Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Comparator
sexese0

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1813
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59

Title

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Comparator
the sexese0

Verbatim

e0

“there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59

Title

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian Acta Ecologica Sinica 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinitroaniline herbicides did not affect peanut foliage biomass at mid or late season.

Organ / stage
foliagee0
Treatment
Dinitroaniline herbicidese0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Direction
nor affectede0
Qualifier
mid- and late-seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dinitroaniline herbicides neither visually injured peanut nor affected foliage biomass collected at mid- and late-season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–836
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90

Title

Phytotoxicity of Delayed Applications of Dinitroaniline Herbicides in Strip-Tillage Peanut Production

W. Carroll Johnson; E. P. Prostko; Jerry Davis Peanut Science 2011. doi:10.3146/ps10-20.1

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage biomass did not decrease under heavy metal exposure.

Taxon
Sycamore MapleAcer pseudoplatanust0
Treatment
experimental exposure to copper/zinc/cadmium lead = 640/3000/10/90 mg/kgt1
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Direction
no reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no reduction of foliage biomass was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–550
t0

“Sycamore Maple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–63
t1

“experimental exposure to copper/zinc/cadmium lead = 640/3000/10/90 mg/kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–310

Title

Foliage response to heavy metal contamination in Sycamore Maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.)

André, Olivier (author); Vollenweider, Pierre (author); Günthardt-Goerg, Madeleine S. (author) DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) 2006

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen addition did not influence total biomass, foliage, fibrous root or storage root weights.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
fertilizer N additione0
Outcome
Total biomass, foliage, fibrous root and storage root weightse0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total biomass, foliage, fibrous root and storage root weights and N concentration in leaves were not influenced by fertilizer N addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–837
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12

Title

Sweet Potato Root and Biomass Production with and without Nitrogen Fertilization

Walter A. Hill; Dodo Hortense; S. K. Hahn; et al. Agronomy Journal 1990. doi:10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200060019x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature had no significant effect on peanut foliage biomass yield.

Treatment
Temperaturee3
Outcome
foliage biomass yielde3
Direction
no significant effecte3
Comparator
constant 28e1

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is under investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56
e1

“Treatments were light/ dark periods of 12/12 h or 24/0 h in combination with a constant 28 or 28/22°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–667
e3

“Temperature had no significant effect on foliage biomass yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1020

Title

Continuous Daily Light Period and Temperature Influence Peanut Yield in Nutrient Film Technique

T. Rowell; D. G. Mortley; P. A. Loretan; et al. Crop Science 1999. doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x003900040026x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage allocation coefficient did not vary significantly with tree size.

Taxon
Elmt0
Material
size of treese0
Outcome
biomass allocation coefficient of foliagee0
Direction
did not produce significant effecte0

Verbatim

e0

“The size of trees did not produce significant effect on the biomass allocation coefficient of foliage (BACf).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1307
t0

“Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–69

Title

Biomass Allocation and Carbon Stock in Elm (Ulmus Wallichiana Planch) Plantation

Shabir Rather; K.N. Qaisar; Sabeena Nabi; et al. Current World Environment 2017. doi:10.12944/cwe.12.2.17

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No intra-annual trade-off between reproduction and foliage biomass was found in either sex of either Rhamnus species at any modular level.

Taxon
RhamnusRhamnust0
Organ / stage
shoot/sub-branch level, branch level and shrub levele1
Outcome
intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and foliage biomasse1
Setting
temperate forests of northeast Chinat0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–96
e1

“There were no intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and foliage biomass in either sex of either species at shoot/sub-branch level, branch level and shrub level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–793

Title

Reproductive allocation of two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China

J Wang; C Zhang; X Zhao; et al. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 2013. doi:10.3832/ifor1020-007

Other claims from this paper (7)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliage biomass of herbaceous plants near a grass plant did not influence the number of tillers grazed or the probability of the plant being grazed.

Taxon
Grassest0
Treatment
foliage biomass of herbaceous plantse5
Interactor
SheepOvis ariest0herbivore
Outcome
number of tillers grazede5
Direction
did not influencee5
Qualifier
nor the probability of the plant being grazede5

Verbatim

t0

“Grazing of Grasses by Sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–63
e5

“The foliage biomass of herbaceous plants in the immediate vicinity of a grass plant did not influence the number of tillers grazed nor the probability of the plant being grazed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1302

Title

Spatial and Temporal Pattern in the Grazing of Grasses by Sheep Within a Semi-Arid Wooded Landscape.

KC Hodgkinson; JW Terpstra; WJ Muller The Rangeland Journal 1995. doi:10.1071/rj9950154

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Birch foliage properties were similar to aspen.

Taxon
bircht0
Outcome
foliage propertiese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
aspene0

Verbatim

e0

“its foliage properties were similar to those of aspen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1189
t0

“silver birch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–474

Title

Woody and Foliage Biomass, Foliage Traits and Growth Efficiency in Young Trees of Four Broadleaved Tree Species in a Temperate Forest

Bohdan Konôpka; Jozef Pajtík; Vladimír Šebeň; et al. Plants 2021. doi:10.3390/plants10102155

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.