Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Effect of Nano Urea on Growth, Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Irrigated Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Guriya Rani; Himanshu Prakash; Goldee Kumari; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In the rabi season of 2021-22, the investigation was conducted at Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, Bhagalpur (Bihar), to study the effects of nano urea on growth attributes, yield and nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Randomized block design (RBD) with thirteen treatments in three replications was used. Treatments involved different levels of nitrogen i.e- 0, 50, 75 and 100% of recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) along with 5% urea solution and nano-urea applied at tillering and jointing stages. The results showed that 100% and 75% RDN with two sprays of nano urea significantly improved the yield attributes like plant height, Leaf area Index (LAI), test weight, dry matter accumulation and yield. This study gave the highest grain yield of 4573 kg h-1 for RDN + two spray of urea (5%) and 4492 kg h-1 from RDN + two spray of nano urea. The present study has also shown that application of 75% RDN with nano urea resulted in the highest NUE of 10.20 kg kg-1. This means that nano-urea can be used with conventional urea without an adverse effect on high productivity of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full and three-quarter recommended nitrogen doses with two nano urea sprays significantly improved plant height and leaf area index.

Treatment
100% and 75% RDN with two sprays of nano ureae0
Outcome
plant height, Leaf area Index (LAI)e0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% and 75% RDN with two sprays of nano urea significantly improved the yield attributes like plant height, Leaf area Index (LAI), test weight, dry matter accumulation and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same nitrogen and nano urea treatments improved test weight, dry matter accumulation, and yield.

Treatment
100% and 75% RDN with two sprays of nano ureae0
Outcome
test weight, dry matter accumulation and yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% and 75% RDN with two sprays of nano urea significantly improved the yield attributes like plant height, Leaf area Index (LAI), test weight, dry matter accumulation and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen plus two 5% urea sprays yielded 4573 kg h-1 grain.

Treatment
RDN + two spray of urea (5%)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4573 kg h-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield of 4573 kg h-1 for RDN + two spray of urea (5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended nitrogen plus two nano urea sprays yielded 4492 kg h-1 grain.

Treatment
RDN + two spray of nano ureae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
4492 kg h-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield of 4573 kg h-1 for RDN + two spray of urea (5%) and 4492 kg h-1 from RDN + two spray of nano urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-quarter recommended nitrogen with nano urea gave the highest nitrogen use efficiency of 10.20 kg kg-1.

Treatment
75% RDN with nano ureae0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
10.20 kg kg-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDN with nano urea resulted in the highest NUE of 10.20 kg kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nano urea can accompany conventional urea without harming high wheat productivity.

Outcome
nano-urea can be used with conventional urea without an adverse effect on high productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nano-urea can be used with conventional urea without an adverse effect on high productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1119 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.