View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 74 Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shirazi had a greater decrease in water potential and relative water content than Gharashani.
Outcomewater potential and relative water content e0 Directionhigher decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “It also had a higher decrease in water potential and relative water content and a lower in crease in leaf area as compared with Gharashani. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–530 t0 “GRAPE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 e1 “Shirazi showed a higher decrease in shoot and root lengths and fresh weights than Gharashani ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–390 e2 “2-week salinity (25, 50 and 100 mM NaCl) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d banana leaf relative water content .
Treatmentdecreased in water content e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants with decrease d in water content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1833 t0 “banana cultivars and hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–70 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
MaterialH6 and Gharashani e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlower decrease e0 Comparatorsensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
Interactorleaf rust e0 pathogen Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
TreatmentStress treatment e0 Directionmuch smaller decrease e0 Comparatorother wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous Spd in hibited the decline in leaf relative water content under osmotic stress.
TreatmentExogenous Spd treatment e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Directioninhibited the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous Spd treatment not only obviously in hibited the decrease of leaf relative water content ,but also in creased the content of soluble protein. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–814 t0 “Maize Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–85 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought sharply decrease d relative water content and pigment content in maize seedlings relative to control.
OutcomeRelative Water Content (RWC) e1 DirectionSharp decrease e1 Comparatorcontrol condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Drought in Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–116 e1 “Sharp decrease in Relative Water Content (RWC), Chl a, Chl b, carotenoid (Car) and total pigment content was observed under drought compared to control condition, while PAs application reversed their decreasing trends ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–578 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and relative water content .
Outcomephotosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–665 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d relative water content in clusterbean.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate (at flowering stage), stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, plant height, pod length, leaf area in dex, test weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest in dex and K+ and Na+ content in grain ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–876 t0 “clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity significantly decrease d chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomechlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Salinity was found to decrease significantly the photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–694 t0 “cluster bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–76 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
Treatmentdrought treatments e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decrease d by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties.
Outcomerelative water content e3 Qualifierin the least degree e2 Verbatim
t0 “in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163 e0 “0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285 e1 “The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decrease d by 17% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477 e2 “Vita variety, this in dicator decrease d in the least degree – by 5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305 e3 “The relative water content (RWC) decrease d in all varieties under the action of salinity ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1119–1206 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 10%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%. Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Treatmentunder water deficiency 60 e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Comparatorcontrol plants (100% field capacity) e2 Verbatim
t0 “soybean (Glycine max merri.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109 e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755 e1 “treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848 e2 “when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decrease d by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
Materialsusceptible cotton genotypes e1 Outcomeleaf relative water content e1 Comparatortolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decreased by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium- in duced in creases in relative water content and membrane stability were in terpreted as protective against salt stress.
Outcomeprotective mechanisms against NaCl stress e0 Qualifierrelative water content and membrane stability index e0 Verbatim
e0 “In conclusion, K- in duced decrease in Na + , in crease in Ca 2+ , K + , K + : Na + ratio, relative water content and membrane stability in dex provide protective mechanisms against NaCl stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–2051 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–96 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under salinity stress, chlorophyll content decrease d by 56% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones.
Materialsusceptible cotton genotypes e1 Outcomechlorophyll content e1 Comparatortolerant ones e1 Verbatim
e1 “Fifteen day old seedlings registered decrease in shoot length (50.6%) and root length (41.6%), shoot weight (50%) and root weight (41%), leaf relative water content (26%), chlorophyll content (56%) and Fv/Fm (12.9%) in susceptible cotton genotypes to greater degree than the tolerant ones in response to salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–493 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot length decreased by 50.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root length decreased by 41.6% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, shoot weight decreased by 50% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, root weight decreased by 41% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, leaf relative water content decreased by 26% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Under salinity stress, Fv/Fm decreased by 12.9% in susceptible cotton genotypes, to a greater degree than in tolerant ones. Intervention effect Proline, glycine and betaine increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect Total sugars increased in cotton in response to salinity. Intervention effect The increase in osmolytes was even greater with ABA priming under salinity in susceptible seedling leaves. Intervention effect ABA treatment had a positive effect on physiological and growth parameters of cotton. Intervention effect ABA seed pre-treatment ameliorated the negative impact of salinity stress in susceptible cotton seedlings. Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
PEG pretreatment gave a smaller low-temperature decrease in relative water content , water potential and osmotic potential than no pretreatment.
