Search claims · PlantClaims

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.

Taxon: Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome: biomass value of the male foliagee0
Direction: greatere0
Comparator: femalese0

Verbatim

e0
“The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551

t0
“Rhamnus davurica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59

Title

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Branch reproductive biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Branch flower biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Observation Flower, foliage and reproduction biomass differed significantly among individuals.
Observation Mean female flower biomass was 1.84 times male flower biomass.
Observation Mean female reproduction biomass was 16 times male reproduction biomass.
Observation Shrub flower and reproductive biomass and diameter increment differed significantly by sex.
Observation Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Association DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter increment.
Observation Female shrub flower biomass was 1.6 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub reproductive biomass was 1.93 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass.
Observation Female diameter increment exceeded male diameter increment by 3.04.
Observation Males began flowering earlier than females, on 25 May versus 28 May.
Observation Females began fruiting on 8 June.
Observation The plot contained 310 female, 53 male and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010.
Observation The population sex ratio of 0.17 significantly deviated from 1:1.
Observation The 0–2, 2–4, 4–6 and 6–8 cm DBH classes had female-biased sex ratios.
Observation Mean annual ring widths were 0.78 mm for males and 0.83mm for females; authors concluded growth allocation did not follow trade-off theory.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon: Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome: foliage biomasse0
Comparator: sexese0

Verbatim

e0
“there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass(P0.05)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1813

t0
“Rhamnus davurica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59

Title

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Branch reproductive biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Branch flower biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Observation Flower, foliage and reproduction biomass differed significantly among individuals.
Observation Mean female flower biomass was 1.84 times male flower biomass.
Observation Mean female reproduction biomass was 16 times male reproduction biomass.
Observation Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
Observation Shrub flower and reproductive biomass and diameter increment differed significantly by sex.
Association DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter increment.
Observation Female shrub flower biomass was 1.6 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub reproductive biomass was 1.93 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass.
Observation Female diameter increment exceeded male diameter increment by 3.04.
Observation Males began flowering earlier than females, on 25 May versus 28 May.
Observation Females began fruiting on 8 June.
Observation The plot contained 310 female, 53 male and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010.
Observation The population sex ratio of 0.17 significantly deviated from 1:1.
Observation The 0–2, 2–4, 4–6 and 6–8 cm DBH classes had female-biased sex ratios.
Observation Mean annual ring widths were 0.78 mm for males and 0.83mm for females; authors concluded growth allocation did not follow trade-off theory.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon: Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome: foliage biomasse0
Comparator: the sexese0

Verbatim

e0
“there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031

t0
“Rhamnus davurica”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59

Title

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Branch reproductive biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Branch flower biomass differed significantly by sex.
Observation Flower, foliage and reproduction biomass differed significantly among individuals.
Observation Mean female flower biomass was 1.84 times male flower biomass.
Observation Mean female reproduction biomass was 16 times male reproduction biomass.
Observation Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.
Observation Shrub flower and reproductive biomass and diameter increment differed significantly by sex.
Observation Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.
Association DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter increment.
Observation Female shrub flower biomass was 1.6 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub reproductive biomass was 1.93 times male biomass.
Observation Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass.
Observation Female diameter increment exceeded male diameter increment by 3.04.
Observation Males began flowering earlier than females, on 25 May versus 28 May.
Observation Females began fruiting on 8 June.
Observation The plot contained 310 female, 53 male and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010.
Observation The population sex ratio of 0.17 significantly deviated from 1:1.
Observation The 0–2, 2–4, 4–6 and 6–8 cm DBH classes had female-biased sex ratios.
Observation Mean annual ring widths were 0.78 mm for males and 0.83mm for females; authors concluded growth allocation did not follow trade-off theory.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Survival, foliage biomass and crown ratio did not differ significantly.

Taxon: EucalyptusEucalyptust0
Outcome: survival, foliage biomass, and crown ratioe0

Verbatim

e0
“except for survival, foliage biomass, and crown ratio (p>0.05)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–1919

t0
“Eucalyptus species”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–104

Title

The growth, aboveground biomass, crown development, and leaf characteristics of three Eucalyptus species at initial stage of planting in Jepara, Indonesia

PANDU YUDHA ADI PUTRA WIRABUANA; Syamsu Alam; Jeriels Matatula; et al. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 2021. doi:10.13057/biodiv/d220550

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Most measured traits differed significantly among species.
Observation E. pellita had relatively better height of 3.00±0.21 m.
Observation E. pellita had relatively better aboveground biomass of 49.86±3.60 kg ha-1.
Observation E. pellita had relatively better crown projection area of 2.68±0.27 m2.
Observation E. pellita had relatively better leaf area index of 5.76±0.44.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature had no significant effect on peanut foliage biomass yield.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: Temperaturee3
Outcome: foliage biomass yielde3
Direction: no significant effecte3
Comparator: constant 28e1

Verbatim

e0
“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56

e1
“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667

e3
“Temperature had no significant effect on foliage biomass yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1020

Title

Continuous Daily Light Period and Temperature Influence Peanut Yield in Nutrient Film Technique

