View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 51 Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
Average seedling dry weight e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant dry weight in crease correlated positively with nitrate content decrease in the medium.
increase of plant in dry weight e0 decrease of NO 3 - content in medium e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “There is positive correlation between in crease of plant in dry weight and decrease of NO 3 - content in medium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–431 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher in oculum reduced fresh and dry plant weight .
increase in inoculum level e0 e1 fresh and dry plant weight e0 e1 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “With the in crease in in oculum level there was corresponding decrease in fresh and dry plant weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–472 e1 “With the in crease in in oculum level there was corresponding decrease in fresh and dry plant weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–472 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize fresh or dry weight .
>95% relative humidity e1 growth (fresh weight and dry weight) e0 neither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing NaCl significantly decrease d shoot length and dry weight .
Increasing NaCl concentrations e0 length and dry weight of the shoots e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In creasing NaCl concentrations in duced a reduction in the leaf water potential and a significant decrease in the length and dry weight of the shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–539 e1 “maize (Zea mays L., cv. Summer II) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–255 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
>95% relative humidity e1 neither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aboveground dry weight fell 4.4% for each 10 cm decrease below 100 cm.
Above-ground dry weight e0 for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm e0 Verbatim
e0 “Above-ground dry weight was reduced by 4.4% of the mean weight for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1253 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of Ca substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
substantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of P substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
substantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 32°C P. vulgaris leaf area, dry weight , root weight and assimilation rate decrease d.
total leaf area, total dry weight, root weight, and net assimilation rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in cluded total leaf area, total dry weight , root weight , and net assimilation rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–867 e1 “Phaseolus vulgaris growth was significantly decrease d at 32°C compared with growth at 25°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–770 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Larval root and nodule access decrease d nodule number, dry weight and activity.
C. ancuata larvae were given access to roots and nodulese0 numbers, dry weights and activity of the nodules e0 Not reported Interactor Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Phaseolus vulgaris
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–120 e0 “When C. ancuata larvae were given access to roots and nodules, 2 pairs of adults were sufficient to decrease the numbers, dry weight s and activity of the nodules formed, causing a reduction in yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–613 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthetic efficiency in Phaseolus vulgaris appeared to decrease .
photosynthetic efficiency e0 Verbatim
e0 “photosynthetic efficiency in Phaseolus vulgaris also appears to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–500 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight decrease d after in oculation in susceptible Roma VF.
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in dry weight occurred after in oculation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–407 t0 “TOMATO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease d the shoot to root dry - weight ratio of cv. PE-62.
shoot to root dry-weight ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Plants of cv. PE-62 showed a decrease in shoot to root dry - weight ratio in response to salinity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–638 t0 “tomato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–79 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Alachlor reduced tomato root and shoot length and dry weight .
root and shoot length and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The presence in the nutrient medium of the herbicides alachlor or imazethapyr at concentrations of 1 and 0.01 mg L −1 , respectively, caused a marked decrease of tomato root and shoot length and dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–872 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In rice seedlings, The in crease of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings.
decrease of dry weight of grain e0 Verbatim
e0 “The in crease of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–546 t0 “rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–48 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In rice seedlings, The in crease of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings.
increase of dry weight of shoot e0 Verbatim
e0 “The in crease of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–546 t0 “rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–48 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Antioxidant enzyme activities were significantly negatively correlated with relative decrease in shoot dry weight in rice.
ascorbate peroxidase (AP), dehydroascorbate reductase (DR) and glutathione reductase(GR) e1 relative decrease in shoot dry weight (RDS) e3 negatively correlated e3 Verbatim
t0 “Tolerance to Iron Toxicity in Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–84 e1 “The results in dicate that iron stress significantly in creases the activities of ascorbate peroxidase (AP), dehydroascorbate reductase (DR) and glutathione reductase(GR) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–603 e3 “significantly negatively correlated with relative decrease in shoot dry weight (RDS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–784 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Total tuber dry weight decrease d.
total tuber dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The changes in carbohydrate accumulation are accompanied by a decrease in total tuber dry weight and a reduction of soluble tuber proteins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1297 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
PsJN reduced Chaleur root dry weight by 50%.
strain PsJN e1 other Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In oculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight , a five- to eight-fold in crease, two- to three-fold in crease, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 e1 “growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shepody root dry weight did not respond to PsJN in oculation.
strain PsJN e1 other Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In oculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight , a five- to eight-fold in crease, two- to three-fold in crease, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 e1 “growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm did not decrease weed dry weight .
Increasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm e7 did not decrease e7 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of a short-term spring-seeded smother plant on corn development and weed control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137 e7 “In creasing yellow mustard height from 10 to 20 cm delayed corn silk emergence and reduced grain yield but did not decrease weed dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1076 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with less nitrogen uptake, listed as 14.6 in a series ending in kg/ha.
total uptake of N e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–918 e1 “additional weed dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–753 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with less phosphorus uptake, listed as 2.7 in a series ending in kg/ha.
total uptake of N, P e0 Verbatim
e0 “decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–918 e1 “additional weed dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–753 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean showed a similar dry - weight decline at high soil zinc.
Verbatim
e0 “Toxicity was expressed by a decrease in dry weight with in creasing soil Zn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1226 e1 “A similar effect was shown for soybean. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1432 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower dry matter partitioning to leaves explains the greater total dry weight reduction in soybean than in pigeon pea.
total dry weight e0 the decrease in dry matter partitioning to leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in dry matter partitioning to leaves led to a greater reduction in total dry weight in soybean compared to pigeon pea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1290 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Tachinagaha had a smaller decrease in grain weight than Enrei.
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–80 e0 “乾物生産と子実重の減少程度が小さい ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–255 e1 “タチナガハはエンレイに比べて低土壌水分条件 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–164 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced the ratio of leaf dry weight to area.
ratio of leaf dry weight to area e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This accounted for a marked decrease in the ratio of leaf dry weight to area in droughted plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1181 t0 “Grapevine Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–53 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading was associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight , leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content of grapevine.
specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content e6 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthetic activity of grapevine leaves (Sangiovese/Kober 5BB) was evaluated under field conditions on mature vines grown under three different levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 100%, 60%, and 30% sunlight) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–232 e6 “All of these modifications that occurred under shading are associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight , leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content, vine yield, total soluble solids in the berries, total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane, and winter pruning weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1776 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower Pnsat, Rd and PARc than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower PARsat than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect The apparent quantum yield (φi) of shade-grown grapevines was significantly higher than in unshaded vines. Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 62% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 54% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 81% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 65% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Association The diurnal patterns of Pn, gs and ψ in grapevine leaves were positively correlated with PAR at both phenological stages. Intervention effect Shading significantly reduced leaf transpiration rate in the early morning during flowering. Intervention effect Shading left the calculated intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of grapevine leaves unaffected. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in vine yield and total soluble solids in the berries. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane and winter pruning weight. Mechanism The increase of φi, leaf chlorophyll content and the change to a more open canopy increased PAR trapping efficiency, indicating adaptability of the grapevine to low light. Association Vine yield and berry quality decreased linearly with increasing shade intensity in grapevine. Recommendation Grapevine management should ensure that most leaves receive approximately 700 to 900 µmol m-2 S-1 of PAR for most of the day during the crop cycle. Recommendation Factors that modify light availability at the canopy level must be evaluated to reduce risks of low photosynthesis, low yield and poorer grape quality. Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading was associated with a decrease in total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane and winter pruning weight .
total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane, and winter pruning weight e6 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthetic activity of grapevine leaves (Sangiovese/Kober 5BB) was evaluated under field conditions on mature vines grown under three different levels of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 100%, 60%, and 30% sunlight) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–232 e6 “All of these modifications that occurred under shading are associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight , leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content, vine yield, total soluble solids in the berries, total leaf area per vine, number of axillary shoots per cane, and winter pruning weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1776 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower Pnsat, Rd and PARc than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect Shade-grown grapevines at 60% and 30% sunlight had significantly lower PARsat than unshaded vines at flowering and veraison. Intervention effect The apparent quantum yield (φi) of shade-grown grapevines was significantly higher than in unshaded vines. Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 62% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At flowering, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 54% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 60% sunlight was about 81% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Intervention effect At veraison, Pnsat of grapevines grown at 30% sunlight was about 65% of that of unshaded vines (0900-1100 h). Association The diurnal patterns of Pn, gs and ψ in grapevine leaves were positively correlated with PAR at both phenological stages. Intervention effect Shading significantly reduced leaf transpiration rate in the early morning during flowering. Intervention effect Shading left the calculated intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of grapevine leaves unaffected. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in specific leaf dry weight, leaf soluble carbohydrates and starch content of grapevine. Association Shading was associated with a decrease in vine yield and total soluble solids in the berries. Mechanism The increase of φi, leaf chlorophyll content and the change to a more open canopy increased PAR trapping efficiency, indicating adaptability of the grapevine to low light. Association Vine yield and berry quality decreased linearly with increasing shade intensity in grapevine. Recommendation Grapevine management should ensure that most leaves receive approximately 700 to 900 µmol m-2 S-1 of PAR for most of the day during the crop cycle. Recommendation Factors that modify light availability at the canopy level must be evaluated to reduce risks of low photosynthesis, low yield and poorer grape quality. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Triticum aestivum
Phaseolus vulgaris
Solanum lycopersicum
Oryza sativa
Solanum tuberosum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Glycine max
Vitis