TreatmentPretreated with 10% PEG e1 Outcomerelative water content,water potential and osmotic potential e1 Directionlow decreased degree e1 Comparatornon-pretreated seedlings e1 Verbatim
e0 “cucumber(Cucumis sativa L) seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–170 e1 “Pretreated with 10% PEG before exposure to stress condition,cucumber seedlings showed a significant low decrease d degree in relative water content , water potential and osmotic potential,while high in creased degree in proline,soluble sugar and soluble protein content s, in comparison with non-pretreated seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–1051 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Transgenic cucumber had significantly higher leaf relative water content under chilling.
Treatmenttransgenic cucumber e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in membrane in jury in dex (MII), in crease in activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT), free proline content and relative water content (RWC) in the leaves were observed in transgenic cucumber as compared to wild-type under chilling stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1119 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Transgenic cucumber had greater leaf relative water content under chilling than wild type.
Treatmenttransgenic cucumber e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in membrane in jury in dex (MII), in crease in activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT), free proline content and relative water content (RWC) in the leaves were observed in transgenic cucumber as compared to wild-type under chilling stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1120 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salt concentration decrease leaf water potential and relative water content .
Treatmentincreasing salt concentration e0 Outcomeleaf water potential and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results of this work in dicate that in creasing salt concentration in the nutrient solution leads to: (a) a decline in the stomata conductance (b) the reduction of leaf chlorophyll content (c) to a decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content (d) the reduction of vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area (e) significantly decrease in the leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–2262 t0 “Apple (M. pomila ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salt concentration decrease leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh and dry weight.
Treatmentincreasing salt concentration e0 Outcomeleaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results of this work in dicate that in creasing salt concentration in the nutrient solution leads to: (a) a decline in the stomata conductance (b) the reduction of leaf chlorophyll content (c) to a decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content (d) the reduction of vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area (e) significantly decrease in the leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–2262 t0 “Apple (M. pomila ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salt concentration reduction leaf chlorophyll content .
Treatmentincreasing salt concentration e0 Outcomeleaf chlorophyll content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The results of this work in dicate that in creasing salt concentration in the nutrient solution leads to: (a) a decline in the stomata conductance (b) the reduction of leaf chlorophyll content (c) to a decrease in leaf water potential and relative water content (d) the reduction of vegetative shoot growth, diameter of stem and trunk width area (e) significantly decrease in the leaf area, leaf expansion rate, leaf fresh… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–2262 t0 “Apple (M. pomila ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–29 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease d leaf relative water content in green gram.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants under salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–751 t0 “Green Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 t1 “Green Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex and leaf area of green gram.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll stability index, leaf area e1 Comparatornormal condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “physiology, growth and yield of green gram under normal condition till anthesis stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–207 e1 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the respect of photosynthetic and transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex, leaf area, plant height, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod, test weight and grain yield with a significant in crease in leaf temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–668 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease d soluble protein content in green gram.
Outcomesoluble protein content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants under salinity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–751 t0 “Green Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 t1 “Green Gram ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–124 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d barley seedling relative water content by 55%.
Treatmentapplied drought stress e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The applied drought stress caused a 55% decrease in the relative water content (RWC) in seedlings, while re- water ing in creased the RWC to 90% of the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–610 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity significantly decrease d relative water content and membrane stability.
Treatmentsalt stress up to EC 12 dSm-1 e0 Outcomerelative water content, cell membrane stability e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease were recorded in Chlorophyll, protein, relative water content , cell membrane stability, with in crease in salt stress up to EC 12 dSm-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–856 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc treatment reduced water content by 14% relative to control.
Verbatim
e0 “For Zn and Cd at the concentrations used, the decrease in water content was 14% compared with the control and 26% for Cr ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–937 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.