View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 177 Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shirazi had a greater decrease in water potential and relative water content than Gharashani.
water potential and relative water content e0 higher decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “It also had a higher decrease in water potential and relative water content and a lower in crease in leaf area as compared with Gharashani. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–530 t0 “GRAPE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 e1 “Shirazi showed a higher decrease in shoot and root lengths and fresh weights than Gharashani ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–390 e2 “2-week salinity (25, 50 and 100 mM NaCl) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d banana leaf relative water content .
decreased in water content e0 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants with decrease d in water content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1833 t0 “banana cultivars and hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–70 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
leaf area and relative water content e2 a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
mineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
leaf rust e0 pathogen relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
drought-treated e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
drought condition e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
osmotic stress t0 seedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d leaf relative water content .
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–701 t0 “Glycine max cv. Sambaiba
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 t1 “control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–570 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
drought treatments e0 relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Above a relative - water - content threshold, a slight decline in water content sharply reduced stomatal conductance.
above which a slight decrease in RWC e0 Not reported Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “a threshold of relative water content (RWC) was found, above which a slight decrease in RWC lead to a sharp reduction in g s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–547 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, the decrease in leaf relative water content , net photosynthesis and biomass was smaller in Otis than in Baronesse.
leaf relative water content, net photosynthesis, and biomass accumulation e1 Verbatim
e2 “drought-tolerant (Otis) and drought-sensitive (Baronesse) barley genotypes subjected to drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–480 e1 “The drought- in duced decrease in the leaf relative water content , net photosynthesis, and biomass accumulation was relative ly low in Otis compared to Baronesse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–712 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat exposure reduced chlorophyll and carotenoid content s and relative water content .
chlorophyll contents, carotenoids, relative water contents e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “heat exposure made a prominent decrease in chlorophyll content s, carotenoids, relative water content s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–809 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d barley seedling relative water content by 55%.
applied drought stress e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The applied drought stress caused a 55% decrease in the relative water content (RWC) in seedlings, while re- water ing in creased the RWC to 90% of the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–610 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMTU partly alleviated the PEG- in duced decrease in relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “partially alleviated the root cell death and the decrease of the relative water content in duced by PEG 6000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–544 t0 “rice roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer water stress produced a proportional decrease in relative water content and leaf water potential in rice.
relative water content and leaf water potential e2 proportional decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “of Oryza sativa L. were subjected to water stress for 5, 8 or 10 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–219 e2 “produced a proportional decrease in relative water content and leaf water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–352 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
PEG treatment reduced relative water content in rice leaves.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PEG treatment resulted in a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–178 t0 “Rice Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll and relative water content of tomato tended to decrease as stress level in creased.
increase in stress level e5 chlorophyll and the relative water content e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “tomato genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 e5 “physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease , while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to in crease following an in crease in stress level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1211 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 25% in experiment 1.
water-deficit stress t0 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 29% in experiment 2.
water-deficit stress t0 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype ICC15868.
relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype GL26054.
relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype L552.
relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content , stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment.
water deficits e0 relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 e0 “water deficits led to a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–607 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
S1 irrigation level e0 relative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower plant height, leaf area in dex, and relative water content .
salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses e0 plant height, leaf area index, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plant height, leaf area in dex, relative water content , number of heads per plant, number of seeds per head, 1000-seeds weight, seed yield, oil content , net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decrease under salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–801 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower head number, seed number per head, and thousand-seed weight. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower seed yield and oil content. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. Intervention effect The 10 dS m -1 salinity and 40% irrigation treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 92.6% at heading. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 71.04% at stem elongation. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 89.9% at flowering. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
ABI1 overexpression reduced relative water content under drought compared with wild type.
overexpressing A. thaliana ABI1 e1 relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “Brassica napus L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–92 e0 “Transgenic plants subjected to drought showed a decrease in relative water content , photosynthetic pigments content and expression level of RAB18- and RD19A-drought-responsive marker genes relative to WT plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–760 e1 “overexpressing A. thaliana ABI1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–547 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
NaCl priming lessened the salinity-related loss of relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “NaCl priming reduced the decrease in relative water content under salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1006 t0 “Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought from flowering and pod formation decrease d leaf relative water content and stomatal conductance.
drought from flowering and pod formation stages e0 leaf relative water content, stomatal conductance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Occurring drought from flowering and pod formation stages led to significant in crease in leaf temperature and significant decrease in leaf relative water content , stomatal conductance, pods per plant, 1000 seeds weight, seed and oil yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–859 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–73 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Glycine max.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Oryza sativa
Solanum lycopersicum
Cicer arietinum
Carthamus tinctorius_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus