Abstract
Effects of humic preparation (HP) Stimulife and PGPR (plant growth promotion rhizobacteria) Bacillus subtilis №2 on the productivity and quality of the sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions. It was experimentally established that the use of Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 resulted in an increase in plant height, productivity and biochemical composition of sweet peppers. Differences in the effect of the studied preparations on the morphometric, phenological and biochemical characteristics of plants and fruits of pepper varieties Ermak and Cinderella were revealed. The bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 significantly increased the yield, the number of fruits per one plant and the contents of ascorbic acid and carbohydrates in pepper fruits. In this case, the average weight of one fruit of pepper v. Ermak decreased. HP Stimulife increased the pepper yield due to increasing the mean mass of one fruit in both pepper varieties. Joint used of HP Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 led to an intensification of the production process of plants compared to the experiment variants, in which HP Stimulife was used alone. The yield of sweet pepper Ermak and Cinderella increased by 10-45%, the maturation period of fruits was reduced by 10-14 days, the content of ascorbic acid increased by 25%, sugar content increased to 26%. The expediency of the joint application of HP Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 in the cultivation of sweet pepper under controlled conditions is substantiated.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus subtilis No. 2 significantly increased the yield and the number of fruits per plant of sweet pepper.
- Taxon
- sweet pepper
Capsicum annuume0 - Treatment
- bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2e1
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilis №2
Bacillus subtilise1symbiont - Outcome
- yield, the number of fruits per one plante1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e1“The bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 significantly increased the yield, the number of fruits per one plant and the contents of ascorbic acid and carbohydrates in pepper fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus subtilis No. 2 significantly increased the contents of ascorbic acid and carbohydrates in pepper fruits.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2e1
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilis №2Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
- Outcome
- the contents of ascorbic acid and carbohydratese1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e1“The bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 significantly increased the yield, the number of fruits per one plant and the contents of ascorbic acid and carbohydrates in pepper fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
The average weight of one sweet pepper fruit of the Ermak variety decreased.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Material
- Ermake2
- Outcome
- the average weight of one fruite2
- Direction
- decreasede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e2“In this case, the average weight of one fruit of pepper v. Ermak decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
HP Stimulife increased sweet pepper yield in both varieties, due to increased mean fruit mass.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- HP Stimulifee3
- Outcome
- the pepper yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- due to increasing the mean mass of one fruite3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e3“HP Stimulife increased the pepper yield due to increasing the mean mass of one fruit in both pepper varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint use of HP Stimulife and Bacillus subtilis No. 2 intensified the production process of sweet pepper compared with HP Stimulife alone.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- Joint used of HP Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2e4
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilis №2Bacillus subtilise4symbiont
- Outcome
- production process of plantse4
- Direction
- intensificatione4
- Comparator
- HP Stimulife was used alonee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e4“Joint used of HP Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 led to an intensification of the production process of plants compared to the experiment variants, in which HP Stimulife was used alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Sweet pepper yield of the Ermak and Cinderella varieties increased by 10-45%.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume5
- Material
- Ermak and Cinderellae5
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 10-45%e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The yield of sweet pepper Ermak and Cinderella increased by 10-45%”
Claim · model-written summary
The maturation period of sweet pepper fruits was reduced by 10-14 days.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Outcome
- maturation period of fruitse6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Value
- 10-14 dayse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e6“the maturation period of fruits was reduced by 10-14 days”
Claim · model-written summary
The content of ascorbic acid in sweet pepper fruits increased by 25%.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Outcome
- content of ascorbic acide7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 25%e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e7“the content of ascorbic acid increased by 25%”
Claim · model-written summary
The sugar content of sweet pepper fruits increased to 26%.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Outcome
- sugar contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 26%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e1“sugar content increased to 26%”
Claim · model-written summary
Stimulife and Bacillus subtilis No. 2 increased sweet pepper plant height.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Treatment
- use of Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2e1
- Interactor
- Bacillus subtilis №2Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e1“the use of Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 resulted in an increase in plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
Effects of the studied preparations on morphometric, phenological and biochemical characteristics differed between the Ermak and Cinderella varieties.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
- Material
- Ermak and Cinderellae1
- Outcome
- morphometric, phenological and biochemical characteristicse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruits were studied in the control conditions”
e1“Differences in the effect of the studied preparations on the morphometric, phenological and biochemical characteristics of plants and fruits of pepper varieties Ermak and Cinderella were revealed”
Claim · model-written summary
The joint application of HP Stimulife and Bacillus subtilis No. 2 is recommended for sweet pepper cultivation under controlled conditions.
- Taxon
- sweet pepperCapsicum annuume1
- Outcome
- expediency of the joint applicatione1
- Setting
- under controlled conditionse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The expediency of the joint application of HP Stimulife and bacteria Bacillus subtilis №2 in the cultivation of sweet pepper under controlled conditions is substantiated”
The same questions in other papers
Bacillus subtilis · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Bacillus subtilis · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →other · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →inoculation · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.