orange oil or canola oil to vinegar spray solutions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2622–2713 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Compounds with little or no selective advantage are discarded.
Verbatim
e0 “Compounds providing little or no selective advantage are discarded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–516 t0 “Asteridae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus additions provided little short-term advantage .
Outcomeshort-term advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Little short-term advantage accrued from additions of phosphorus or potassium. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–634 e1 “Seed of the coastal, dune-building grass Leymus arenarius is harvested from natural stands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–183 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium additions provided little short-term advantage .
Outcomeshort-term advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Little short-term advantage accrued from additions of phosphorus or potassium. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–634 e1 “Seed of the coastal, dune-building grass Leymus arenarius is harvested from natural stands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–183 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Small flower size offers little or no advantage in terms of autofertility in Crepis tectorum .
Treatmentsmall flower size e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “Floral reduction inCrepis tectorum(Asteraceae): tradeoffs and dominance relationships ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 e1 “small flower size offers little or no advantage in terms of autofertility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–599 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Normal pollen had little competitive advantage over 3D-deficient pollen in selfed substitution monosomics.
Outcomelittle competitive advantage e0 Comparatorpollen deficient for chromosome 3D e0 Verbatim
e0 “Normal pollen with chromosome 3D from Red Bobs had little competitive advantage over pollen deficient for chromosome 3D when a substituted monosomic line of wheat derived from the hybrid Rescue × Golden Ball was selfed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors find little advantage to M IX rootstock for shortening apple juvenility unless orchard space is limited.
Outcomeusing a rootstock such as M IX for shortening the juvenile period e0 Qualifierunless orchard space is limited e0 Verbatim
e0 “unless orchard space is limited, there is little advantage in using a rootstock such as M IX for shortening the juvenile period of apple seedlings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–875 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Combining neighboring breeding-program subpopulations gave little to no advantage in prediction.
Outcomelittle to no advantage e0 Comparatorsubpopulations that correspond to neighboring breeding programs e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage to combining subpopulations that correspond to neighboring breeding programs to increase TP size ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1275 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Random mating F2 before selection and inbreeding offers little to no advantage .
Outcomelittle to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our results suggest little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2014 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors infer little advantage of larger effective population sizes for short-term selection.
Outcomeusing larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage of using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1572 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.