Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave maximum straw yield of 7072.20 kg ha-1.

A claim from Assessment of Plant Growth Promoters on Growth Characteristics, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties in Central Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh, India · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient spray gave maximum straw yield of 7072.20 kg ha-1.

Treatment
blend of micronutrients (Zn, Fe, B, Cu) @ 0.5% foliar spraye0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7072.20 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–122
e0

“blend of micronutrients (Zn, Fe, B, Cu) @ 0.5% foliar spray at tillering stage resulted in the significant maximum plant height (86.55 cm), crop growth rate (0.243 g m-2 day-1), at 45 to 90 DAS, number of tillers (425.13 m-2) at maturity, grain yield (4572.17 kg ha-1) and straw yield (7072.20 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1395

Title

Assessment of Plant Growth Promoters on Growth Characteristics, Yield Attributes and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties in Central Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh, India

Prateek Saxena; V. K. Verma; M.Z. Siddiqui; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2024. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i84942

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-2fd26b20537cd22d5eab0fee91ffa0dae4b6445945c5bb84737f6cbfed695372 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Copper reduced wheat 100-grain weight.

    The ameliorative effects of exogenously applied proline on physiological and biochemical parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop under copper stress condition · 2018

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Zinc and copper gave no wheat yield response in the trials where manganese did.

    Wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) response to micronutrients (Mn, Cu, Zn, B) in Canterbury, New Zealand · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Copper at 150 or 300 mg Cu kg−1 soil significantly reduced grain yield of wheat.

    Hydrogen Peroxide Mitigates Cu Stress in Wheat · 2023

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Cu or Zn deficiency decreased biomass, leaf Cu/Zn and seed yield of wheat.

    Deficiency of manganese is alleviated more by low zinc than low copper in wheat · 2000

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Combined copper and zinc application without phosphorus significantly reduced wheat yield in a Dark Gray Chernozem.

    Zinc and copper interactions under variable soil phosphorus and moisture conditions in selected Saskatchewan soils · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Copper treatments did not significantly affect cereal or forage yield.

    Copper nutrition of cereals and forages grown in Prince Edward Island · 1989

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn) had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Maximizing wheat yield through integrated use of farmyard manure and fertilizers · 2016

    Opposite direction

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    soil application of Fe-EDDHA did not significantly affect wheat dry matter yield.

    Interaction of Iron with Copper, Zinc, and Manganese in Wheat as Affected by Iron and Manganese in a Calcareous Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Severe iron decrement did not affect crop growth or yield contributing parameters.

    Effects of Iron on the Wheat Crop (Triticum aestivum L.) by Uptake of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium · 2012

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Iron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of sulphur and micronutrients on growth, nutrient content and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). · 2000

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Salmag with Fe had a slightly weaker grain yield effect than pure Salmag.

    New Fertilisers with Innovative Chelates in Wheat Cultivation · 2024 · compared with pure Salmag®

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Fe addition had no effect on wheat grain yield.

    Loading of zinc and iron in grains of different wheat genotypes in the calcareous and floodplain soils of Bangladesh · 2023

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Micronutrients (Zn, Cu, Fe and Mn) had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Maximizing wheat yield through integrated use of farmyard manure and fertilizers · 2016

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Additional iron did not change wheat yield or iron or manganese uptake.

    Response to iron and manganese application as affected by their availability in a Typic Natraqualf · 1994

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Soil or foliar application of FeSO4 and ZnSO4, alone or combined, increased plant height, tiller number and spike length of wheat.

    Biofortification with Zinc and Iron Improves the Grain Quality and Yield of Wheat Crop · 2020

    Same direction

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil Zn application did not significantly affect wheat grain yield.

    Relevance for food sciences of quantitative spatially resolved element profile investigations in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Zn-EDTA gave the opposite grain yield result to ZnSO4.

    Zinc Enrichment in Two Contrasting Genotypes of Triticum aestivum L. Grains: Interactions between Edaphic Conditions and Foliar Fertilizers · 2021 · compared with ZnSO4

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Combined foliar zinc and pesticides had no adverse effect on grain yield or other nutrients.

    Improving Zinc Concentration and Bioavailability of Wheat Grain through Combined Foliar Applications of Zinc and Pesticides · 2019

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.