T. Rowell; D. G. Mortley; P. A. Loretan; et al. Crop Science 1999. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900040026x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light produced more foliage biomass than under 12/12 h light.
Intervention effect Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light had lower pod and mature seed yields than under 12/12 h light.
Intervention effect Peanut plants exposed to 24/0 h light had lower harvest indices than under 12/12 h light.
Intervention effect Diurnal 28/22°C produced higher pod and immature seed yield than constant 28°C.
Intervention effect Diurnal 28/22°C produced a higher harvest index than constant 28°C.
Intervention effect Peanut plants grown at a 12/12 h light period had a higher mean number of flowers reaching anthesis than at 24/0 h, regardless of temperature.
Intervention effect Peanut plants grown at a 12/12 h light period had higher leaf net photosynthetic rates and stomatal conductance than at 24/0 h.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage allocation coefficient did not vary significantly with tree size.

Taxon: Elmt0
Material: size of treese0
Outcome: biomass allocation coefficient of foliagee0
Direction: did not produce significant effecte0

Verbatim

e0
“The size of trees did not produce significant effect on the biomass allocation coefficient of foliage (BACf).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1307

t0
“Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–69

Title

Biomass Allocation and Carbon Stock in Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch) Plantation

Shabir Rather; K.N. Qaisar; Sabeena Nabi; et al. Current World Environment 2017. doi:10.12944/cwe.12.2.17

Other claims from this paper (7)

Association Tree growth measures increased with diameter class.
Association Component biomass increased significantly with diameter.
Association Total biomass was highest under D4 at 475.54 kg/tree fresh.
Association Carbon stock increased to 148.59 kg/tree under D4.
Association Carbon dioxide equivalent increased to 543.82 kg/tree under D4.
Association Branch and root allocation coefficients were higher in smaller diameter classes.
Association Growth efficiency of components did not differ significantly by diameter.

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy thinning appeared to increase foliage fraction, without statistical significance.

Taxon: Shortleaf PinePinus echinatat0
Treatment: heavily thinnede0
Outcome: proportion of foliage to total biomasse0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Shortleaf Pine”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–97

e0
“heavily thinned stands increase in terms of proportion of foliage to total biomass; however it was not statistically significant.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1191

Title

Aboveground Biomass Partitioning Due To Thinning in Naturally Regenerated Evenaged Shortleaf Pine (Pinus Echinata Mill.) Stands in Southeast Oklahoma

Gyawali, Nabin SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma) 2014

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Total tree and bole wood biomass in thinned plots converged toward unthinned plots.
Intervention effect At site one, 70% stocking exceeded unthinned biomass after 16 years.
Association Heavily thinned stands may take longer to converge in biomass.
Association Foliage and bark biomass fell as thinning intensity rose.
Intervention effect Thinning significantly affected the biomass proportions in branches and bark.
Intervention effect Except for heavy thinning, thinning did not significantly affect bole allocation proportion.
Intervention effect Thinning appeared to reduce total foliage biomass.
Association Better sites allocated more biomass to bole wood.
Association Better sites allocated less biomass to foliage.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No intra-annual trade-off between reproduction and foliage biomass was found in either sex of either Rhamnus species at any modular level.

Taxon: RhamnusRhamnust0
Organ / stage: shoot/sub-branch level, branch level and shrub levele1
Outcome: intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and foliage biomasse1
Setting: temperate forests of northeast Chinat0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0
“two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–96

e1
“There were no intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and foliage biomass in either sex of either species at shoot/sub-branch level, branch level and shrub level”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–793

Title

Reproductive allocation of two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China

J Wang; C Zhang; X Zhao; et al. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 2013. doi:10.3832/ifor1020-007

Other claims from this paper (7)

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage weight correlations with tree characteristics were rarely significant within groups.

Taxon: temperate tree speciest0
Organ / stage: foliagee0
Outcome: Linear correlations between foliage weight and other tree characteristicse0
Qualifier: rarely significant within the two tree groupse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Linear correlations between foliage weight and other tree characteristics were rarely significant within the two tree groups”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–398

t0
“temperate tree species”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 19–41

Title

Foliage Biomass in Temperate Tree Species

Stuart A. Nicholson The American Midland Naturalist 1975. doi:10.2307/2424104

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage and roots were not significantly affected by the former red alder site.

Taxon: Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Treatment: former red alder sitee1
Outcome: Foliage and rootse4
Direction: not significantly affectede4
Comparator: former Douglas-fire2

Verbatim

e0
“on the biomass and nutrition of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–157

e1
“The seedlings grown on the former red alder site showed a 65% biomass increase in current twigs, 41% increase in older twigs, and 45% increase in stems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–420

e2
“comparing two adjacent plots of seedlings planted on former Douglas-fir and red alder sites”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–267

e4
“Foliage and roots were not significantly affected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–471

Title

Effect of soil changes caused by red alder (Alnusrubra) on biomass and nutrient status of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii) seedlings

Stanislaw Brozek Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1990. doi:10.1139/x90-175

Other claims from this paper (11)

“biomass in foliage”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics