View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High density offered little advantage over medium density.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatormedium density e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–474 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Self-grafting provided little advantage for Cherokee Purple and Crista.
Material‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’ e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage for self-grafting of ‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1432 t0 “Tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Allowing unchopped silage to reach 100°F offered little or no advantage .
Treatmentallowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F e0 Outcomelittle or no advantage e0 Directionlittle or no advantage e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There appeared to be little or no advantage in allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–620 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Compounds with little or no selective advantage are discarded.
Verbatim
e0 “Compounds providing little or no selective advantage are discarded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–516 t0 “Asteridae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixing soil with sediments offered little yield advantage .
Verbatim
e0 “There appeared to be little yield advantage in mixing soil with sediments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1054 t0 “on sudangrass yields. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–164 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage .
Organ / stageupper leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516 t0 “corn leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors judge nutrient conditioning of little advantage to transplant growers.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “PNC offers the transplant grower little advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–835 t0 “Watermelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116 Other claims from this paper (13) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Little advantage is expected from subsoil testing for annual crops.
Qualifierlittle advantage would be expected e2 Verbatim
e2 “little advantage would be expected from subsoil testing for annual crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–335 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.
Outcomelittle yield advantage e0 Qualifierwhen harvested as hay e0 Comparatoralfalfa monocultures e0 Verbatim
e0 “alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Exponential functions offered little advantage over polynomials in model tests.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “exponential functions have little advantage over polynomials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–275 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days after ease of calculation was considered.
Treatmentdegree-day accumulations e0 Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatorcalendar days e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 e0 “The use of degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days when the ease of calculation for calendar days was considered. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Accumulating six years of crops gave little advantage over four years in reducing the coefficient of variation.
Outcomecoefficient of variation e7 Directionlittle advantage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Apple Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 e0 “six years gave little advantage over four ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–359 e7 “obtain a low coefficient of variation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–279 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect simulated Claim · model-written summary
Deep roots provided little or no advantage at the short growing-season site.
Directionno to little advantage e0 Settingshort growing season site e0 Verbatim
e0 “provided no to little advantage at the short growing season site ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–657 e1 “three pasture species differing in root depth and root distribution ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–287 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A conserved lucerne price giving a comparable gross margin to arable crops would leave dairy farmers little feeding advantage .
Outcomeeconomic advantage e0 Qualifierthe price for conserved lucerne would have to be set at a level e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the price for conserved lucerne would have to be set at a level at which dairy farmers would derive little economic advantage from feeding it ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1121 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Small flower size offers little or no advantage in terms of autofertility in Crepis tectorum .
Treatmentsmall flower size e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Verbatim
t0 “Floral reduction inCrepis tectorum(Asteraceae): tradeoffs and dominance relationships ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 e1 “small flower size offers little or no advantage in terms of autofertility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–599 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The diffuse centromere gives little advantage in survival from radiation damage in Cyperus eragrostis .
Outcomesurvival from radiation damage e4 Qualifierpossession of the diffuse centromere e4 Verbatim
e0 “A cytological investigation of meiosis in seed irradiated Cyperus eragrostis has shown ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–86 e4 “There is little advantage in terms of survival from radiation damage, resulting from the possession of the diffuse centromere ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–772 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Reciprocation between uptake and utilization efficiency contributed little to advantage .
Outcomeintercropping advantage e0 e1 Qualifierreciprocation of iron uptake and utilization efficiency of crops e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The reciprocation of iron uptake and utilization efficiency of crops also had little contribution to intercropping advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1059 e1 “In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–455 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism hypothesis original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
This allocation strategy gives P. nidularia an advantage on steep slopes.
Outcomean advantage on steep slopes e7 Verbatim
t0 “Phyllostachys nidularia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–104 e7 “We suggest that this strategy puts this pioneer at an advantage on steep slopes, where it contributes little to slope stability and colonizes frequently formed gaps through vegetative regeneration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1175 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.