View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat leaf water content decrease d in winter relative to summer.
leaf water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d wheat relative water content by 35.57%.
stressed conditions e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water logging caused wheat relative water content of flag leaf to decrease .
relative water content of flag leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed water logging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf in crease, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease , the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–516 t0 “Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Water logging Tolerance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–149 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
osmotic stress t0 seedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
Exogenous Spd treatment e0 leaf relative water content e0 inhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4)
not stated 34 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
H6 and Gharashani e0 relative water content e0 lower decrease e0 sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis decrease d under moisture stress along with stomatal conductance and relative water content .
photosynthesis (PN) e0 Not reported Taxon Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in photosynthesis (PN) under stress was associated with a decrease in stomatal conductance (gs) and relative water content (RWC). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–412 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought stress decrease d relative water content by 48%.
relative water content e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “DS in itially caused a 48% decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–826 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Above a relative - water - content threshold, a slight decline in water content sharply reduced stomatal conductance.
above which a slight decrease in RWC e0 Not reported Organ / stage
Verbatim
e0 “a threshold of relative water content (RWC) was found, above which a slight decrease in RWC lead to a sharp reduction in g s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–547 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Whole plant chilling decrease d relative water content and in creased proline over time.
whole‐chilled plants e0 shoot‐chilled plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Chill‐ in duced drought stress ( decrease in RWC and in crease in proline content ) developed with time in whole‐chilled plants, but not in shoot‐chilled plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–949 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decrease d by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties.
relative water content e3 in the least degree e2 Verbatim
t0 “in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163 e0 “0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285 e1 “The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decrease d by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477 e2 “Vita variety, this in dicator decrease d in the least degree – by 5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305 e3 “The relative water content (RWC) decrease d in all varieties under the action of salinity ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1119–1206 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 10%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
leaf rust e0 pathogen relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran under I1 had the smallest relative water content decline relative to I4.
drought stress treatment (I1) e0 relative water content e0 lowest decrease e0 control treatment (I4) e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The Chamran cultivar (C1) on drought stress treatment (I1) had the lowest decrease in relative water content and total chlorophyll content than with control treatment (I4). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater drought in tensity decrease d relative water content .
Intensity of drought stress e0 relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The results showed that with an in crease in the In tensity of drought stress on wheat cultivars, there was a decrease in relative water content , total chlorophyll content and in creased proline content , but was not observed on trend relating to soluble carbohydrates content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1179 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMTU partly alleviated the PEG- in duced decrease in relative water content .
relative water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “partially alleviated the root cell death and the decrease of the relative water content in duced by PEG 6000 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–544 t0 “rice roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–96 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
PEG treatment reduced relative water content in rice leaves.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “PEG treatment resulted in a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–178 t0 “Rice Leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–72 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible rice genotypes showed a larger decrease in relative water content than tolerant genotypes after 3 h low temperature.
relative water content (RWC) e1 to a higher extent e1 tolerant genotypes e1 Verbatim
t0 “tolerant and susceptible rice genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–82 e1 “susceptible rice genotypes show an in crease in lipid peroxide levels and decrease in relative water content (RWC) to a higher extent in comparison to tolerant genotypes in response to 3 h LT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–406 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
S1 decrease d leaf relative water content by 17%.
S1 irrigation level e0 relative water content (RWC) of the leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–61 e0 “The S1 irrigation level led to a decrease in Fv/Fm (5 %), relative water content (RWC) of the leaf (17 %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–615 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower plant height, leaf area in dex, and relative water content .
salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses e0 plant height, leaf area index, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plant height, leaf area in dex, relative water content , number of heads per plant, number of seeds per head, 1000-seeds weight, seed yield, oil content , net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate decrease under salinity, drought, and simultaneous stresses. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–801 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower head number, seed number per head, and thousand-seed weight. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower seed yield and oil content. Intervention effect Salinity, drought, and combined stress reduced safflower photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. Intervention effect The 10 dS m -1 salinity and 40% irrigation treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 92.6% at heading. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 71.04% at stem elongation. Intervention effect The same stress treatment reduced safflower seed yield by 89.9% at flowering. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot spraying in creased relative leaf water content .
spraying of the shoots e0 relative water content in the plant leaves e0 untreated plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “The spraying of the shoots, has led to in crease the relative water content in the plant leaves and decrease the cell membrane stability in comparison with untreated plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–672 t0 “safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease cottonseed seed vitality.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d cottonseed relative oil content .
relative oil content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD significantly in creased the relative protein content of cottonseed but decrease d the relative oil content , leading to a decrease in seed vitality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1908 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–135 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decrease d by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
susceptible cotton genotypes e1 leaf relative water content e1 tolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decreased by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll and relative water content of tomato tended to decrease as stress level in creased.
increase in stress level e5 chlorophyll and the relative water content e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “tomato genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–123 e5 “physiological parameters, namely chlorophyll and the relative water content tended to decrease , while the rate of water loss and proline content tended to in crease following an in crease in stress level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1211 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 25% in experiment 1.
water-deficit stress t0 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 29% in experiment 2.
water-deficit stress t0 leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, the decrease in leaf relative water content , net photosynthesis and biomass was smaller in Otis than in Baronesse.
leaf relative water content, net photosynthesis, and biomass accumulation e1 Verbatim
e2 “drought-tolerant (Otis) and drought-sensitive (Baronesse) barley genotypes subjected to drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–480 e1 “The drought- in duced decrease in the leaf relative water content , net photosynthesis, and biomass accumulation was relative ly low in Otis compared to Baronesse ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–712 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat exposure reduced chlorophyll and carotenoid content s and relative water content .
chlorophyll contents, carotenoids, relative water contents e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “heat exposure made a prominent decrease in chlorophyll content s, carotenoids, relative water content s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–809 t0 “Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d barley seedling relative water content by 55%.
applied drought stress e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The applied drought stress caused a 55% decrease in the relative water content (RWC) in seedlings, while re- water ing in creased the RWC to 90% of the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–610 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Glycine max
Oryza sativa
Carthamus tinctorius
Gossypium hirsutum
Solanum lycopersicum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare