Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations at tillering and flowering significantly increased CGR, RGR and leaf area index of wheat compared with no or one irrigation.

A claim from Response of irrigation schedule, mulching and hydrogel on various growth analysis attributes and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at tillering and flowering significantly increased CGR, RGR and leaf area index of wheat compared with no or one irrigation.

Treatment
two irrigations at tillering and flowering (I2)e1
Outcome
CGR (g/m2/day), RGR (g/g/day), leaf area indexe1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
I0 (no irrigation) and I1 (one irrigation)e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of irrigation schedules and moisture conservation practices on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–207
e1

“Application of two irrigations at tillering and flowering (I2) resulted in significant increase in CGR (g/m2/day), RGR (g/g/day), leaf area index and nutrient uptake by crop than I0 (no irrigation) and I1 (one irrigation) treatments during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–859

Title

Response of irrigation schedule, mulching and hydrogel on various growth analysis attributes and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

SP Singh; RK Singh; Santosh Kumar Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-56de6b550588fcecb7eb8c786ce72032eaf8912f32e1b05f4a16f2775380708d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Successive drought stresses at both stages raised canopy temperature more than a single stress.

    Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat · 2000 · compared with plants stressed only once

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Later imazamethabenz application increased wild oat fresh weight.

    Defining Optimum Herbicide Rates and Timing for Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)1 · 2000

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Glyphosate at any studied rate at early flowering did not reduce wheat height.

    Wheat Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift · 2007

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Withholding irrigation before anthesis had detrimental effects on most growth characters of wheat.

    Agronomic Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as Influenced by Moisture Stress at Various Growth Stages and Seeding Rate · 1987

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Irrigation four weeks after flowering ended had no effect on further wheat grain growth.

    Growth Rate of Grains and Grain Yield of Wheat in Relation to Drought · 1985

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    flag leaf area declined under non irrigation at flowering by 19.3%.

    Effects of late Season Drought Stress on Grain Yield, Protein, Proline and ABA of Bread Wheat Varieties · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Successive stress at growth stages severely reduced vegetative growth.

    Growth and Yield Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to under Water Stress Conditions · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Wheat germination fell 10% with vinasse during imbibition and germination.

    Herbicidal and Seed Dormancy Induction Activity of Fermentation Residual Vinasse · 2018

    Opposite direction

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soil water level had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing irrigation water salinity lowered shoot dry matter, particularly without zinc sulfate.

    Salinity and Zinc Application Effects on Phytoavailability of Cadmium and Zinc · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Aboveground biomass was similar under subsurface drip and flood irrigation.

    Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat · 2019 · compared with flood irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil inhibited wheat growth and development.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Two irrigations inhibited root growth into deeper soil layers.

    Irrigation and Nitrogen Regimes Promote the Use of Soil Water and Nitrate Nitrogen from Deep Soil Layers by Regulating Root Growth in Wheat · 2018

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Soil water treatment had no effect on kernel growth rate.

    Water and Nitrogen Effects on Winter Wheat in the Southeastern Coastal Plain: I. Grain Yield and Kernel Traits · 1995

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Restricted water supply reduced shoot and root biomass in wheat.

    Early Season Drought Largely Reduces Grain Yield in Wheat Cultivars with Smaller Root Systems · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Crop and water treatment had no significant effect on wheat growth parameters.

    Intercropping of Faba Bean with Wheat Under Low Water Availability Promotes Faba Bean Nodulation and Root Growth in Deeper Soil Layers · 2015

    Opposite direction

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Tilled sorghum residue delayed development of the following wheat crop compared with fallow.

    Allelopathy of Sorghum on Wheat under Several Tillage Systems · 2000 · compared with fallow

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Partial defoliation inhibited early bud growth.

    Effects of Kinetin on Tiller Bud Elongation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 1973

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Plant growth was reduced in continuous winter wheat with burning and plowing compared with the no-till treatments with crop rotations.

    Soilborne Pathogens of Cereals in an Irrigated Cropping System: Effects of Tillage, Residue Management, and Crop Rotation · 2009 · compared with no-till treatments with crop rotations

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Compaction to 1.7 g cm−3 significantly reduced wheat root length, volume and surface area relative to lower compaction.

    The effects of soil compaction on wheat seedling root growth are specific to soil texture and soil moisture status · 2023 · compared with lower compaction levels

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    In two dry autumns, wheat establishment after ploughing was slower and less complete than after direct drilling.

    Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals: 3. Winter wheat and spring barley on a calcareous clay · 1979 · compared with direct drilling

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Compaction delayed wheat germination.

    Mixed Effects of Soil Compaction on the Nitrogen Cycle Under Pea and Wheat · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Reduced green manure tillage did not affect wheat establishment.

    Blade Roller–Green Manure Interactions on Nitrogen Dynamics, Weeds, and Organic Wheat · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    The same compaction after mixing to 10.5 cm significantly reduced root weight.

    The use of undisturbed soil cores to study methods of controlling rhizoctonia patch of cereals · 1984

    Opposite direction

258 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.