Paper · 1975 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of sulphur fertilizers and of copper on the yield and composition of spring wheat grown in an sandy soil prone to surface compaction

J. Bolton

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY A condition known as ‘scorch” with symptoms similar to copper deficiency often occurs in dry weather on cereals grown on a sandy soil (at Woburn) with an unstable structure. Plants with symptoms contained more sulphur than normal and sulphur/ copper interactions were suspected. Sulphur fertilizers tested in two pot experiments with this soil did not induce copper deficienciesbut increased grain and straw yields of spring wheat especially at higher nitrogen rates. Yields were increased when the mature grain contained less than 0.12% S and the straw less than 0.5% Sin the dry matter. Sulphur concentrations were larger in plants grown in the greenhouse rather than in growth cabinets and in plants grown in oven-dried rather than air-dried soil. Soil-applied copper sulphate slightly increased grain yields in pots but in one experiment there were no corresponding increases in copper contents of the crop. In a field experiment where ‘scorch’ symptoms occurred in 1972, copper oxychloride sprays increased copper concentrations but not yields of the grain. These results suggest that copper deficiency is unlikely to be a primary cause of ‘scorch’ symptoms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symptomatic cereals contained more sulphur than normal plants.

Outcome
sulphure0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
normale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Plants with symptoms contained more sulphur than normal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilizers did not induce copper deficiencies.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Sulphur fertilizerse0
Outcome
copper deficienciese0
Direction
did not inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur fertilizers tested in two pot experiments with this soil did not induce copper deficienciesbut increased grain and straw yields of spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilizer increased wheat grain and straw yields, especially at higher nitrogen rates.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Sulphur fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
higher nitrogen ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur fertilizers tested in two pot experiments with this soil did not induce copper deficienciesbut increased grain and straw yields of spring wheat especially at higher nitrogen rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–474 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases occurred below grain and straw sulphur thresholds.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
mature graine0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
less than 0.12% S and the straw less than 0.5% Sin the dry mattere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were increased when the mature grain contained less than 0.12% S and the straw less than 0.5% Sin the dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant sulphur concentrations were larger in greenhouse than growth cabinet conditions.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Sulphur concentrationse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
growth cabinetse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur concentrations were larger in plants grown in the greenhouse rather than in growth cabinets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant sulphur concentrations were larger in oven-dried than air-dried soil.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
oven-driede0
Outcome
Sulphur concentrationse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
air-dried soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur concentrations were larger in plants grown in the greenhouse rather than in growth cabinets and in plants grown in oven-dried rather than air-dried soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied copper sulphate slightly increased pot grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Soil-applied copper sulphatee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-applied copper sulphate slightly increased grain yields in pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulphate did not increase crop copper content in one pot experiment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
copper contents of the crope0
Direction
no corresponding increasese0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in one experiment there were no corresponding increases in copper contents of the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride spray increased grain copper concentration in a field experiment.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
copper oxychloride sprayse0
Outcome
copper concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper oxychloride sprays increased copper concentrations but not yields of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper oxychloride spray did not increase field grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
copper oxychloride sprayse0
Outcome
yields of the graine0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper oxychloride sprays increased copper concentrations but not yields of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper deficiency was judged unlikely to be the primary cause of scorch.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Compound
coppere0
Outcome
‘scorch’ symptomse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“copper deficiency is unlikely to be a primary cause of ‘scorch’ symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

copper atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 63 positive, 12 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.