View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
TaSAMT1 converts SA to methyl SA .
converts SA to methyl SA e0 Verbatim
t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 e0 “TaSAMT1 that converts SA to methyl SA (MeSA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–389 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
No detectable JA or SA was observed in the control, SA and JA+ SA combined treatments of potato genotypes.
detectable JA and SA e3 Control, SA and JA+SA combined treatments e3 Verbatim
e0 “four distinct potato genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–461 e3 “no detectable JA and SA was observed in Control, SA and JA+ SA combined treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1486 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect In Compost Tea, potato genotype KH had 15.42 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect In Compost Tea, potato genotype KJ had 133.67 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect In Compost Tea, potato genotype AC4 had 10.36 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect In Compost Tea, potato genotype AC6 had 7.92 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect JA treatment gave potato genotype KH 83.03 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect JA treatment gave potato genotype KJ 184.14 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect JA treatment gave potato genotype AC4 286.95 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect JA treatment gave potato genotype AC6 9.2 µg ml-1 endogenous detectable JA, while none was detected in the control. Intervention effect JA treatment enhanced endogenous detectable JA more than Compost Tea did in potato. Method / resource The JA absorption spectrum showed a peak at 295 nm. Method / resource The SA absorption spectrum showed a peak at 325 nm. Method / resource The JA retention time under the HPLC conditions was 3.74 min. Method / resource The SA retention time under the HPLC conditions was 2.86 min. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SA increased endogenous free SA .
levels of endogenous free SA e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “SA treatments markedly increase the levels of endogenous free SA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–509 t0 “Okra ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sa licylic acid was a biosynthetic precursor for SA -Mal and SA -Asp.
SA-Mal and SA-Asp e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “SA functions as a biosynthetic precursor for SA -Mal and SA -Asp ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–895 t0 “In Arabidopsis thaliana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–147 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
BnaA10.WRKY75 promoted SA biosynthesis and SA -dependent defense.
SA biosynthesis and activating SA-dependent defenses e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “thereby promoting SA biosynthesis and activating SA -dependent defenses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1030 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous SA raises endogenous SA levels.
endogenous SA levels e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Exogenous SA leads to an increase in endogenous SA levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1792 t0 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 t1 “plant production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–106 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
SA induction was abolished in the SA induction-deficient2 mutant.
SA induction-deficient2 mutant e0 completely abolished e0 Verbatim
e0 “the increase in SA was completely abolished in the SA induction-deficient2 mutant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–653 e1 “Arabidopsis plants
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–390 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Exogenous SA activated genes associated with SA signaling pathways.
SA signaling pathways e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–112 e0 “Exogenous SA activated genes associated with gibberellin, abscisic acid, brassinosteroid, and SA signaling pathways ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1240 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect RNA-seq identified 6,668 differentially expressed genes in potato under SA treatment. Intervention effect RNA-seq identified 3,815 differentially expressed genes in potato under ABT treatment. Observation 1,759 DEGs showed inverse expression patterns between the SA and ABT treatments. Observation The DEGs were predominantly involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism and plant hormone signal transduction. Observation The DEGs were also predominantly involved in MAPK signaling and plant-pathogen interactions. Intervention effect Exogenous SA activated genes associated with gibberellin, abscisic acid and brassinosteroid signaling. Intervention effect Exogenous SA suppressed key jasmonic acid signaling genes, including JAR1 and MYC2. Intervention effect Multiple PR1 genes were strongly upregulated by SA. Intervention effect Transcription factors from the WRKY, ERF, C2H2, MYB and NAC families were strongly upregulated by SA. Mechanism Virus-induced gene silencing showed that NbPAL1 and NbPAL2 are essential regulators of SA biosynthesis. Intervention effect SA treatment strongly induced 19 glutathione S-transferases among detoxification-related enzymes. Intervention effect SA treatment strongly induced 30 cytochrome P450 genes among detoxification-related enzymes. Intervention effect Two isoforms of CYP94B3, involved in JA-Ile hydroxylation, were induced by SA. Intervention effect Two isoforms of CYP94B3 were repressed by ABT. Mechanism observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SA enhanced oak resistance by priming SA -dependent gene expression.
SA-dependent gene expression e0 Verbatim
e0 “BABA and SA enhanced resistance by priming callose deposition and SA -dependent gene expression, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–531 t0 “Oak Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–64 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SA nanospheres sustained release of SA .
sustained release e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “The SA nanospheres exhibited a sustained release ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–101 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Solanum tuberosum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Arabidopsis thaliana
Quercus