View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 246 Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “hornbeam had the largest foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–951 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass at exponent 0·78.
Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “foliage biomass scaled with crown woody biomass with an exponent of 0·78 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1050 t0 “trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–48 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage accounted for 3.36% of aboveground biomass .
Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “foliage (3.36%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1054 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
All treatments allocated the most biomass to foliage .
more biomass to foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “All treatments allocated more biomass to foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1986–2034 t0 “Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1129 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
FRA produced 759 g foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “FRA treatment which produced a mean of 759 g foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1604 t0 “Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1129 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
N was the most abundant nutrient in all treatments and highest in foliage biomass .
Verbatim
e0 “N was generally the most abundant nutrient in all treatments and was highest in foliage biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2567–2662 t0 “Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1129 Other claims from this paper (18) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Diameter at breast height and tree age were most appropriate for estimating foliage biomass of predominant and dominant Scots pine trees.
diameter at breast height and tree age e0 Verbatim
e0 “to estimate foliage biomass of predominant and dominant trees, it seems most appropriate to apply diameter at breast height and tree age ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–960 t0 “Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–72 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The foliage share in tree greenery biomass varied widely in the two species.
foliage share in the tree greenery biomass structure e0 Verbatim
e0 “the foliage share in the tree greenery biomass structure had a wide range of values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–668 e1 “Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Black locust)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–347 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage share decreased as mensurational in dex values in creased.
foliage share in tree greenery biomass e0 increasing mensurational index values e0 Verbatim
e0 “The foliage share in tree greenery biomass decreased with in creasing mensurational in dex values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–919 e1 “Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Black locust)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–347 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Diseased chickpea plants had reduced root biomass and chlorotic foliage .
reduced total root biomass associated with less vigorous and chlorotic foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “Diseased plants showed a reduced total root biomass associated with less vigorous and chlorotic foliage . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–323 t0 “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–113 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fixed nitrogen in chickpea foliage ranged from 13 to 49%.
amount of fixed nitrogen e2 Verbatim
t0 “Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) germplasm accessions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–73 e2 “The amount of fixed nitrogen ranged from 13 to 49% in foliage , 30 to 44% in grain and 28 to 40% in total above-ground biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1004 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes differed significantly in plant height, number of foliage and number of primary branches.
plant height, number of foliage, number of primary branch e1 Verbatim
e0 “Ethiopian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–112 e1 “The analysis of variance result in dicated that there was a significant (P<0.01) difference amongst genotypes for plant height, number of foliage , number of primary branch, growth rate, and fresh biomass weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–487 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The foliage share in tree greenery biomass varied widely in the two species.
foliage share in the tree greenery biomass structure e0 Verbatim
e0 “the foliage share in the tree greenery biomass structure had a wide range of values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–668 e1 “Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Black locust)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–347 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliage share decreased as mensurational in dex values in creased.
foliage share in tree greenery biomass e0 increasing mensurational index values e0 Verbatim
e0 “The foliage share in tree greenery biomass decreased with in creasing mensurational in dex values ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–919 e1 “Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) and Robinia pseudoacacia L. (Black locust)
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–347 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Early in summer, phosphorus was significantly lower in untreated black locust foliage than in in secticide-treated foliage .
canopy arthropods e0 herbivore Phosphorus concentrations e1 insecticide—treated foliage e1 Southern Appalachians t0 Verbatim
e0 “consumption by canopy arthropods on foliage nutrient content, canopy leachates (throughfall), and biomass of 4—yr—old black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia ) and red maple (Acer rubrum ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–206 e1 “Phosphorus concentrations in untreated black locust foliage were significantly lower than those of in secticide—treated foliage early in summer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–537 t0 “in the Southern Appalachians ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–158 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Primed seeds produced greater foliage area and dry biomass than unprimed seeds.
area of plant foliage area and amount of dry biomass e0 non-rimed seeds e0 Verbatim
e0 “Primed seeds produced significantly larger area of plant foliage area and amount of dry biomass than non-rimed seeds. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3458–3575 t0 “sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–54 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SV 887 had higher fresh foliage biomass than SV 889 by 27.5%.
Verbatim
e0 “Sugar beet showed the highest fresh foliage , root and total biomass (21.53, 64.63 and 86.16 t/ha) in variety SV 887, with in creased magnitude of fresh foliage , root and total biomass to the tune of 27.5, 10.6 and 14.4%, respectively, over variety SV 889. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–1082 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds in creased fresh foliage biomass over flat beds by 40.3%.
Verbatim
e0 “Significantly the maximum values for fresh foliage , root and total biomass of sugarbeet were observed in raised bed (23.36, 68.36 and 91.72 t/ha), being 40.3, 22.3 and 26.5% higher, respec- tively, over flat bed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–710 t0 “sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–69 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher leaf area in dex corresponded to more foliage aggregation and lower light- in terception efficiency.
light-interception efficiency e0 higher degree of foliage aggregation at larger values of L e0 Verbatim
e0 “a higher degree of foliage aggregation at larger values of L, leading to lower light- in terception efficiency in stands with greater total leaf area ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–627 t0 “poplar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101 t1 “Petiole length and biomass in vestment in support modify light in terception efficiency in dense poplar plantations ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil nutrient availability correlated with foliage or litter nutrient concentrations by clone.
foliage or leaf litter nutrient concentrations e0 soil nutrient availability e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “between soil nutrient availability and foliage or leaf litter nutrient concentrations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–778 t0 “Hybrid Poplars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Green foliage and litter nutrient concentrations had clone-specific correlations.
correlation patterns between green foliage and leaf litter nutrient concentrations e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Clone-specific correlation patterns between green foliage and leaf litter nutrient concentrations were observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–679 t0 “Hybrid Poplars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Dinitroaniline herbicides did not affect peanut foliage biomass at mid or late season.
Dinitroaniline herbicides e0 mid- and late-season e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Dinitroaniline herbicides neither visually in jured peanut nor affected foliage biomass collected at mid- and late-season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–836 t0 “Peanut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Temperature had no significant effect on peanut foliage biomass yield.
foliage biomass yield e3 no significant effect e3 Verbatim
e0 “The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under in vestigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 e1 “Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 e3 “Temperature had no significant effect on foliage biomass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1020 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass than under 12/12 h light.
Verbatim
e0 “The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under in vestigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 e1 “Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667 e2 “Plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass , lower pod and mature seed yields, and lower harvest in dices ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–956 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient pools of Pinus massoniana varied with biomass pools, except for foliage .
except for foliage e3 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Pinus massoniana
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 e3 “Nutrient pools varied with biomass pools except for foliage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–342 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthetic rate was the main physiological factor determining primary needle seedling biomass .
PNS biomass accumulation e0 main physiological factor e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The Pn was the main physiological factor determining PNS biomass accumulation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1816 t0 “Pinus massoniana (Lamb.) Seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–128 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthetic pigments in directly promoted biomass through in creased stem soluble sugar synthesis.
indirectly increasing soluble sugar synthesis in the stems e0 Verbatim
e0 “promoted biomass by in directly in creasing soluble sugar synthesis in the stems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1737 t0 “Pinus massoniana (Lamb.) Seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–128 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spruce allocated a much larger fraction of biomass to foliage than beech.
portion of biomass into the foliage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The spruce allocated a much larger portion of biomass in to the foliage than beech ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–436 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
With 1oC warming, spruce foliage biomass in creased most in cold, moisture deficient regions.
spruce foliage biomass e0 cold regions with insufficient moisture supply e0 Verbatim
e0 “When the temperature in creases by 1oC, the most in crease in spruce foliage biomass occurs in cold regions with in sufficient moisture supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1139 t0 “Picea spp.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–40 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spruce had greater foliage and height growth.
foliage and height growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “had greater foliage and height growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2655 e1 “Spruce allocated more to growth, biomass , and photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2553–2613 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Pinus taeda
Pinus sylvestris
Robinia pseudoacacia
Cicer arietinum
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Populus
Arachis hypogaea
Pinus massoniana
Picea